Search

Para evaluar el efecto de dos estrategias alimentarias y presencia de sustrato para perifiton sobre el perfil de ácidos grasos, características sensoriales y microbiológicas en filetes de tilapia y bocachico, se realizó un policultivo bajo un diseño factorial 2x2 con tres réplicas. El primer factor, A1: alimento con 20% de proteína bruta (PB) y A2: alimentación con niveles decrecientes de PB, (38, 32, 24 y 20%). El segundo factor B1: presencia y B2: ausencia de sustrato para perifiton. Al final de un periodo de cultivo de ocho meses fueron analizados los filetes de las dos especies. Las muestras cumplieron con los parámetros microbiológicos del INVIMA. No hubo diferencias significativas sensoriales entre tratamientos. En tilapia, la estrategia alimentaria tuvo efectos sobre el perfil de ácidos grasos, no en bocachico. En bocachico se encontraron relaciones Ω-6/Ω-3 de 0,7±0,12, en tilapia de 3,9±1,2 y en perifiton de 0,7±0,007. Por la relación Ω-6/Ω-3 menor a 1 y la presencia de DHA y EPA, el bocachico reúne características para ser identificado como un alimento funcional. El perifiton presentó niveles altos de ALA, siendo una fuente apropiada para peces. Tilapia tiene más alta relación de Ω-6: Ω-3, pero con adecuados niveles de DHA y EPA.Para avaliar o efeito de duas estratégias alimentarias e a presença de substrato para perifiton no perfil dos ácidos graxos, características sensoriais e microbiológicas dos files de tilápia e bocachico, foi feito um policultivo sob um desenho fatorial 2x2 com três repetições. O primeiro fator com dois níveis, A1: alimento de 20% de proteína bruta (PB) e A2: alimentação com níveis decrescentes de PB, (38, 32, 24 y 20%). O segundo fator B1: presença e B2: ausência de substrato para perifiton. No final do cultivo de oito meses, foram analisados os filés das duas espécies. Todas as amostras tiveram os parâmetros microbiológicos segundo o INVIMA. No painel sensorial não se encontraram diferenças significativas entre os tratamentos. Em tilapia, a estratégia alimentaria teve efeitos no perfil de ácidos graxos, mas não em bocachico. Em bocachico se encontraram relações Ω-6/Ω-3 de 0,7±0,12, em tilapia de 3,9±1,2 e no perifiton de 0,7±0,007. Pela relação Ω-6/Ω-3 e a presença de DHA e EPA, o bocachico tem características para ser identificado como um alimento funcional. O perifiton apresentou níveis altos de ALA, sendo uma fonte apropriada para peixes. Tilápia tem mais alta relação de Ω-6/Ω-3, mas com bons níveis de DHA e EPA.To evaluate the effect of two feeding strategies and the presence of substrate for periphyton on the fatty acid profile, sensory and microbiological characteristics in tilapia and bocachico fillets, we performed a polyculture under a 2x2 factorial design with 3 replicates. The first factor with two levels, A1: food with 20% crude protein [CP] and A2: a meal plan with decreasing levels of PB, (38, 32, 24 and 20%). The second factor B1 substrate and B2 absence of substrate for periphyton. At the end of the cultivation of eight months were analyzed both fish fillets. All samples met the standard microbiological parameters as INVIMA. The sensory panel found no significant differences between treatments. There was no effect of the presence of substrate on fatty acid profile in fish. In tilapia, the feeding strategy had effect on fatty acid profile, not in bocachico. Ω-6/Ω-3 ratio was 0.7 ± 0.12 in bocachico, in tilapia was 3.9 ± 1.2 and 0.7 ± 0.007 for periphyton. Ω-6/Ω-3 ratio was less than 1 and the presence of DHA and EPA, bocachico can be identified as a functional food. Periphyton showed high levels of ALA, which makes it an appropriate source for fish. Tilapia has a higher ratio of Ω-6/Ω-3, but with good levels of DHA and EPA.

To evaluate the effect of two feeding strategies and the presence of substrate for periphyton on the fatty acid profile, sensory and microbiological characteristics in tilapia and bocachico fillets, we performed a polyculture under a 2x2 factorial design with 3 replicates. The first factor with two levels, A1: food with 20% crude protein [CP] and A2: a meal plan with decreasing levels of PB, (38, 32,24 and 20%). The second factor B1 substrate and B2 absence of substrate for periphyton. At the end of the cultivation of eight months were analyzed both fish fillets. All samples met the standard microbiological parameters as INVIMA. The sensory panel found no significant differences between treatments. There was no effect of the presence of substrate on fatty acid profile in fish. In tilapia, the feeding strategy had effects on the fatty acid profile. Ω-6/Ω-3 ratio was 0.7 ± 0.12 in bocachico, in tilapia was 3.9 ± 1.2 and 0.7 ± 0.007 for periphyton. Ω-6/Ω-3 ratio was less than 1 and the presence of DHA and EPA, bocachico can be identified as a functional food. Periphyton showed high levels of ALA, which makes it an appropriate source for fish. Tilapia has a higher ratio of Ω-6/Ω-3, but with good levels of DHA and EPA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]