1. Do Motor–Cognitive and Motor–Motor Dual-Task Training Differently Affect Dual-Task Interference in Individuals With Intellectual Disability?
- Author
-
Borji, Rihab, Baccouch, Rym, Laatar, Rabeb, Falhi, Sirine, Sahli, Sonia, and Rebai, Haithem
- Subjects
MOTOR ability ,REPEATED measures design ,HUMAN multitasking ,TASK performance ,MILD cognitive impairment ,DATA analysis ,EDUCATIONAL outcomes ,STATISTICAL sampling ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,MULTIVARIATE analysis ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,PSYCHOLOGY of movement ,INTELLECTUAL disabilities ,CONTROL groups ,PRE-tests & post-tests ,STATISTICAL reliability ,ONE-way analysis of variance ,STATISTICS ,ANALYSIS of variance ,DATA analysis software ,COGNITION ,PEOPLE with disabilities ,POSTURAL balance ,PHYSICAL mobility - Abstract
This study explored the effect of different dual-task (DT) training programs on DT interference in adults with intellectual disability. Center-of-pressure (CoP) mean velocity in single-task (ST) and cognitive-DT conditions and the Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUGT) during ST, cognitive-DT, and motor-DT conditions were assessed before and after intervention in a cognitive–motor training group, a motor–motor training group, and a control group. Before training, CoP mean velocity and TUGT time increased (p <.001) in DT compared with the ST condition. After training, the CoP mean velocity values remained unchanged (p =.07) in DT compared with the ST condition among the cognitive–motor training group. Furthermore, compared with the ST condition, no increase (p = 1) was reported in the TUGT time during the cognitive-DT condition for the cognitive–motor training group and during the motor-DT for the motor–motor training group (p =.12). The effect of DT training on DT interference depends on the training modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF