1. Randomized Double-blind Cost-effectiveness Comparison of Two 10% Urea Creams in Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome.
- Author
-
Tejeda Ramírez S, Tardáguila-García A, López-Moral M, Sanz-Corbalán I, García-Madrid M, and Lázaro-Martínez JL
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Double-Blind Method, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Aged, Longitudinal Studies, Treatment Outcome, Diabetic Foot drug therapy, Diabetic Foot economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Urea therapeutic use, Skin Cream therapeutic use
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two 10% urea creams in patients with diabetic foot syndrome., Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal, single-center, randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial that evaluated the skin quality of 20 feet belonging to 10 patients with diabetic foot syndrome after the application of two 10% urea creams purchased from pharmacies and supermarkets., Results: At follow-up, 19 (95%) of the participants' feet showed improved skin quality, irrespective of the cream applied. On visual inspection, participants had a decreased presence of xerosis, hyperkeratosis, and preulcerative signs such as subkeratotic bruising and areas of redness on the dorsum of the toes. At the 3-month follow-up, nine (90%) of the participants stated that they had continued to apply the cream as a method of self-management to prevent complications., Conclusions: Creams containing 10% urea purchased in supermarkets improve foot skin quality in patients with diabetic foot syndrome, regardless of their cost. Based on these findings, the authors recommend creams containing 10% urea as a self-management tool for patients with diabetic foot syndrome., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF