Search

In resource-limited settings, the standard of care prescribed in developed countries for either operative or nonoperative management of traumatic intracranial hematomas (TICHs) frequently has to be adapted to the economic and infrastructural realities. This study aims to present the outcome of selected cases of TICHs managed nonoperatively without routine intensive care unit admission, repeated cranial computed tomography (CT) scan or intracranial pressure monitoring at a rural neurosurgical service in a developing country. This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of our patients with cranial CT-confirmed TICHs selected for nonoperative treatment from our prospective head injury (HI) register over a 42-month period. There were 67 patients (51 males) in this study with a mean age of 38.6 (standard deviation, 17.6) years, having mild HI in >half, (55.2%, 37/67) and anisocoria in 22.4% (15/67). Road traffic accident was the most common (50/67, 74.7%) trauma etiology. Isolated acute-subdural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and epidural hematoma occurred in 29.9%, 25.4%, and 22.4% of the patients respectively. Only 2 of 8 patients in whom intensive care unit admission was deemed necessary could afford admission. Repeat cranial CT scan was requested in 8 patients (8/67, 11.9%); only 5 of these could afford the investigation. The outcome of care was good in 82.1% patients (55/67). Increasing severity of the HI (P < 0.01) and presence of pupillary abnormality (P = 0.03) were significant predictors of poor outcome. In a Nigerian rural neurosurgery practice, nonoperative management of a well-selected cohort of TICHs was attended by acceptable level of favorable outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In Nigeria, pre-neurosurgical care of most neurotrauma patients usually involves administration of many empirical agents including antibiotics with no apparent indications. This practice is fraught with two particular dangers: increase in health care costs and development of drug resistance. This study aimed to interrogate antibiotic stewardship in the pre-neurosurgical care of neurotrauma patients referred to our practice. Materials and Methods This 7-month prospective descriptive study was performed in one University Teaching Hospital of a developing country. Clinical data on all admitted neurotrauma patients with information on the pre-neurosurgical treatment received were captured and analyzed. Results There were 113 patients, 87(77.0%) males; 103(91.2%) had head injury, and 10(8.8%) spinal cord injury. Associated systemic injuries occurred in 47(41.6%): 40 involved skeletal and soft tissue systems, and 12(10.6%) presented with aspiration pneumonitis. These patients were referrals from public health facilities including primary health facilities (PHF), secondary (SHF), and tertiary (THF), as well as private clinics (PC). Antibiotics were given to 74 (65.5%) patients, with a probabilistic indication in only 17.6% (13/74) of these. The proportional distribution of this antibiotic administration according to the referral base was not statistically significant (χ 2 =6.87, p = 0.3): 70% (14/20) from PHF, 56% (14/25) from SHF, 71% (23/32) from THF, and 63% (23/36) from PC. The antimicrobial agent administered was specified in 40 cases: Ceftriaxone was the commonest antibiotic agent implicated. Conclusion There is apparent unnecessary exposure of patients to antibiotics in the pre-neurosurgical care of neurotrauma in this study. There is, therefore, need for education on antibiotic stewardship to the group of health workers involved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]