Search

The research presented addresses condylar fractures of the mandible, focusing on their complexity, diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The causes, classifications and therapeutic options of these fractures are discussed, as well as the criteria for choosing the treatment modality. Furthermore, complications associated with these fractures and preventive measures are addressed. The study highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach involving several healthcare professionals, such as oral and maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists and physiotherapists, to ensure comprehensive and effective treatment. Advances in surgical technique, the use of appropriate materials and postoperative follow-up stand out as essential elements for the adequate recovery of patients. In summary, the research emphasizes the complexity of mandibular condylar fractures and the importance of accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and ongoing care to improve patients' quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mandible is a compact and mobile bone made up of noble structures that contribute to the functionality of the stomatognathic system. Mandibular fractures can be called comminuted when they affect three or more fragmented parts in the same region. The most discussed causes come from automobile accidents, firearm projectiles, pathological scenarios, and occurrences in the workplace. The present study relates scientific evidence on the management of a comminuted fracture in the left mandibular body region to a clinical case of correct diagnosis and treatment. In view of the above, the clinical and complementary tests have demonstrated the importance of diagnosing the case report, as well as the physical examination that evaluates bone crepitation, pain, edema, dilatation of adjacent tissues, facial asymmetry, and the use of computed tomography as preand post-operatory imaging. Open reduction with submandibular extraoral access was recommended as one of the methods indicated for this type of injury, so that stabilization with 2.0 mm system plates and fixation with a 2.4 mm reconstruction plate restored the patient's function. The relevance of the professional in identifying the type of fracture and its corrective techniques present in the literature is evident, leading to a successful surgical therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]