Search

Background: Despite automated pupillometry's (AP) improved detection of relative afferent pupillary defects (RAPDs) compared with the Swinging Flashlight Test (SFT), AP remains uncommon in clinical practice. This study examined barriers to routine use of AP in evaluation of acute vision loss., Methods: (1) Ophthalmologists and optometrists' perceptions of AP were captured via electronic survey. (2) Ophthalmologists were presented with clinical vignettes to assess their use of AP in clinical decision-making. (3) Patients presenting with decreased vision to an ophthalmology urgent care clinic underwent manual SFT and AP screening to evaluate ophthalmologists' perceptions of the device., Results: Surveys indicated that clinicians were "neutral" to "somewhat likely" to use AP. In clinical vignettes, more physicians proceeded with workup for optic nerve pathology when presented with an RAPD by AP than SFT (77% vs 26%, P = 0.003). When SFT and AP results were discordant, more physicians proceeded with workup for optic nerve disease when AP was positive and SFT was negative than vice versa (61% vs 18%, P = 0.008). In the clinical study of 21 patients, 50% of RAPDs detected by AP were not detected by SFT, although ophthalmologists rated AP's usefulness as only "neutral" to "somewhat useful.", Conclusion: Clinicians value pupillary examination and trust AP over SFT; however, widespread adoption and perceived value of AP may depend on its impact on clinical outcomes. Within a comprehensive diagnostic device, AP may be an important tool, but is not necessary to screen for optic nerve disease or evaluate acute vision loss., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.)

Purpose: To determine the test-retest reliability and diagnostic accuracy of a binocular optical coherence tomography (OCT) prototype (Envision Diagnostics, El Segundo, California, USA) for pupillometry., Design: Assessment of diagnostic reliability and accuracy., Methods: Fifty participants with relative afferent pupillary defects (RAPDs) confirmed using the swinging flashlight method (mean age 49.6 years) and 50 healthy control subjects (mean age 31.3 years) were examined. Participants twice underwent an automated pupillometry examination using a binocular OCT system that presents a stimulus and simultaneously captures OCT images of the iris-pupil plane of both eyes. Participants underwent a single examination on the RAPDx (Konan Medical, Irvine, California, USA), an automated infrared pupillometer. Pupil parameters including maximum and minimum diameter, and anisocoria were measured. The magnitude of RAPD was calculated using the log of the ratio of the constriction amplitude between the eyes. A pathological RAPD was above ±0.5 log units on both devices., Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.90 for OCT-derived maximum pupil diameter, minimum pupil diameter, and anisocoria. The RAPDx had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 94% for detection of RAPD whereas the binocular OCT had a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 86%. The diagnostic accuracy of the RAPDx and binocular OCT was 88% (95% confidence interval 80%-94%) and 80% (95% confidence interval 71%-87%) respectively., Conclusions: Binocular OCT-derived pupil parameters had excellent test-retest reliability. The diagnostic accuracy of RAPD was inferior to the RAPDx and is likely related to factors such as eye movement during OCT capture. As OCT becomes ubiquitous, OCT-derived measurements may provide an efficient method of objectively quantifying the pupil responses., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Detection of a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) by the swinging-light test can be challenging in clinical practice (dark eyes, anisocoria, dark environment). We developed a new method of RAPD quantification based on the recording of the infrared pupillary asymmetry (IPA) with a standard optical coherence tomography (OCT) device., Methods: The diagnostic value of the IPA for detection of the RAPD was determined by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC)., Results: Twenty-nine subjects were included in this study (17 controls and 12 unilateral optic neuropathies). The IPA was significantly greater in unilateral optic neuropathies (0.39) compared to controls (0.18, p = 0.001). The diagnostic value was good with a ROC-AUC of 0.843. Importantly, the IPA correlated significantly with the inter-eye percentage difference of the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness (R = 0.53, p = 0.01). Assessment of the IPA took less than 30 s., Conclusion: The present data show that the IPA is a practical and rapid test that can be applied in a clinical setting. The IPA may be a valuable functional outcome measure for clinical trials, complementing structural retinal OCT data in a biological meaningful way. The IPA should be further investigated for suitability for optic neuritis treatment trials.

Purpose: To assess the correlations between the relative afferent pupillary defect measured by a binocular, computerized, and commercially available pupillometer and the inter-eye differences in average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and visual field index (VFI) and mean deviation (MD) measured by automated static perimetry in patients with glaucoma., Design: Cross-sectional study., Participants: Thirty four patients with open-angle glaucoma., Methods: Pupillary constriction amplitudes were measured with an automated pupillometer. SD-OCT imaging of the circumpapillary RNFL and automated static perimetry were performed within 6 months of pupillometry., Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome measures included Spearman correlation coefficients between relative afferent pupillary defect as measured by pupillometry and inter-eye differences in average RNFL thickness, VFI, and MD., Results: Correlation coefficients between relative afferent pupillary defect and inter-eye difference in average RNFL thickness, MD, and VFI were -0.81 (P<0.001), -0.73 (P<0.001), and -0.68 (P<0.001), respectively., Conclusions: The automated pupillometer quantifies asymmetry in afferent pupillary responses in proportion to structural and functional asymmetry as measured SD-OCT and automated static perimetry.

The pupillometer, a cutting-edge biometric device, is a valuable assessment tool that can aid in the early detection and prompt treatment of neurological abnormalities. Pupil assessment is a critical component of the neurological examination, and manual pupil assessment leaves much room for error. Automated pupillometry improves the quality and reliability of pupillary and neurological assessments, ultimately improving patient outcomes., (Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of various methods of detecting a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) in patients with glaucoma-related diagnoses., Patients and Methods: Patients underwent RAPD evaluation using the swinging flashlight method (SFM), the magnifier-assisted SFM, and pupillography using the Konan RAPDx. Main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of three methods of RAPD evaluation in detecting visual field mean deviation (MD), cup to disc ratio (CDR), disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) asymmetry., Results: Eighty-one consecutive patients from the Wills Eye Hospital glaucoma service were enrolled, 60 with glaucoma and 21 with ocular hypertension or glaucoma suspect. Thirty-one percent of subjects had MD asymmetry>5 dB, 19.7% had CDR asymmetry≥0.20, 26.7% had DDLS asymmetry≥2, and 38.2% had RNFL asymmetry>10 microns. Sensitivity values for pupillography were 93.3% (95% CI, 68.1-99.8) for detecting MD asymmetry, 80.0% (95% CI, 51.9-95.7) for CDR asymmetry, 100.0% (95% CI, 73.5-100.0) for DDLS asymmetry, and 69.2% (95% CI, 38.6-90.9) for RNFL asymmetry. Specificity values were 41.2% (95% CI, 24.7-59.3) for detecting MD asymmetry, 32.8% (95% CI, 21.3-46.0) for CDR asymmetry, 33.3% (95% CI, 18.0-51.8) for DDLS asymmetry, and 42.9% (95% CI, 21.8-66.0) for RNFL asymmetry. Pupillography amplitude score was correlated with MD asymmetry (r2=0.41, P<0.001) and area under the curve was 0.84., Conclusion: Automated pupillography had higher sensitivity and lower specificity in detecting MD, CDR, DDLS, and RNFL asymmetry. Within the bounds of the cohort tested, this method had limited case-finding ability.

Background: The purpose of the study was to describe a simple infrared photography technique to aid in the diagnosis and documentation of pupillary abnormalities., Methods: An unmodified 12-megapixel "point and shoot" digital camera was used to obtain binocular still photos and videos under different light conditions with near-infrared illuminating frames. The near-infrared light of 850 nm allows the capture of clear pupil images in both dim and bright light conditions. It also allows easy visualization of the pupil despite pigmented irides by augmenting the contrast between the iris and the pupil., Results: The photos and videos obtained illustrated a variety of pupillary abnormalities using the aforementioned technique., Conclusions: This infrared-augmented photography technique supplements medical education, and aids in the more rapid detection, diagnosis, and documentation of a wide spectrum of pupillary abnormalities. Its portability and ease of use with minimal training complements the education of trainees and facilitates the establishment of difficult diagnoses.

Purpose: A test of validation study was conducted to investigate the use of a novel computerized portable pupillometer to detect and quantify relative afferent pupillary defects (RAPDs)., Materials and Methods: Binocular pupillary response curves were recorded in patients with RAPDs clinically graded by an examiner (n = 32) and in normal subjects (n = 31) with RAPDs simulated using quantifiable dimmed light intensities. In 14 normal subjects, testing was repeated within two months. Pupillary constriction amplitude (CA), velocity (CV) and onset latency (COL) were used to calculate RAPDs., Results: RAPDs in normal subjects were 0.16 ± 0.12 log units (LU) (range = 0-0.38). In retested normals, inter-visit variability was 0.21 ± 0.12 LU (range = 0-0.42). Significant correlation was found between RAPD values and dimmed light intensity in normal subjects (Pearson's r = 0.87, p < 0.0001) and between clinician and pupillometer grading of RAPDs in patients (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001). Using the upper limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of percentage change in CA (LU) as determined from normals, 21/23 (91%) patients with RAPDs ≥ 0.5 LU were distinguished from normals. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for distinguishing RAPDs ≥ 0.5 LU was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.95-1.00). RAPDs calculated using CA and CV correlated more strongly with the clinician's grading compared to COL (Steiger's test p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: This novel pupillometer correlated strongly with an expert examiner's clinical grading of RAPDs and detected clinically significant RAPDs with high sensitivity and specificity, suggesting it may have a prominent role as an objective clinical tool in the screening of patients with vision loss.

Abnormalities in the pupillary light reflex are an important prognostic indicator for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Manual pupillary examination is confounded by interobserver discrepancies and errors in detecting a reflex under certain conditions. The automated pupillometer is a computer-based infrared digital video device that can obtain objective measurements of pupillary size and reactivity. We performed an electronic literature search to identify original studies on the use of the automated pupillometer in the ICU. We identified 7 articles that met the inclusion criteria and reviewed them critically and assessed the quality of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We found that the study grade was low, and study quality was low to moderate for all the reviewed manuscripts. Pupillometric measurements had better precision and reproducibility compared with the manual pupillary examination. Based on these data, we conclude that pupillometry monitoring can serve as an important tool in the ICU. Further large scale studies on patients in the neurocritical care unit and medical ICU are needed to support the routine use of automated pupillometry., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) by swinging flashlight as a potentially useful screening test for glaucomatous optic neuropathy., Methods: One hundred seven subjects prospectively recruited from a mixed population of glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous patients were examined for a RAPD by 1 individual masked with regard to disease presence. All subjects underwent a swinging flashlight test with, when necessary, the aid of neutral density filters, to determine whether or not a RAPD was present. A determination of glaucoma diagnosis, as well as classification of disease stage, was subsequently assessed based upon review of history and ophthalmic examination. This clinical information regarding glaucomatous disease was ascertained without knowledge of study RAPD status. The acquisition of such clinical information and performance of swinging flashlight testing for RAPD was conducted by different individuals with the latter being a nonophthalmologist., Results: Statistical analysis demonstrated an odds ratio of 9.71 (95% CI, 3.72-25.40) for glaucomatous disease if a RAPD was present, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 82.9%. Subanalysis of patients who had not previously undergone cataract surgery revealed an odds ratio of 17.05 (95% CI, 4.73-61.44) for glaucomatous disease if a RAPD was present, with a sensitivity of 68.8% and a specificity of 88.6%., Conclusions: RAPD screening by a swinging flashlight test with neutral density filters was moderately sensitive and strongly specific for glaucoma. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value improved when patients who had previously undergone cataract surgery were removed from the analysis.

Background: Binocular infrared pupillometry allows an estimate of the relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), designated the pupillometric RAPD (pRAPD). We calibrated the pRAPD of a commercially available pupillometer against neutral density filters (NDFs) of known attenuation. The performance of the pupillometer using its own proprietary algorithm is assessed and compared to that of alternative algorithms., Methods: The pRAPDs of 50 healthy volunteers were measured with each of 4 filters of known attenuation: 0.0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 log units, positioned unilaterally in the light stimulus pathway. The filter values were plotted against the pupillometer output, and the slope and intercept were used to determine a calibration factor. Corrected pRAPD results were used to assess physiological ranges of pRAPD. The sensitivity and specificity to 0.3 log unit differences between increasing filter densities using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves., Results: The calibrated physiological pRAPD ranged from 0 to 0.22 log units. The area under the ROC curve for detecting unilateral simulated pRAPD of 0.3 log units, the simulated disease progression from 0.3 to 0.6 log units, and a further progression from 0.6 to 0.9 log units by NDFs was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.00), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87), respectively. The optimum discrimination was for detecting a unilateral simulated pRAPD of 0.3 log units; sensitivity and specificity was 98% (95% CI, 88%-99%)., Conclusion: The commercially available pupillometer detects the RAPD induced by the NDFs with high sensitivity and specificity. The results suggest that it is best for detecting unilateral early disease but potentially useful for assessing progression of disease.

Background and Objective: To investigate near infrared iris transillumination (NIRit) imaging as a new method to quantify pupil shape, size, and position because the imaging modality can uniquely provide simultaneous information regarding iris structural details that influence pupil characteristics and because exploration of related techniques could promote discovery helpful to clinical research and care., Patients and Methods: Digital NIRit images of normal and diseased eyes were used along with computer-assisted techniques to quantify four primary pupil parameters, including pupil roundness (PR), pupil ovalness (PO), pupil size (PS), and pupil eccentricity (PE). A combined measure of PR and PO was also developed (the pupil circularity index [PCI]). Repeatability of the measures was studied and example analyses were performed., Results: Pupil measures could be calculated for right eyes of 307 subjects (164 normal, 143 other), with fewer than 0.5% exclusions due to image quality. Repeatability study did not show significant bias (P < .05) for any of the four primary measures. Example analyses could show age-associated differences in pupil shape (≥ 50 year olds had less regular pupils than < 50 year olds: median PCI = 0.009 vs 0.006; P < .01) and that a group of pigment dispersion syndrome subjects (n = 27) had less regular pupils than a group of matched controls (PO = 0.9966 vs 0.9990; P < .05)., Conclusion: Digital NIRit imaging can provide novel, reliable, and informative methods to quantify pupil characteristics while providing simultaneous information about iris structure that may influence these parameters., (Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.)

The purpose of this study was the evaluation of pupil light reflex (PLR) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) by using a modern pupillometry system and the investigation of its potential relationship with dopamine transporter imaging (DaTSCAN), which is an objective method for the evaluation of presynaptic dopaminergic system. PLR was evaluated using pupillometry in 35 patients with PD without clinical evidence of autonomic dysfunction and 44 healthy matched controls. PLR was elicited using a fully automated pupillometry system and six parameters were measured. Dopamine transporter imaging was performed using radioactive ioflupane (123)I-FP-CIT [(123)I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)-nortropane]. A significant increase in latency and a significant decrease in amplitude, maximum constriction velocity, as well as maximum acceleration were observed in PD patients. There was no significant difference in initial radius and minimum radius values. Investigating the relationship between pupillometry parameters and (123)I-FP-CIT binding values, we correlated values from the semiquantitative analysis of radioligand uptake with pupillometry parameters, but we found no significant correlation. This study demonstrates PLR impairment in patients with PD without overt autonomic dysfunction. This impairment does not seem to correspond to the reduction of radioligand binding in the striatum as the result of presynaptic dopaminergic dysfunction, suggesting a different deterioration rate of these systems.

Purpose: To compare the standard method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) using the Standard Swinging Flashlight Method (S-SFM) with 2 novel techniques, to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of each method, and to validate the clinical significance of detecting more subtle RAPDs by correlating the extent of glaucoma damage with the presence or absence of an RAPD as assessed by each method., Patients and Methods: In this prospective, observational study 101 consecutive patients (68 diagnosed glaucoma patients, 20 glaucoma suspects including ocular hypertensives, and 13 controls) were screened for the presence or absence of an RAPD using the S-SFM, Magnifier-Assisted Swinging Flashlight Method (MA-SFM), and Ophthalmoscopic Swinging Flashlight Method . Humphrey visual field mean deviation (MD) of each eye and the intereye differences in MD and Disc damage likelihood score (DDLS) and intereye difference in DDLS were calculated. Sensitivities for each method (S-SFM, MA-SFM, and Ophthalmoscopic Swinging Flashlight Method) were calculated at increasing levels of change in DDLS and MD. Weighted κ scores were calculated for agreement between tests., Results: MA-SFM is the most sensitive method for determining an RAPD in terms of both intereye difference in DDLS and intereye differences in MD at all levels of change. Weighted κ scores revealed substantial agreement between tests for the same method, and moderate to substantial agreement among the observers., Conclusions: This study confirms results of our earlier study suggesting that swinging flashlight test modified with magnification (MA-SFM) can provide a simple, inexpensive, reproducible method of detecting an RAPD.

Background: Previous authors have suggested that an afferent pupillary defect (APD) may serve as an effective screening tool for some specific eye diseases, especially glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since the disease usually presents asymmetrically. Its success as a screening tool for glaucoma has never been previously prospectively evaluated in a large population., Methods: In this study, the authors carry out assessments for the presence of APD as it relates to the diagnosis of glaucoma in an existing population-based eye study in southern India. The authors calculate the sensitivity and specificity for APD, both at the level of a village/household screening and in a more comprehensive/hospital setting, as it pertains to its ability to predict glaucomatous optic neuropathy., Results and Discussion: The authors find that APD assessed via the swinging flashlight test is a poor screening tool for glaucoma in this setting.

Assessing pupil reactivity using the swinging flashlight technique in patients with miotic pupils or heavily pigmented irides can be difficult due to the reflection of the examination light off the cornea. We describe a modification of the standard method of detecting pupil reactivity in these difficult-to-see pupils. With the patient facing forward and eyes looking in maximal upgaze, fixed at distance, the examiner shines the light at the limbus in the straight ahead direction. Improved view of the pupil in upgaze results from reduction of the blink reflex and elimination of the Purkinje-1 image with minimal refractive distortion by the cornea. Optical calculations and multimedia demonstrations are provided to document these findings.

Purpose: To describe a case of an incidental finding of bilateral corectopia detected by photo screening which ultimately led to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis., Methods: Case presentation and literature review., Results: Corectopia may be congenital or acquired. Midbrain corectopia is commonly caused by infarction and demyelinating disease can cause autonomic pupil abnormalities resulting in corectopia., Conclusion: A careful history and ocular examinatin can aid in determining the etiology of corectopia. Additional genetics or neurologic consultation may be necessary to diagnosis systemic disease.

Pupil examination has been used as a basic measure in critically ill patients and has great importance for the prognosis and management of disease. An automated pupillometer is a computer-based infrared digital video system by which the accuracy and precision of the pupil examination are markedly improved. We conducted an observational study of pupil assessment with automated pupillometry in clinical liver transplantation settings, including pretransplant evaluations and posttransplant surveillance. Our results showed that unconscious patients (grade 4 hepatic encephalopathy) had a prolonged latency phase (left side: 283 +/- 80 milliseconds; right side: 295 +/- 96 milliseconds) and a reduced pupillary constrictive ratio (left direct response: 0.23 +/- 0.10; left indirect response: 0.21 +/- 0.07; right direct response: 0.20 +/- 0.08; right indirect response: 0.21 +/- 0.08) in comparison with normal and conscious patients. After liver transplantation, the recovery of pupillography in these patients was slower than that in conscious patients. However, the surviving recipients without major complications all had a gradual recovery of pupillary responses, which occurred on the first or second posttransplant day. We also reported 4 cases of futile LT in the absence of pretransplant pupillary responses and other pupillary abnormalities revealed by automated pupillometry in our study. In conclusion, patients with grade 4 hepatic encephalopathy had a sluggish pupil response and a delayed recovery pattern after LT. An automated pupillometer is potentially a supplementary device for pretransplant screening and posttransplant monitoring in patients undergoing LT, but further prospective studies are required.

Purpose: To investigate the ability of a portable pupillometer, capable of 20-second binocular recordings of the swinging flashlight test (SFT), to detect relative afferent pupillary defects (rAPDs)., Methods: Pupillary response curves were recorded from both eyes in healthy volunteers (n = 22) with and without simulated rAPDs (using neutral density filters (NDFs)) and in abnormal patients (n = 24) with clinically graded rAPDs. The light stimulus (0.2 sec on and 1 sec off, or 2 sec on and 0.4 sec off) alternated between both eyes, simulating the SFT. Constriction amplitude (CA), constriction velocity (CV), and pupillary release were calculated by computer algorithm. In abnormal patients, NDFs were used to neutralize inter-eye differences., Results: Significant correlation (Spearman's rho 0.71, 0.73) between NDF strength and absolute inter-eye differences was seen for CA and CV in simulated rAPDs. All abnormal patients (15/15) having rAPDs greater than 0.5 log units were distinguished from normals using either the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) value of CA or CV as determined from 22 healthy volunteers. Inter-eye variability in some normals prevented confident distinction of six abnormal patients with 0.3 log unit rAPDs. Using NDFs, subtle rAPDs were predicted in three patients having questionable rAPDs on clinical examination. CA and CV were more sensitive than pupillary release for all comparisons., Conclusions: This binocular pupillometer identified all of our patients with > 0.5 log unit rAPDs. Using NDFs, all of our abnormal patients were accurately identified and their rAPDs quantified. Variability in some normals makes them indistinguishable from patients with subtle rAPDs.

Purpose: To characterize the relationship between brightness sensitivity and color perception and relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) in patients with optic neuropathy., Methods: The "swinging flashlight test" was used to diagnose RAPD, the degree of which was quantified by neutral density filters, in 325 consecutive patients in a case-control study. A separate examiner, masked to the pupillary findings, then assessed participants for Ishihara color plate reading, brightness sense, and red perception. The latter two were quantified by asking the patient to score (out of 100%) brightness (of a light source) or redness (of an object) of the two eyes relative to each other. Pearson correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated., Results: Brightness sense (r = -0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.84 to -0.73; P < 0.0001), red perception (r = -0.73; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.65; P < 0.0001), and Ishihara color plate reading (r = -0.68; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.66; P < 0.0001) were each strongly and highly significantly correlated with the diagnosis and degree of RAPD. Brightness sense and red perception were each able to discriminate almost all the area under ROC for the diagnosis of RAPD (area of 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00; P < 0.0001; area of 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96; P < 0.0001, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of brightness sense in detection of RAPD were 99% (95% CI, 0.97-1.00) and 95% (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), respectively. The red perception test was only slightly less accurate., Conclusions: Rapid, simple assessments of brightness sense and color perception provide accurate methods to facilitate the diagnosis of optic neuropathy and may prove to be valuable in screening for optic neuropathy or alternatives to the swinging flashlight test.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and the reproducibility of scotopic pupil measurements using 2 different methods., Methods: Scotopic pupil diameter was measured in 56 eyes of 28 volunteers and the results were compared between the green light test at the slit lamp (Haag-Streit, Switzerland) and the automatic measurements of the wave-front analyser WASCA (Carl-Zeiss-Meditec) by 2 independent examiners. Non-parametric sign test as well as All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures (Student-Newman-Keuls method) were performed for the comparison of means for each individual eye as well as the results of both eyes tested by both examiners., Results: Mean age of the subjects was 34.9 years. The colour of iris was green or blue in 22 cases and brown in 6 cases. REPRODUCIBILITY: For the green light test we found for the first investigator in the right eye a mean pupil diameter of 6.58 mm (SD 0.68). The measurement of the second investigator for the same eye was 6.64 mm (SD 0.61). The left eye values were as follows: 6.36 mm (SD 0.68) and 6.75 mm (SD 0.68). For WASCA we found for the first investigator in the right eye 6.33 mm (SD 0.64) vs. 6.30 mm (SD 0.64) for the second investigator, in the left eye 6.39 mm (SD 0.69) vs. 6.36 mm (SD 0.60). There was a statistically significant difference between the two investigators when the green light test was used (6.47 mm vs. 6.69 mm for both eyes). No difference was found using the WASCA integrated pupillometer (6.35 mm vs. 6.33 mm). There was a significant difference between the means of combined data for both measurement methods: 6.58 mm for the green light test (SD 0.57) vs. 6.34 mm for WASCA (SD 0.62)., Conclusions: The integrated pupillometry of the WASCA analyser showed better reproducibility of measurements than the green light test. The green light test measures a slightly larger diameter (in the mean by 0.25 mm) than WASCA. Because of the fair and clinically sufficient reproducibility as well as virtually non-existing additional costs the green light test can be strongly recommended to referring ophthalmologists and low-volume refractive surgeons.

Purpose: To evaluate the validity of different methods of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) detection and assess the usefulness of detecting an RAPD in glaucoma patients., Methods: For this prospective observational study, we enrolled 70 of 153 consecutive glaucoma patients coming for examination. Exclusion criteria were cloudy corneas, recent surgery, fixed pupils, and other diseases producing RAPDs. Inclusion criteria were any type of glaucoma and absence of any exclusion criterion. Patients were examined for an RAPD by the swinging flashlight method (SFM), a magnifier-assisted swinging flashlight method (MAM), and automated pupillography. The SFM and MAM results were compared with those obtained by pupillography. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were determined. Correlations of other optic disc and visual field indices of glaucoma damage with RAPD were determined., Results: We confirmed RAPDs in 39 (56%) of the subjects by pupillography, finding a sensitivity of 41% and 84% and a specificity of 90% and 76% for SFM and MAM, respectively. The AUC was 0.86 for MAM and 0.61 for SFM. The correlations (r) between RAPD with intereye differences in the optic disc and visual field indices of glaucoma damage were moderate., Conclusions: A modified swinging flashlight test with magnification increases the sensitivity of the test in detecting an RAPD. Because the detection of an RAPD may precede apparent optic disc and visual field damage, looking for an RAPD may be an important part of the assessment of patients with glaucoma.

Although diabetic autonomic neuropathy involves most organs, diagnosis is largely based on cardiovascular tests. Light reflex pupillography (LRP) non-invasively evaluates pupillary autonomic function. We tested whether LRP demonstrates autonomic pupillary dysfunction in diabetics independently from cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) or peripheral neuropathy (PN). In 36 type-II diabetics (39-84 years) and 36 controls (35-78 years), we performed LRP. We determined diameter (PD), early and late re-dilation velocities (DV) as sympathetic parameters and reflex amplitude (RA) and constriction velocity (CV) as parasympathetic pupillary indices. We assessed the frequency of CAN using heart rate variability tests and evaluated the frequency of PN using neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, thermal and vibratory threshold determination. Twenty-eight (77.8%) patients had abnormal pupillography results, but only 20 patients (56%) had signs of PN or CAN. In nine patients with PN, only pupillography identified autonomic neuropathy. Four patients had pupillary dysfunction but no CAN or PN. In comparison to controls, patients had reduced PD, late DV, RA and CV indicating sympathetic and parasympathetic dysfunction. The incidence and severity of pupillary abnormalities did not differ between patients with and without CAN or PN. LRP demonstrates sympathetic and parasympathetic pupillary dysfunction independently from PN or CAN and thus refines the diagnosis of autonomic neuropathy in type-II diabetics.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy and the reproducibility of scotopic pupil measurements using two different methods., Patients and Methods: We developed a simple test to measure scotopic pupil diameters using a narrow slit of light through a green filter of the Haag-Streit slitlamp. A total of 100 eyes from 50 refractive surgery candidates were prospectively examined by 2 independent investigators using both the Colvard pupilometer (Oasis/USA) and Sekundo's slitlamp green light test. Results were compared using all pairwise multiple comparison procedures (Student-Newman-Keuls method, SigmaStat/Jandel Scientific). The mean age of the patients was 36.3 years with a male:female ratio of 16:34. The colour of the iris was considered blue for 36 individuals and brown for the remainder., Results: Reproducibility: the right eye mean pupil diameter using Sekundo's method was 6.4 mm (+/-0.9) measured by both the first (Slit 1R) and the second (Slit 2R) investigator. The left eye mean pupil diameter was 6.5 mm (+/-1) (Slit 1L) and 6.35 mm (+/-1) (Slit 2L), respectively. The following measurements were obtained with the Colvard pupillometer: (Colv1R)=6.25+/-0.85 mm, (Colv2R)=5.99+/-1 mm, (Colv1L)=6.15+/-0.91 mm, (Colv2L)=6.05+/-0.9 mm. There were no statistically significant differences between the two investigators within the same method of examination. Comparability:The data of both investigators were combined to form 4 groups: (Slit R)=6.4+/-0.96 mm, (Slit L)=6.4+/-1 mm, (Colv R)=6.05+/-0.9 mm, (Colv L)=6.1+/-0.93 mm. There was a significant difference ( p=0.024) between the two methods for both right and left eyes. Particularly for large pupils, the slitlamp green light measurements were significantly higher (up to 0.35 mm) than those with Colvard's device., Conclusions: The slitlamp green light test provides similar reproducibility for the measurement of the scotopic pupil diameter as the commercially available Colvard pupilometer.

Examination of the pupil provides critical objective information that complements subjective visual measurements and can provide important clues for distinguishing among different etiologies of loss of visual function. Although automated technologies and pupillary perimetry provide valuable insight into the correspondence between visual and pupillary dysfunction, a firm understanding of the principles of the afferent examination of the pupil is all that is required for the clinician to quickly obtain this objective measure of function during any routine examination.

The development of personal computer-based infrared video instruments has allowed pupillography to enter the clinical arena. Measuring pupil diameter for refractive surgery, distinguishing Horner syndrome from physiologic anisocoria, quantifying the relative afferent pupillary defect, and plotting visual fields by means of graded pupil constriction to focal light stimuli are recent applications in ophthalmology. Pupillography has also been used to determine sleepiness and autonomic effects of new pharmaceuticals.

The history of the visual examination is discussed in five parts. The history of visual acuity is followed from the minimum separable of Persian scientists to the 19th-century charts. Events in the history of the examination of the pupil include the late discovery of the significance of anisocoria in trauma, the description of the pupillary light reflex, the midbrain nucleus responsible for it, and the discovery of the neuroanatomic basis of pupillary abnormalities. Attempts to look into the eyeball date from the 17th century and are followed up to the discovery of the ophthalmoscope (1851). The evolution of the visual field examination is described from the first observations of hemianopia in the Hippocratic Corpus, to the present day visual field examination. Important landmarks in the history of central disorders of visual integration include "mind blindness" and the theories on aphasia that formed the basis for the study of disorders of central integration.

Purpose: To describe a simple technique that detects a subtle relative afferent pupillary defect., Design: Observational report., Methods: With the patient seated at a slit lamp and the slit illumination turned off, a transilluminator light is swung back and forth between the eyes. The examiner observes the direct pupil light response and the consensual light response under slit-lamp magnification., Conclusion: Using slit-lamp magnification, the examiner may observe small amplitudes of pupillary movement in the evaluation of a relative afferent pupillary defect.

Objective: To investigate the ability of a portable, personal computer-driven, pupillometer to record the pupillary response curve during the swinging flashlight test. Also, to determine whether these response curves can be used to identify and quantify relative asymmetry in the pupillary light reflex between eyes in healthy volunteers with simulated afferent pupil defects (APDs) and patients with optic neuropathies., Design: Comparative, observational case series and instrument validation., Participants: Healthy volunteers with no known ocular disease and patients (n = 20) with various optic neuropathies noted to have relative APDs on examination., Methods: Pupillary response curves of the right eye were recorded with a portable, electronic, infrared pupillometer from healthy volunteers (with and without simulated APDs) and patients with APDs while the light stimulus alternated between eyes, simulating the swinging flashlight test. Simulated APDs in healthy volunteers were created with increasingly dense neutral density filters in front of the left eye., Main Outcome Measures: Differences in constriction amplitude, latency, and constriction velocity of the pupillary response with right eye stimulation versus left eye stimulation in both groups of subjects., Results: A significant correlation between neutral density filter strength and intereye differences was seen for all measurement parameters in volunteers with simulated APDs. Depending on the measurement parameter and stimulus intensity, simulated APDs of 0.6 log units or more could be distinguished from normal responses. Clinically graded true APDs had intereye differences similar to simulated APDs of the same density. Those with real and simulated APDs of 0.9 log units or more could be distinguished from healthy volunteers with 80% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Responses from those with real and simulated small APDs of 0.3 to 0.6 log units could not be distinguished reliably., Conclusions: Portable, personal-computer driven, electronic, infrared pupillography can record the swinging flashlight test accurately and identify large afferent pupillary defects. An affordable, portable, reliable device for identifying relative APDs would be useful in the identification and follow-up of patients with neurogenic vision loss.

Objective: The authors compared two methods, the Marcus Gunn test and the alternating light test, for detecting a relative afferent pupillary defect., Design: A randomized, prospective clinical trial., Participants: Fourteen patients with unilateral optic neuropathy., Intervention: The Marcus Gunn and alternating light tests were performed on each patient., Main Outcome Measures: The results of the Marcus Gunn and altemating light tests for detecting a relative afferent pupillary defect on the affected side., Results: The Marcus Gunn test was able to identify the affected eye in only 8 of 14 patients, whereas the alternating light test correctly identified the affected eye in 13 of 14 patients. Results of the Marcus Gunn test were indeterminate in 4 of 14 patients and were incorrect in 2 of 14 patients. Results of the alternating light test were indeterminate in one patient and never incorrectly identified the affected eye., Conclusion: The alternating light test is superior to the Marcus Gunn test for detecting relative afferent pupillary defects.