Search

Ni‐CeO2 nanoparticles (NPs) are promising nanocatalysts for water splitting and water gas shift reactions due to the ability of ceria to temporarily donate oxygen to the catalytic reaction and accept oxygen after the reaction is completed. Therefore, elucidating how different properties of the Ni‐Ceria NPs relate to the activity and selectivity of the catalytic reaction, is of crucial importance for the development of novel catalysts. In this work the active learning (AL) method based on machine learning regression and its uncertainty is used for the global optimization of Ce(4‐x)NixO(8‐x) (x = 1, 2, 3) nanoparticles, employing density functional theory calculations. Additionally, further investigation of the NPs by mass‐scaled parallel‐tempering Born‐Oppenheimer molecular dynamics resulted in the same putative global minimum structures found by AL, demonstrating the robustness of our AL search to learn from small datasets and assist in the global optimization of complex electronic structure systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reinforcement learning (RL) methods have helped to define the state of the art in the field of modern artificial intelligence, mostly after the breakthrough involving AlphaGo and the discovery of novel algorithms. In this work, we present a RL method, based on Q‐learning, for the structural determination of adsorbate@substrate models in silico, where the minimization of the energy landscape resulting from adsorbate interactions with a substrate is made by actions on states (translations and rotations) chosen from an agent's policy. The proposed RL method is implemented in an early version of the reinforcement learning software for materials design and discovery (RLMaterial), developed in Python3.x. RLMaterial interfaces with deMon2k, DFTB+, ORCA, and Quantum Espresso codes to compute the adsorbate@substrate energies. The RL method was applied for the structural determination of (i) the amino acid glycine and (ii) 2‐amino‐acetaldehyde, both interacting with a boron nitride (BN) monolayer, (iii) host‐guest interactions between phenylboronic acid and β‐cyclodextrin and (iv) ammonia on naphthalene. Density functional tight binding calculations were used to build the complex search surfaces with a reasonably low computational cost for systems (i)–(iii) and DFT for system (iv). Artificial neural network and gradient boosting regression techniques were employed to approximate the Q‐matrix or Q‐table for better decision making (policy) on next actions. Finally, we have developed a transfer‐learning protocol within the RL framework that allows learning from one chemical system and transferring the experience to another, as well as from different DFT or DFTB levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

deMon2k is a readily available program specialized in Density Functional Theory (DFT) simulations within the framework of Auxiliary DFT. This article is intended as a tutorial-review of the capabilities of the program for molecular simulations involving ground and excited electronic states. The program implements an additive QM/MM (quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics) module relying either on non-polarizable or polarizable force fields. QM/MM methodologies available in deMon2k include ground-state geometry optimizations, ground-state Born–Oppenheimer molecular dynamics simulations, Ehrenfest non-adiabatic molecular dynamics simulations, and attosecond electron dynamics. In addition several electric and magnetic properties can be computed with QM/MM. We review the framework implemented in the program, including the most recently implemented options (link atoms, implicit continuum for remote environments, metadynamics, etc.), together with six applicative examples. The applications involve (i) a reactivity study of a cyclic organic molecule in water; (ii) the establishment of free-energy profiles for nucleophilic-substitution reactions by the umbrella sampling method; (iii) the construction of two-dimensional free energy maps by metadynamics simulations; (iv) the simulation of UV-visible absorption spectra of a solvated chromophore molecule; (v) the simulation of a free energy profile for an electron transfer reaction within Marcus theory; and (vi) the simulation of fragmentation of a peptide after collision with a high-energy proton. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]