Search

Objective.: To determine the acceptability of purified fish protein (FPi) in cereal and pseudocereal-based drinks., Materials and Methods.: The study was carried out at Centro de Desarrollo Integral Familiar "Año Nuevo" belonging to the INABIF Program in the district of Comas in Lima. FPi (0-4 g per serving) was administered daily for 3 months mixed with cereal and pseudocereal-based drinks. The acceptability of FPi was measured by direct weighing in children under 6 years of age and by the hedonic facial scale in school-age children., Results.: One hundred and fifty-eight (158) participants were enrolled and 4,211 breakfasts were served. The caloric intake of the cereal and pseudocereal drinks, after adding the FPi, ranged between 117 and 140 Kcal, and protein intake ranged between 3.4 g and 5.4 g per serving. The acceptability of drinks supplemented with FPi in children older than 6 years of age (the 2 highest scores together) ranged from 55% to 74% for oats, around 47% for quinoa and 40% to 58% for "kiwicha" (amaranth). Whereas 90% of children under 6 consumed more than 70% of the drinks offered., Conclusions.: We found a good acceptability of FPi in cereal and pseudocereal beverages in children under 6 years of age. FPi is an alternative to improve the consumption of animal protein in the nutrition of children, especially in pre-schoolers.

Objective: To determine the effect of a fish protein isolate (FPi), administered over 6 months, on the growth of children aged 6-36 months, measured by Z-scores of height-for-age (HAZ) and weight-for-height (WHZ), compared with the standard meal without FPi; and to determine the safety and acceptability of FPi daily consumption., Design: Cluster-randomized community-based controlled trial. For 6 months, the centres received either FPi replacing 50 % of total proteins in the diet or standard protein. HAZ and WHZ were used to determine the effect on growth. Acceptability was determined by daily consumption, measured by weighing the servings before and after consumption., Setting: Day care centres and community nutritional centres in northern Lima, Peru., Subjects: Children (n 441) aged 6-36 months., Results: Four centres were randomized to the intervention with FPi, five centres were randomized to the standard control diet. More than 36 900 meals were prepared and administered in a supervised manner. Both groups received the same amounts of energy and proteins daily (proteins about 12-15 % of total energy). Growth of children who received the FPi diet was similar to that of children with the standard diet. Consumption was similar in the FPi and control groups (70 v. 80 % of amount offered, respectively). The protein was safe and well tolerated. No adverse events were reported. However, the cost of the intervention with FPi was 20-40 % lower v. the standard diet with animal protein derived from beef, chicken, eggs or liver., Conclusions: The FPi was well accepted and there was no significant difference in growth between both groups. FPi is a potential source of animal protein at lower cost.