Search

Objectives: To describe the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Australian patients with diabetes; to compare the effectiveness of a quality improvement initiative for people with and without diabetes., Research Design and Methods: Subgroup analyses of patients with and without diabetes participating in a cluster randomised trial., Setting and Participants: Indigenous people (≥ 35 years old) and non-Indigenous people (≥ 45 years old) who had attended one of 60 Australian primary health care services at least three times during the preceding 24 months and at least once during the past 6 months., Intervention: Quality improvement initiative comprising point-of-care electronic decision support with audit and feedback tools., Main Outcome Measures: Adherence to CVD risk screening and prescribing guidelines., Results: Baseline rates of guideline-recommended screening were higher for 8829 patients with diabetes than for 44 335 without diabetes (62.0% v 39.5%; P < 0.001). Baseline rates of guideline-recommended prescribing were greater for patients with diabetes than for other patients at high risk of CVD (55.5% v 39.6%; P < 0.001). The proportions of patients with diabetes not attaining recommended treatment targets for blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol or HbA1c levels who were not prescribed the corresponding therapy at baseline were 28%, 44% and 24% respectively. The intervention was associated with improved screening rates, but the effect was smaller for patients with diabetes than for those without diabetes (rate ratio [RR], 1.14 v 1.28; P = 0.01). It was associated with improved guideline-recommended prescribing only for undertreated individuals at high risk; the effect size was similar for those with and without diabetes (RR, 1.63 v 1.53; P = 0.28)., Conclusions: Adherence to CVD risk management guidelines was better for people with diabetes, but there is room for improvement. The intervention was modestly effective in people with diabetes, but further strategies are needed to close evidence-practice gaps.Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN12611000478910.

Background: Communities in rural Andhra Pradesh may be at increasing risk of diabetes. In the present study we analyzed three cross-sectional studies over 9 years to estimate the changing prevalence of dysglycemia (diabetes and prediabetes)., Methods: The 2005 study sampled 4535 individuals from 20 villages, the 2010 study sampled 4024 individuals from 14 villages, and the 2014 project of 62 254 individuals sought to include all adults aged 40-85 years from 54 villages. Blood glucose levels were estimated using a hand-held device in 2005 and 2014 and using HbA1c dried blood spots in 2010., Results: In primary analyses restricted to assays based on fasting samples (2005, n = 3243; 2014, n = 749), the prevalence estimates for dysglycemia were 53.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.8%-55.7%) in 2005 and 62.0% (95% CI 58.5%-65.4%) in 2014 (P < 0.001). Over the same period, mean body mass index (BMI) increased from 22.2 to 24.3 kg/m 2 (mean difference 2.1 kg/m 2 ; 95% CI 2.0-2.2 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.001). In secondary analyses using data from all participants (2005, n = 4535; 2010, n = 4024; 2014, n = 62 254), regardless of measurement technique, the estimated prevalence of dysglycemia was 53.9% (95% CI 52.0%-55.9%) in 2005, 50.5% (95% CI 46.1%-54.9%) in 2010, and 41.3% (95% CI 40.9%-41.7%) in 2014 (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The prevalence of dysglycemia was high at every assessment using every measurement method. Dysglycemia in this population is most likely to have risen with the rise in BMI. The decline in prevalence suggested by the secondary analyses was likely due to confounding from the different assessment methods., (© 2015 Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Asian Indians appear particularly susceptible to coronary heart disease compared with other ethnic groups. We compared the effects of vascular risk factors on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in a population of South Asians from Andhra Pradesh, India with a population of Caucasians from Perth, Australia. Cardiovascular risk factors and ultrasound-assessed carotid IMT were measured in randomly selected adults from two villages in rural India (n=303) and compared to those for randomly sampled adults from Australia (n=1111). Regression models with interaction terms were used to compare the strengths of associations between risk factors and carotid IMT, in these two populations. There were stronger associations of cholesterol (p for interaction=0.009) and diabetes (p=0.04) with carotid IMT in the Indian compared to the Australian population. Also, while increasing HDL-cholesterol was associated with decreasing carotid IMT in the Australian population the reverse was true for the Indian population (p<0.001). The associations with IMT of blood pressure, triglycerides, age, HDL to total cholesterol ratio, glucose, BMI, waist, waist to hip ratio and smoking were not different between the populations. Greater adverse effects of total cholesterol and diabetes on atherosclerosis and no protective effect of HDL-cholesterol amongst Asian Indians provide a novel possible explanation for observed excess rates of cardiovascular disease amongst these populations.

Background: Clinical practice guidelines have traditionally recommended blood pressure treatment based primarily on blood pressure thresholds. In contrast, using predicted cardiovascular risk has been advocated as a more effective strategy to guide treatment decisions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. We aimed to compare outcomes from a blood pressure-lowering treatment strategy based on predicted cardiovascular risk with one based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) level.Methods and Findings: We used individual participant data from the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (BPLTTC) from 1995 to 2013. Trials randomly assigned participants to either blood pressure-lowering drugs versus placebo or more intensive versus less intensive blood pressure-lowering regimens. We estimated 5-y risk of CVD events using a multivariable Weibull model previously developed in this dataset. We compared the two strategies at specific SBP thresholds and across the spectrum of risk and blood pressure levels studied in BPLTTC trials. The primary outcome was number of CVD events avoided per persons treated. We included data from 11 trials (47,872 participants). During a median of 4.0 y of follow-up, 3,566 participants (7.5%) experienced a major cardiovascular event. Areas under the curve comparing the two treatment strategies throughout the range of possible thresholds for CVD risk and SBP demonstrated that, on average, a greater number of CVD events would be avoided for a given number of persons treated with the CVD risk strategy compared with the SBP strategy (area under the curve 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.72] for the CVD risk strategy versus 0.54 [95% CI 0.53-0.55] for the SBP strategy). Compared with treating everyone with SBP ≥ 150 mmHg, a CVD risk strategy would require treatment of 29% (95% CI 26%-31%) fewer persons to prevent the same number of events or would prevent 16% (95% CI 14%-18%) more events for the same number of persons treated. Compared with treating everyone with SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, a CVD risk strategy would require treatment of 3.8% (95% CI 12.5% fewer to 7.2% more) fewer persons to prevent the same number of events or would prevent 3.1% (95% CI 1.5%-5.0%) more events for the same number of persons treated, although the former estimate was not statistically significant. In subgroup analyses, the CVD risk strategy did not appear to be more beneficial than the SBP strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus or established CVD.Conclusions: A blood pressure-lowering treatment strategy based on predicted cardiovascular risk is more effective than one based on blood pressure levels alone across a range of thresholds. These results support using cardiovascular risk assessment to guide blood pressure treatment decision-making in moderate- to high-risk individuals, particularly for primary prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]