Search

OBJECTIVE To search for a better dietary approach to treat postprandial lipid abnormalities and improve glucose control in type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS According to a randomized crossover design, 18 type 2 diabetic patients (aged 59 ± 5 years; BMI 27 ± 3 kg/m2) (means ± SD) in satisfactory blood glucose control on diet or diet plus metformin followed a diet relatively rich in carbohydrates (52% total energy), rich in fiber (28g/1,000 kcal), and with a low glycemic index (58%) (high-carbohydrate/high-fiber diet) or a diet relatively low in carbohydrate (45%) and rich in monounsaturated fat (23%) (low-carbohydrate/high–monounsaturated fat diet) for 4 weeks. Thereafter, they shifted to the other diet for 4 more weeks. At the end of each period, plasma glucose, insulin, lipids, and lipoprotein fractions (separated by discontinuous density gradient ultracentrifugation) were determined on blood samples taken at fasting and over 6 h after a test meal having a similar composition as the corresponding diet. RESULTS In addition to a significant decrease in postprandial plasma glucose, insulin responses, and glycemic variability, the high-carbohydrate/high-fiber diet also significantly improved the primary end point, since it reduced the postprandial incremental areas under the curve (IAUCs) of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, in particular, chylomicrons (cholesterol IAUC: 0.05 ± 0.01 vs. 0.08 ± 0.02 mmol/l per 6 h; triglycerides IAUC: 0.71 ± 0.35 vs. 1.03 ± 0.58 mmol/l per 6 h, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A diet rich in carbohydrate and fiber, essentially based on legumes, vegetables, fruits, and whole cereals, may be particularly useful for treating diabetic patients because of its multiple effects on different cardiovascular risk factors, including postprandial lipids abnormalities.

The aim of this study was to evaluate exogenous and endogenous lipoprotein responses to a standard fat-rich meal in type 2 diabetic patients with optimal fasting triglyceridemia and optimal blood glucose control. Seven type 2 diabetic patients and five nondiabetic controls (age, 49 +/- 7 and 48 +/- 4 yr; body mass index, 28.3 +/- 3.6 and 25.1 +/- 3.6 kg/m(2); mean +/- SD) were given, after at least 12 h of fasting, a standard fat-rich meal. Before and over the 6 h after the meal, serial blood samples were taken for determination of glucose, insulin, lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoprotein B-48 (apo B-48), apo B-100, free fatty acids, and lipoprotein lipase activity. The main abnormality in the postprandial lipid response of diabetic patients involved large very low density lipoproteins. In these particles, apo B-48, apo B-100, cholesterol, and triglyceride incremental areas were, in fact, significantly higher in diabetics compared with controls [7.08 +/- 2.65 vs. 1.17 +/- 0.88 mg/liter.h, 65.5 +/- 11.5 vs. 12.4 +/- 1.77 mg/liter.h, 29.7 +/- 3.9 vs. 13.1 +/- 3.1 mg/dl.h (0.77 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.08 mmol/liter.h), 170 +/- 31 vs. 94 +/- 22 mg/dl.h (1.93 +/- 0.35 vs. 1.06 +/- 0.25 mmol/liter.h)] (all P0.05; mean +/- SEM). Postprandial preheparin lipoprotein lipase plasma activity was, if anything, higher in diabetic patients. In conclusion, even with fasting normotriglyceridemia and optimal blood glucose control, type 2 diabetic patients are characterized, in the postprandial period, by a significant increase in large very low density lipoproteins of both endogenous and exogenous origins.

To improve the quality of diabetes care, a project of integrated diabetes management (PIDM) involving some general practitioner (GPs) has been recently undertaken. The purpose of this study is to compare features and treatment of patients followed by diabetic outpatient clinics (DOCs) with those cared for by GPs trained to the PIDM. Twenty-one DOCs and eleven GPs participated in the study. Patients followed by DOCs (n. = 1110) showed longer duration of diabetes, higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome than patients followed by GPs (n. = 305). More patients followed in DOCs performed insulin therapy, while a lower number received ACE /angiotensin blockers, antiplatelet, lipid lowering drugs and multifactorial intervention than patients followed by GPs. The proportion of patients in good control for glucose, pressure and lipid levels was similar in the two groups. Conversely, a higher number of patients attending DOCs were in poor glycemic, pressure, and lipid control compared with patients followed by GPs. In conclusions, PIDM provides satisfactory results in terms of overall glucose, pressure and lipid control, thus encouraging implementation of PIDM to meet the increasing demand for diabetes care.

We investigated postprandial plasma and adipose tissue (AT) adiponectin changes in relation to obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fasting and 6 hours after a standard fat-rich meal blood samples (adiponectin, glucose, insulin, lipids) and needle biopsies of abdominal subcutaneous AT (adiponectin messenger RNA, lipoprotein lipase activity) were taken in 10 obese diabetic (OD), 11 obese nondiabetic (OND), and 11 normal-weight control (C) men. The OD and OND subjects had similar adiposity (body mass index, waist circumference) and insulin resistance (hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp). Fasting plasma adiponectin and AT gene expression were not significantly different between groups. After meal, plasma adiponectin decreased in OD but significantly increased in OND and C, the changes being significantly different between groups (analysis of variance, P = .01); adiponectin messenger RNA decreased in OD (-0.27 +/- 0.25 AU, P = .01) but was unchanged in OND (P = .59) and C (P = .45). After meal, plasma adiponectin correlated inversely with triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations in chylomicrons and large very low-density lipoprotein, and directly with AT lipoprotein lipase activity (P < .05 for all). Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with lower postprandial plasma levels and AT gene expression of adiponectin independently of degree of adiposity and whole-body insulin sensitivity. In patients with diabetes, this may exacerbate postprandial abnormalities of lipoprotein metabolism.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postprandial lipoprotein abnormalities in type 2 diabetes are associated with insulin resistance. The role of other diabetes-related factors is still not clear. The aim of this study is to differentiate the effects of whole-body insulin resistance, obesity, and type 2 diabetes on postprandial dyslipidaemia and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) in adipose tissue. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten subjects with obesity and diabetes (OD), 11 with obesity alone (O), and 11 normal-weight controls (C) - males, aged 26-59 years, with fasting normo-triglyceridaemia underwent measurements of cholesterol, triglycerides, apo B-48 and apo B-100 concentrations in plasma lipoproteins separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation before and after a fat-rich meal. Fasting and postprandial (6h) LPL activity was determined in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsy samples. Insulin sensitivity was measured by hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. OD and O subjects had similar degrees of adiposity (BMI, waist circumference, fat mass) and insulin resistance (insulin stimulated glucose disposal and M/I). They also showed a similarly higher postprandial increase in large VLDL lipids (triglyceride incremental AUC 188+/-28 and 135+/-22 mg/dl.6h) than C (87+/-13 mg/dl.6h, M+/-SEM, p

Objective— To evaluate the role of insulin resistance in development of postprandial dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetic patients in an experimental setting in which these patients were compared with nondiabetic subjects at similar glucose and insulin blood levels. Methods and Results— Eight type 2 diabetic patients in optimal blood glucose control and 7 control subjects (aged 50.0±2.6 and 48.1±1.3 years; body mass index 28.3±1.2 and 25.6±1.1 kg/m 2 ; fasting plasma triglycerides 1.12±0.13 and 0.87±0.08 mmol/L, respectively; mean±SEM; NS) consumed a mixed meal during an 8-hour hyperinsulinemic glycemic clamp. Mean blood glucose during clamp was ≈7.8 mmol/L, and plasma insulin during the preprandial steady state was ≈480 pmol/L in both groups, that differed for insulin sensitivity (M/I value lower in diabetic subjects [1.65±0.30 and 3.42±0.60; P P P P Conclusions— Insulin resistance is also associated with postprandial lipoprotein abnormalities in type 2 diabetes after acute correction for hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia.