Search

Objective: The authors compared results and morbidity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients undergoing preemptive pancreas transplantation (PTx) either before dialysis or before the need for a kidney transplant with IDDM patients undergoing conventional combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) after the initiation of dialysis therapy., Summary Background Data: Combined PKT has become accepted generally as the best treatment option in carefully selected IDDM patients who either are dependent on dialysis or for whom dialysis is imminent. With improving results, the timing of PKT relative to the degree of nephropathy is evolving. However, it is not well established that the advantages of preemptive PTx can be achieved without incurring a detrimental effect on graft function or survival., Methods: Over a 4-year study period, data on the following 3 recipient groups were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively: 1) 38 IDDM patients undergoing combined PKT while on dialysis (PKT:D); 2) 44 IDDM patients undergoing preemptive PKT before dialysis (PKT:ND); and 3) 20 IDDM patients undergoing solitary PTx. All patients underwent whole organ PTx with bladder drainage and were treated with quadruple immunosuppression., Results: Actuarial 1-year patient survival is 100%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. One-year actuarial PTx survival (insulin-independence) is 92%, 95%, and 78%, respectively. The incidence of rejection, infection, operative complications, readmissions, and total hospital days was similar in the three groups. Long-term renal and pancreas allograft function and quality of life were similarly comparable. Rehabilitation potential favored the solitary PTx and PKT:ND groups., Conclusions: Preemptive PKT or solitary PTx performed earlier in the course of diabetes is associated with good results, facilitated rehabilitation, and may prevent further diabetic complications.

Background: Vascularized pancreas transplantation (PTx) for type I diabetes mellitus results in euglycemia at the expense of chronic immunosuppression, hyperinsulinemia, and dyslipidemia. However, the effect of PTx on native biliary lithogenesis remains unknown., Methods: To address this issue, we retrospectively studied 72 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients and compared them with patients both with (n = 35) and without (n = 52) diabetes mellitus undergoing kidney transplantation alone (KTA). All patients underwent pretransplantation abdominal ultrasonography, which was repeated at 6- to 12-month intervals after transplantation. PTx recipients were managed with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Kidney transplant recipients received cyclosporine and prednisone., Results: Seventeen (30.4%) of 56 evaluable PTx recipients had gallstones at a mean interval of 13 months (range, 5 to 24) after PTx. Eleven patients underwent open cholecystectomy (with one surgical exploration of common bile duct for choledocholithiasis), three underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the other three are being managed expectantly. Gallstone analysis revealed predominantly cholesterol stones. The incidence of cholelithiasis in kidney transplant recipients with and without diabetes mellitus was 27.3% and 12.2%, respectively (p = 0.04)., Conclusions: Pancreas transplant and kidney transplant recipients with diabetes are predisposed to the development of gallstones compared with recipients without diabetes. An interaction between diabetes mellitus-induced gallbladder dysmotility and cyclosporine-induced cholestasis may be a possible mechanism. We recommend serial ultrasonographic examinations in pancreas transplant and kidney transplant recipients, and cholecystectomy in pancreas transplant recipients with cholelithiasis should be considered.

Currently, diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of renal failure in adults. However, combined pancreatic and renal transplantation (PRT) remains controversial when compared with renal transplantation alone (RTA) in diabetic recipients. We analyzed the results and morbidity in four age-matched groups--31 patients with Type I diabetes undergoing PRT before dialysis, 30 patients with diabetes who are dependent of dialysis undergoing PRT, 31 concurrent and historic patients with Type I diabetes undergoing RTA and 31 concurrent patients without diabetes undergoing RTA. All patients received cadaver donor organs and were managed with cyclosporine and prednisone immunosuppression with selective OKT3 induction. The four groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, duration and severity of diabetes, dialysis type, number of retransplants, degree of sensitization, preservation time and matching. The groups differed with regard to duration of dialysis and period of follow-up evaluation, pretransplant blood transfusions, racial distribution and OKT3 induction therapy. PRT was associated with a greater morbidity rate as evidenced by a slightly higher incidence of rejection, infections and reoperations. The number of readmissions and hospitalization period during the first 12 months was also greater after PRT versus RTA. However, none of these differences were significant. No detrimental effect was noted on renal allograft function at one year; patient and graft survival was actually higher in the PRT groups. Quality of life was improved in nearly 90 percent of PRT recipients. Although the improved results after PRT may be attributed to selection bias, only lesser differences were noted among the four study groups. The aforementioned data suggest that appropriate patient selection can overcome the morbidity associated with PRT, resulting in excellent patient and graft survival with the potential for complete rehabilitation.

Although combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) has become a valid treatment option for selected type I diabetics, the timing of PKT relative to the degree of nephropathy remains controversial. We analyzed results and morbidity in 30 type I diabetics undergoing PKT after starting dialysis (PKT:D) versus 31 type I diabetics undergoing PKT prior to dialysis (PKT:ND). The two groups were similar with the respect to age, duration and severity of diabetes, gender, race, preservation time, retransplants, sensitization, HLA-matching, and CMV status. The mean preoperative serum creatinine was higher in the PKT:D group (9.9 +/- 3.4 vs. 3.9 +/- 1.9 mg/dl PKT:ND, P < 0.01). All patients were managed with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Actuarial patient survival is 100% (PKT:D) and 96.8% (PKT:ND). Renal and pancreas allograft survival are 97% and 93%, respectively, in both groups. The incidence of rejection, infection, operative complications, reflux pancreatitis, and total hospital days was similar in both groups. Long-term renal and pancreas allograft function and quality of life were like-wise comparable. No adverse coagulation or immunologic effects were noted in the PKT:ND group. Rehabilitation potential favored the PKT:ND group. PKT can be performed safely and effectively in the absence of uremia. In selected type I diabetics with significant nephropathy, we believe that PKT is the best treatment option and need not be considered as preemptive, especially in view of increasing waiting times and the variable progressive nature of diabetic complications.