Search

Problem: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affecting neonates with fetal exposure to opioids, is defined by expression and severity of symptoms. The pathophysiology behind symptoms variability is lacking. The study aims were to examine (a) differences in gut microbiota of neonates with and without NAS, (b) the relationships between gut microbiota and symptom expression and NAS severity, and (c) the changes in the neonate gut microbiota diversity during the course of NAS treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional observational design was used to examine differences in microbiota and a longitudinal, repeated measures approach was used to determine relationships between gut microbiota and NAS symptoms. Symptom data were collected using the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool and the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale. Stool samples were collected for microbiome analyses with 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Results: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS were seen. Relative abundance results revealed 18 taxa were different in neonates with NAS compared to neonates without NAS. No differences were found in alpha or beta diversity in neonates with NAS between enrollment and hospital discharge. There was increased abundance of Escherichia-Shigella and Bacteriodes genera related to higher symptom scores. Discussion: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS may be due to differences in birth mode and type of feeding. The findings of specific increased bacteria related to increased symptoms in the neonates with NAS may also be influenced by birth mode and type of feeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rising admission rates of Hispanic/Latinx families to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have increased the number of non-English-speaking individuals who may wish to participate in research studies. However, a lack of appropriately translated research study materials may limit the opportunity for these families to be involved in research that could impact the care that infants and families receive in the NICU. Purpose: The primary purpose was to pilot test study materials that were transcreated from English to Spanish with the assistance of a bilingual community advisory board with Spanish-speaking parents of NICU infants. Methods: A total of 19 Spanish-speaking parents (15 mothers and 4 fathers) who were representative of the population of interest completed paper-and-pencil surveys, along with a cognitive interview. Preliminary data related to decision-making and goals of care, infant symptoms, and their experiences in the NICU were also collected. Results: The internal reliability of the transcreated study instruments ranged from good to excellent (a= 0.82-0.99). Participants reported that study materials were not offensive and did not make them feel uncomfortable; however, they found some words/phrases to be confusing. Parents had the opportunity to provide suggested wording changes. Implications for Practice and Research: Language barriers and a lack of cultural responsiveness can affect the care that infants and their families receive. More accurate and culturally appropriate transcreation of study materials can remove barriers to research participation and facilitate better communication with non-English-speaking families, which may lead to the development of better-informed evidence-based interventions and clinical practices in the NICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neonatal care has advanced significantly in recent years, yet racial health inequities persist in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), with infants from racial and ethnic minority groups less likely to receive recommended treatment. Healthcare providers acknowledge that there are steps that can be taken to increase knowledge and awareness regarding health inequities. Purpose: To better understand current health equity-related initiatives in the neonatal community and solicit feedback from National Association of Neonatal Nurses (NANN) membership about advancing racial equity within the organization. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in January 2021. The anonymous, onetime survey was distributed to active NANN members via SurveyMonkey and included questions related to racial equity initiatives, recommendations, and demographics. Data analysis was conducted using an exploratory approach using descriptive statistics, and thematic analysis was used to summarize responses to open-ended questions. Results: There were 325 members who completed the full survey, of whom were White (83%), female (96%), staff nurses (42%), and those with more than 16 years of experience (69%), and most (69%) were familiar with NANN's racial equity position statement. Recommendations were summarized into the following themes: (1) research, (2) education, (3) workforce diversity, (4) communication, (5) scholarships, (6) resources, and (7) community outreach. Implications for Practice and Research: NANN members offered clear and actionable recommendations to advance health equity within the neonatal community and organization, which included offering more diversity, inclusion, and equity education at the annual conferences, in ANC articles, and newsletters, and the creation of scholarships or reduced membership fees to encourage diverse enrollment in the organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: About 16,000 infants die in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) each year with many experiencing invasive medical treatments and high number of symptoms.1 To inform better management, we characterized diagnoses, symptoms, and patterns of care among infants who died in the NICU. Method: Retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) review of 476 infants who died following admission to a large regional level IV NICU in the United States over a 10-year period. Demographic, symptom, diagnosis, treatment, and end-of-life characteristics were extracted. Results: About half of infants were male (55.9%, n = 266), average gestational age was 31.3 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 6.5), and average age at death was 40.1 days (SD = 84.5; median = 12; range: 0–835). Race was documented for 65% of infants, and most were White (67.0%). One-third of infants (n = 138) were seen by fetal medicine. Most infants experienced pain through both the month and week before death (79.6%), however, infants with necrotizing enterocolitis had more symptoms in the week before death. Based on EMR, infants had more symptoms, and received more medical interventions and comfort measures during the week before death compared with the month prior. Only 35% (n = 166) received a palliative care referral. Conclusions: Although the medical profiles of infants who die in the NICU are complex, the overall number of symptoms was less than in older pediatric populations. For infants at high risk of mortality rate, providers should assess for common symptoms over time. To manage symptoms as effectively as possible, both timely and continuous communication with parents and early referral to palliative care are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit experience aversive stimuli that cause pain and distress. Maintaining adequate relief from pain and distress is challenging because of infants' varying ages and stages of development and their nonverbal status. Thus, pain and distress must be interpreted by a healthcare provider or other proxy from their own observations or perceptions. There is no standard research or clinical measure for pain and distress in infants. Objective: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the use of the COMFORT Behavior (COMFORT-B) Scale as a measure of pain and distress in infants diagnosed with life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses in the neonatal intensive care unit in comparison with the nurse-documented Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; the infants' Technology Dependence Scale; and the mothers' report of total perceived symptom scores. Methods: Infants diagnosed with life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses and hospitalized in a Level IV neonatal intensive care unit in the Midwestern United States and their parents were included. Measurement of pain and distress in infants was collected weekly from enrollment through 12 weeks or until discharge, whichever occurred first. Observations for the COMFORT-B Scale were conducted before and after standard caregiving activities. Pearson r correlations were used to compare means between pain and distress, technology dependence, and mothers' total perceived symptom scores over time. Results: Data from 78 infants (46 male and 32 female infants) of ages 23-41 weeks of gestation at birth were analyzed. No correlations were found among the COMFORT-B Scale; the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; and mothers' total perceived symptom scores. Moderate correlations were found among the Technology Dependence Scale; mothers' total perceived symptom scores; and the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale. Discussion: Performing COMFORT-B observations can be challenging, and it is unclear whether the information obtained from the COMFORT-B Scale added to the assessment of the infant's pain and distress that is typically recorded in the health record or from parents. Further evaluation is needed to determine if it is more reliable to collect the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale scores rather than conduct observations using the COMFORT-B Scale in studies of infants with life-threatening and life-limiting illnesses in the neonatal intensive care unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Respiratory distress is one of the most commonly reported symptoms in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality if not assessed and managed appropriately. Yet, a validated scale for assessing respiratory distress across clinicians in infants is not available. Furthermore, a valid and reliable scale is needed as a dependent measure in studies about infant respiratory distress. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish a content validity index (CVI) of a modification of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale© (RDOS) for use with infants who are at least 37 weeks gestational age. Design: The RDOS© was revised using the respiratory characteristics of infants and offered to clinical experts for review. Setting/Subjects: A pool of nine experts in neonatal care, including two neonatologists, two nurse practitioners, one respiratory therapist, two staff nurses, and two nurse scientists, evaluated the revised scale for content validity. Results: The scale CVI was calculated by averaging the item CVIs that were ≥0.80 yielding a scale CVI = 0.96. Our content experts further recommended adding the variable capillary perfusion. Conclusions: Content validity was established. This RDOS-Infant has clinical and research utility if subsequent psychometric testing yields additional acceptable reliability and validity statistics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The original pediatric complex chronic conditions (CCC) classification system developed in 2000/2001 is the gold standard in classifying children with life-limiting illnesses. It was significantly modified in 2014; yet the two systems have not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement and validity of the original versus the modified CCC classification systems. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) data from 2012 was used with a sample of infant decedents less than 1 years. The agreement (i.e., Cohen's Kappa Statistic) and validity (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value [PPV]) statistics were calculated. Among the 10,175 infants that were classified, the modified system performed well in identifying infants who had a CCC, and it captured infants that the original classification did not. The modified system represents an improvement over the original, but additional testing is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infants who are admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may experience significant symptom burden. Parents are often distressed by these symptoms, which can affect their long-term coping and distress. There is limited research examining nurse perceptions of infant well-being (symptoms, suffering, and quality of life [QOL]) and associations with nurse distress. Objective: The objective of this descriptive study was to explore associations between nurse perceptions of infant well-being and self-reported distress. Methods: Nurses caring for infants with potentially life-threatening/life-limiting conditions were recruited from a Level IV NICU in the Midwestern United States as a part of a study on infant symptom burden. Nurses reported their perceptions of infant well-being and their own distress on a 5-point Likert scale. Surveys were administered at the bedside weekly for up to 12 weeks, depending on length of stay. Infant suffering and QOL were examined in relation to nurse distress. A cross-classified multilevel model was used to account for dependence within nurse and within patient. Results: A total of 593 surveys were collected from nurses. Using a cross-classified multilevel model with variables entered simultaneously, nurse perceptions of greater infant suffering and lower infant QOL were significantly associated with greater nurse distress. Discussion: Preliminary evidence shows that greater perceived infant suffering and lower perceived infant QOL may be associated with greater levels of self-reported distress in NICU nurses. Further work is needed to better understand factors related to symptom management in the NICU and the potential role of caregiver distress and compassion fatigue in NICU nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims To examine the impact of errors or adverse events on emotional distress and professional quality of life in healthcare providers in the neonatal intensive care unit, and the moderating role of coworker support. Background Errors or adverse events can result in negative outcomes for healthcare providers. However, the role of coworker support in improving emotional and professional outcomes has not been examined. Design A cross-sectional online survey from a quality improvement initiative to train peer supporters in a neonatal intensive care unit. Methods During 2015, 463 healthcare providers in a neonatal intensive care unit completed a survey assessing their experiences with an error or adverse event, anxiety, depression, professional quality of life and coworker support. Results Compared with those who did not experience an error or adverse event (58%), healthcare providers who observed (23%) or were involved (19%) in an incident reported higher levels of anxiety and secondary traumatic stress. Those who were involved in an event reported higher levels of depression and burnout. Differences between the three groups (no event, observation and involvement) for compassion satisfaction were non-significant. Perceived coworker support moderated the association between experiencing an event and both anxiety and depression. Specifically, experiencing an event was associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression when coworkers were perceived as low in supportiveness, but not when they were viewed as highly supportive. Conclusion Findings suggest that errors or adverse events can have a harmful impact on healthcare providers and that coworker support may reduce emotional distress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]