Search

Background Angioedema occurs in up to 2% of those taking angiotensin-converting enzyme ( ACE) inhibitors. Upper airway angioedema may potentially require endotracheal intubation or cricothyrotomy, and is usually unresponsive to adrenaline. The bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant is proven to be effective in the treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema, and has also been reported effective in the treatment of angioedema associated with ACE inhibitors. Aim To describe the use of icatibant for ACE inhibitor-associated airway angioedema. Methods We treated 13 consecutive emergency department ( ED) patients, who had not improved with adrenaline and/or corticosteroids, with icatibant 30 mg subcutaneously for ACE inhibitor-associated upper respiratory tract angioedema according to an agreed protocol. Results Four patients were intubated in the ED either before or after receiving icatibant; three of these were extubated within 24 h of treatment. Eight patients received early icatibant and did not require intubation. The time from onset of airway angioedema to ED presentation ranged from 1 h to 3 days (median 4 h); from ED presentation to receiving icatibant, from 30 minutes to 3 days (median 3 h); and to onset of symptom improvement after icatibant, 15 minutes to 7 h (median 2 h). One patient received a second dose of icatibant. Conclusion All patients improved after receiving icatibant, consistent with its bradykinin receptor blocking mechanism. Icatibant rapidly reversed symptoms, and appeared to avert the need for intubation or expedite extubation. Timely use of icatibant in ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema may avert the need for invasive airway procedures and intensive care unit admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Churg- Strauss syndrome ( CSS) is a rare, idiopathic systemic vasculitis. There is emerging evidence of an association between the presence or absence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies ( ANCA) and clinical phenotype. Thromboembolism is an increasingly recognised complication of the disease. Aims Given the paucity of Australian data, the aim of this study was to examine the clinical and laboratory features of CSS in a single Australian centre. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for CSS managed at the Department of Immunology, Royal Adelaide Hospital between 2002 and 2008. Results Nineteen patients were included. All patients had asthma and most had upper airway involvement. Peripheral nerve, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal and cutaneous involvement was common. Renal and cardiac involvement was uncommon in this series. Histological confirmation was obtained in 15 patients (78.9%). Ten patients (52.6%) were ANCA+, and these were more likely to have musculoskeletal involvement, such as arthralgia or myalgia (odds ratio 57, P = 0.005). Thrombosis was a feature at diagnosis in six patients (31.6%); two of these recurred with relapse. Sixteen patients (84.2%) were followed up; five died, and mean survival was 8.9 years. Conclusions This is the first Australian study to focus on CSS. Our results demonstrate similar presentation and prognosis of CSS to previous descriptions; however, we noted that musculoskeletal involvement was more common in ANCA+ patients. In our series, thrombosis was a significant complication and we suggest that thromboprophylaxis may be warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Urticaria, angioedema and anaphylaxis are common adverse reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Aim: To investigate the clinical characteristics of NSAID-induced acute hypersensitivity reactions with structured oral drug challenges. Methods: Patients with NSAID-induced urticaria, angioedema or anaphylaxis were challenged with either the homologous NSAID to confirm diagnosis or a heterologous NSAID to investigate cross-reactivity. Data were analysed retrospectively and supplemented by a telephone questionnaire. Results: Sixty-eight patients (mean age 48.3, 53 females) reported a total of 75 instances of NSAID-induced reactions of which 64% were purely cutaneous and 36% were systemic anaphylaxis. Ibuprofen was the most frequent cause of reactions (35%), however, diclofenac was the most frequent cause of anaphylaxis (48%). Seventeen out of 40 (43%) homologous NSAID challenges were positive; presentation with anaphylaxis or reaction to diclofenac predicted a positive challenge. Only 7 of 28 (25%) of heterologous NSAID challenges were positive. Structured challenges enabled us to identify 23 (34%) patients with selective reactivity to a single NSAID, 19 (28%) patients with cross-reactivity to multiple NSAIDs and 23 (34%) patients in whom NSAID hypersensitivity was not reproduced. Selective reactors presented most often with anaphylaxis and some had a background of beta-lactam antibiotic allergy. Cross-reactive patients often had a background of chronic urticaria and presented with milder reactions. Conclusion: In the absence of a reliable in vitro test, structured drug challenges allow identification of selective and cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity syndromes. NSAID-induced anaphylaxis is often associated with selective hypersensitivity and patients may not need to avoid other NSAIDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]