Search

Objective: To analyze the influence of an oral bisphosphonate and compare the potency to intravenous bisphosphonates on various cell types as regards the rarity of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (BP-ONJ) caused by oral bisphosphonate., Materials and Methods: A viability assay (MTT), a migration assay (Boyden chamber), and an apoptosis assay (Caspase-Glo® 3/7) were performed to analyze the effect of bisphosphonates on human fibroblasts, umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), and osteoblasts., Results: Alendronate and intravenous bisphosphonates suppressed cell viability and migration, and induced apoptosis in all tested cell types. Alendronate had a greater impact than ibandronate on the characteristics in fibroblasts and osteoblasts but not as strong as zoledronate., Conclusions: The incidence of BP-ONJ in oral bisphosphonate treatment is reported to be much lower than that in intravenous bisphosphonates. However, the influences of alendronate on human cells were at least as strong as ibandronate, although it was lower than zoledronate., Clinical Relevance: Alendronate showed strong enough effects to suppress human somatic cells and was comparable to certain intravenous bisphosphonates in potency. This study suggests that the lower incidence of BP-ONJ in alendronate treatment is not originated by its potency, but might be due to the low bioavailability of alendronate, lower dosing on a daily basis, and having no additional therapies.

Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (BP-ONJ) is one of the most often seen side effects in patients treated with bisphosphonates, presenting clinically as a non-healing wound. One theory of BP-ONJ etiology describes a negative effect on soft tissues, especially on keratinocytes, which play an important role in oral wound healing and oral soft tissue regeneration. A high cell viability of keratinocytes, which can migrate to the affected location, is essential for wound healing. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of differently potent bisphosphonates on human oral keratinocytes (HOK).Three nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (ibandronate, pamidronate, and zoledronate) and one non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (clodronate) were compared concerning their potency on cell viability (calcein assay and MTT assay), migration ability (Boyden chamber migration assay and scratch wound proliferation assay), and apoptosis (TUNEL assay) of HOK.The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, particularly highly potent pamidronate and zoledronate preparations, had a strong negative influence on cell viability, migration ability, and apoptosis of HOK. The non-nitrogen-containing clodronate even increased cell viability in higher concentrations.This study demonstrates that bisphosphonates have a strong influence on HOK on different cellular levels like cell viability, migration ability, and apoptosis rate. The results support the theory that BP-ONJ is a multifactorially caused disease.Furthermore, this in vitro study confirms the theory that perioperative interruption of bisphosphonate application during dental surgical procedures might be feasible to promote better tissue regeneration and wound healing.

Bisphosphonates are widely used in the clinical treatment of bone diseases with increased bone resorption. In terms of side effects, they are widely known to be associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (BONJ). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonates on the gene expression of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) in vitro. Nitrogen-containing and non-nitrogen containing bisphosphonates have been compared. Human osteoblasts were stimulated with zoledronate and ibandronate at concentrations of 5 × 10(-5) M, 5 × 10(-6) M, and 5 × 10(-7) M over the experimental period of 14 days. Furthermore, the hOB cell lines were stimulated by clodronate at concentrations of 5 × 10(-3) M, 5 × 10(-5) M, and 5 × 10(-6) M. At each point in time, the gene expression levels of RANKL and OPG were quantified by real-time RT-PCR. The results showed a moderate enhancement of OPG gene expression whereas RANKL gene expression was strongly increased by nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates reaching a maximum after 14 days at high concentrations of 5 × 10(-5) M. Lower concentrations did not enhance the RANKL and OPG expression considerably. The non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate clodronate, however, effected OPG and RANKL gene expression much less, even at higher concentrations of 5 × 10(-3) M. The above-mentioned data suggest an enhanced RANKL/OPG gene expression after stimulation by bisphosphonates. Interestingly, clodronate might have little influence on osteoblast/osteoclast interaction with respect to OPG and RANKL gene expression.

Bisphosphonates are widely used in the clinical treatment of bone diseases with increased bone resorption. In terms of side effects, they are known to be associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (BONJ). There are two groups of bisphosphonates: the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, e.g. zoledronate and ibandronate, and the non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, e.g. clodronate. Their impact on bone metabolism seems to differ. The objective of this study was to compare the osteogenic differentiation potency of these two pharmacologic groups. Human osteoblasts were stimulated with zoledronate and ibandronate at concentrations of 5×10(-5) M, 5×10(-6) M and 5×10(-7) M over the experimental periods of 1, 2, 5, 10 and 14 days. Clodronate was applied with concentrations of 5×10(-3), 5×10(-5) M and 5×10(-6) M. At each time point, the cells were dissolved, the mRNA extracted, and the gene expression level of the osteoblast specific differentiation markers of the homeobox transcription factors MSX1 and MSX2, the distal-less homeobox 5 (Dlx5), the Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2/CBF1a) and osteocalcin (OCN) were quantified by Real-Time PCR. The gene expression was compared to an unstimulated osteoblast cell culture as control. The results showed a significant difference between the nitrogen-containing and the non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Zoledronate and ibandronate at concentrations of 5×10(-5) M enhanced the gene expression of all differentiation markers by several hundred folds compared to unstimulated control after 10 days, whereas clodronate had less influence on gene expression, even at higher concentrations of 5×10(-3) M. Lower concentrations of zoledronate and ibandronate, however, led to a decreased gene expression. These data confirm the results of other studies which have shown the osteogenic stimulus on osteoblasts in a dose dependent manner. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates appear to enhance bone density by stimulation of osteoblast differentiation. Non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates seem to have less influence on osteoblast differentiation., (Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (BP-ONJ) is one of the main side effects in patients treated with bisphosphonates for metastasis to the bone or osteoporosis. BP-ONJ usually occurs in patients treated with highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. The exact mechanism of action and etiopathology is still unknown. In addition to inhibition of bone remodelling, an anti-angiogenetic effect has become the focus of research. The aim of these study was to investigate the effect of different bisphosphonates on human umbilicord vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), which play an important role in angiogenesis. Using varying concentrations, the impact of one non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (clodronate) and three nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (ibandronate, pamidronate and zoledronate) on HUVEC and EPC was analysed. The biologic behaviour of HUVEC after incubation with different bisphosphonates was measured in a Boyden migration assay as well as in a 3D angiogenesis assay. The number of apoptotic cells was measured by Tunnel assay. To underline the importance of neoangiogenesis in the context of BP-ONJ, we measured the EPC number after incubation with different bisphosphonates in vitro. HUVEC and EPC were significantly influenced by bisphosphonates at different concentrations compared with the non-treated control groups. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates pamidronate and zoledronate had the greatest impact on the cells, whereas clodronate followed by ibandronate was less distinct on cell function. These results underline the hypothesis that inhibited angiogenesis induced by bisphosphonates might be of relevance in the development and maintenance of BP-ONJ. The increased impact by highly potent bisphosphonates on HUVEC and EPC may explain the high prevalence of BP-ONJ in patients undergoing this treatment.

Background: Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (BP-ONJ) is an adverse effect of bisphosphonate treatment with varying reported incidence rates., Methods: In two neighboring German cities, prevalence and additional factors of the development of BP-ONJ in multiple myeloma patients with bisphosphonates therapy were recorded using a retrospective (RS) and cross-sectional study (CSS) design. For the RS, all patients treated from Jan. 2000--Feb. 2006 were contacted by letter. In the CSS, all patients treated from Oct. 2006--Mar. 2008 had a physical and dental examination. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to evaluate all articles reporting on BP-ONJ prevalence. PubMed search terms were: bisphosphonat, diphosphonate, osteonecrosis, prevalence and incidence., Results: In the RS, data from 81 of 161 patients could be obtained; four patients (4.9%) developed BP-ONJ. In the CSS, 16 of 78 patients (20.5%) developed BP-ONJ. All patients with BP-ONJ had received zoledronate; 12 of these had had additional bisphosphonates. All except one had an additional trigger factor (tooth extraction [n = 14], dental surgical procedure [n = 2], sharp mylohyoid ridge [n = 3])., Conclusion: The prevalence of BP-ONJ may have been underestimated to date. The oral examination of all patients in this CSS might explain the higher prevalence, since even early asymptomatic stages of BP-ONJ and previously unnoticed symptomatic BP-ONJ were recorded. Since nearly all patients with BP-ONJ had an additional trigger factor, oral hygiene and dental care might help to reduce BP-ONJ incidence.

Background: Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (BP-ONJ) is a relatively new disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of BP-ONJ in breast cancer patients with osseous metastasis and bisphosphonate therapy., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a EUSOMA accredited breast unit in Germany. All patients treated from January of 2000 to March of 2006 with metastatic breast cancer and bisphosphonate therapy were reviewed. All patients were contacted, and missing data were completed through structured interviews with their dentists and physicians (n = 75). Primary outcome was the development of BP-ONJ and the detection of possible additional trigger factors for the development of BP-ONJ., Results: A total of 117 patients with breast cancer fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and data for 75 still living patients were included. Of these 75, 4 patients developed a BP-ONJ, resulting in a prevalence of 5.3%: 3 patients received zoledronate only; 1 patient had first pamidronate followed by zoledronate and ibandronate. A tooth extraction could be identified as an additional trigger factor for 2 patients., Conclusions: With a prevalence of 5.3%, BP-ONJ in breast cancer patients has become a relevant disease that should be discussed with patients for whom bisphosphonates have been recommended. Appropriate dental care before bisphosphonate therapy commences has been advised to reduce the occurrence of BP-ONJ.

Background: In addition to other treatments, patients with prostate cancer (pCA) and bone metastasis receive bisphosphonates. Since 2003, a previously unknown side-effect of bisphosphonates-bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (BP-ONJ)-has been described, and frequency has since increased. An exact incidence is still unknown., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and additional factors in the development of BP-ONJ., Design, Setting, and Participants: From July 2006 to October 2007, patients with advanced pCA and osseous metastasis receiving bisphosphonate therapy in the Department of Urology or Haematology and Oncology at the Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany, received a dental examination. In all, 43 patients were included., Measurements: Patients were checked for exposed bone, osteonecrosis, mucosal defects, inflammation, and oral hygiene. Further points were the applied bisphosphonate, co-medication, the duration of application, and possible trigger factors for BP-ONJ., Results and Limitations: Eight of 43 patients developed BP-ONJ (18.6%). All patients had received zoledronate at least 14 times. Two patients had received bondronate, and one patient had received pamidronate before switching to zoledronate. All patients had had a previous tooth extraction or a denture pressure sore, and all patients had received additional chemotherapy and corticosteroids., Conclusions: The reason for this relatively high incidence compared to other studies might be the prospective study design and thorough dental examination. In studies with such small numbers as have been published to date, nondetection or nonreported cases of BP-ONJ have an influence on the outcome. The incidence of BP-ONJ in patients with pCA might be an underestimated problem.

Reports of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients receiving long-term bisphosphonate therapy have appeared in the literature since 2003. This condition involves avascular necrotic bone in the area of maxilla or mandibula and there may be a secondary infection. Most cases of ONJ have been reported in cancer patients receiving the intravenous aminobisphosphonates zoledronic acid and pamidronate monthly or q 3 week; of note these are also the two most commonly used agents of this class. Risk factors for ONJ include a history of trauma, dental surgery or dental infection and intravenous bisphosphonate administration; in addition, the extent and duration of exposure to bisphosphonates also seem to correlate with the risk. Although a direct causal relationship with bisphosphonates cannot be assumed, these agents may possibly contribute to the development of ONJ by suppression of bone remodeling in the jaw which leads to increased rates of bone mineralisation and accumulation of microfractures. Clodronate, a non-aminobisphosphonate, appears to have a different mechanism of suppressing bone remodeling compared with aminobisphosphonates, and this may explain why few cases of ONJ have been reported with clodronate despite extensive use over the past 20 years; however, the potential of clodronate to reduce the risk of ONJ while providing equivalent clinical benefit to the aminobisphosphonates needs to be substantiated in controlled clinical trials. Use of bisphosphonate therapy should be carefully planned in patients with metastatic bone disease who have risk factors for ONJ, and appropriate preventive measures taken to avoid the development of this condition.

Objectives: Prevalence of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws within the catchment area of a university hospital maxillofacial unit and to review the outcome of treatment., Methods: In a retrospective study, all patients with osteonecrosis, osteomyelitis and osteoradionecrosis treated in the period from January 2000 to March 2005 in the department for Maxillo Facial Surgery at the University of Mainz, Germany were analysed., Results: Forty percent of the patients are grouped to odontogenic or surgically induced osteomyelitis. The second largest group (28%) were patients with osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Ten percent of all patients developed an osteonecrosis after treatment with bisphosphonates (BOJ). Eight percent showed osteomyelitis or sequester due to a trauma while 14% of all patients had osteomyelitis of unknown origin. All BOJ patients took bisphosphonates because of metastatic diseases of the bone (plasmocytoma, mamma carcinoma and prostate cancer) for up to 5 years. All had been administered a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (either pamidronat or zoledronat). Thirteen out of the 17 patients with BOJ and 14 of the 45 with ORN reported a possible trigger like previous tooth extraction, pressure denture sore or periodontal diseases., Conclusion: These findings support the association of bisphosphonate therapy and osteonecrosis of the jaw. The importance of this new disease is characterised by the growing number of patients. The role of dental trigger factors and the poor surgical outcome both seem to justify a prophylactic dental care concept in high-risk patients.

For several decades bisphosphonates have been used to reduce skeletal related events in patients with both osteoporosis or bone metastases. Under long term application, besides the known therapy side effects, a new clinical picture has been described within the last few years. This is osteonecrosis of the jaws, which is characterized by its difficulty in treatment. Besides exposed jaw bone, the start of the disease usually lacks any symptoms. The typical clinical symptoms then are foetor ex ore, swelling, exsudation, loosening of teeth, pain or paresthesia. Later oro-antral/nasal or oro-cutaneous fistula can develop. The X-ray shows persisting tooth sockets after extractions and later cloudy radio-lucency, sequestra or fractures. The patient exposed to bisphosphonate can be grouped according to the risk for osteonecrosis: high risk patients with intravenous bisphosphonate therapy and additional chemo-, radiation or corticoid therapy--predominantly patients with a malignant underlying disease and bone metastases low risk patients with an oral bisphosphonate therapy without additional chemo-, radiation or corticoid therapy--preferably patients with non-corticoid-induced osteoporosis. Before starting a bisphosphonate therapy possible causes of infection should be treated and risk of injuries to the mucosa should be reduced according to the individual risk profile. This is supplemented by information of the patient about the risk of necrosis and the possibilities for prevention. Regular dental recall under bisphophonate therapy is emphasised for early recognition of possible problems. Prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of periodontal infection combined with a follow up of removable denture for possible ulcera. Generally, conservative treatment measures are preferred to surgical ones. Inevitable operations are carried out non-traumatically using broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis until the day of suture removal (not before day 10). Long term follow up examinations are recommended.Patients with dental implants inserted before a bisphophonate therapy should be subject to intensive recall examinations. For patients undergoing or following a bisphosphonate therapy the indication for dental implants should be as strict as for patients following head and neck radiation therapy. In the present for patients with osteonecrosis, even after healing, dental implants are regarded as contra-indication. Therapy of the necrosis often requires general anaesthesia, hospitalisation, naso-gastral feeding tube and intravenous, systemic antiinfective treatment. The necrosis is removed completely and a tension free wound closure with vascularised tissue is intended. A literature review shows the metabolic effect of biphosphonates, the known pathogenesis of the bisphosphonate-induced jaw necrosis. It is essential to develop interdisciplinary communication, aiming at a joint care for this group of concerned patients and involving not only those medical disciplines, which order and use bisphosphonates, but especially dentists and maxillofacial surgeons.

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates lead to the depletion of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate involved in the mevalonate pathway. The effect of geranylgeraniol (GGOH) on human osteoblast and osteoclast activities suppressed by zoledronate was investigated in this study. The effect of GGOH on human osteoblasts and osteoclasts subjected to treatment with zoledronate was analyzed by assessing cell viability, osteoclast differentiation, resorption ability, gene expression, and protein synthesis. Cell viability suppressed by bisphosphonates in osteoblasts and osteoprogenitor cells was restored with GGOH. Osteoclast differentiation was analyzed by vitronectin receptor immunofluorescence staining, and the addition of GGOH to zoledronate significantly increased osteoclast differentiation compared with zoledronate alone. A trend of reversal of osteoclast resorption by GGOH was observed; however, it was not significant in all groups. The expression of ALP, type 1 collagen, and RUNX2 in osteoblasts was recovered by the addition of GGOH. Only CALCR expression in osteoclasts was significantly recovered by GGOH addition in the zoledronate group. Although the activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts were not entirely restored, the possibility that the topical application of GGOH in MRONJ patients or patients with dental problems and bisphosphonates might lessen the risk of development and recurrence of MRONJ is shown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (BP-ONJ) is triggered by inflammatory processes. Typical trigger factors are periodontal disease, denture pressure sores, and surgical interventions such as tooth extractions. Unfortunately there is only little data on how to proceed with implant therapy in patients with bisphosphonate treatment. This topic is not addressed in the German guidelines on medication-associated osteonecrosis. Therefore a systematic literature review was performed. Methods: The PICO design was used: (Patients) For which subclientel of patients with antiresorptive therapy (intervention) do dental implants have a benefit (control) compared to forgoing dental implants (outcome) in regards to oral rehabilitation and quality of life without having a substantial risk of BP-ONJ development? A PubMed search was performed including all studies dealing with this topic. Case reports and studies with less than 5 cases were excluded. Results: There is only very little data available, mostly retrospective case series. 50 articles were analyzed in detail. BP-ONJ can be triggered by dental implants and by dentures in patients with benign and malignant primary diseases. In most studies, analyzing osteoporosis patients only, no cases of BP-ONJ were observed in patients with implant therapy in the time span observed. There are no studies about implant therapy in patients with malignant diseases. Many case series analyzing the trigger factors for BP-ONJ describe dentures as one of the main causes. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis has a benefit in the prevention of BP-ONJ development. Conclusion: Successful implant therapy is possible in patients receiving antiresorptive therapy. The possibility of osteonecrosis development needs to be explained to the patient. An individual risk assessment is essential, taking the primary disease with the medication and further wound-healing-compromising diseases and medications into account. If possible, bone augmentations should be avoided, and a perioperative antimicrobiological prophylaxis is strongly recommended in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (BP-ONJ) is an adverse effect of bisphosphonate treatment with varying reported incidence rates. Methods: In two neighboring German cities, prevalence and additional factors of the development of BP-ONJ in multiple myeloma patients with bisphosphonates therapy were recorded using a retrospective (RS) and cross-sectional study (CSS) design. For the RS, all patients treated from Jan. 2000 - Feb. 2006 were contacted by letter. In the CSS, all patients treated from Oct. 2006 - Mar. 2008 had a physical and dental examination. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to evaluate all articles reporting on BP-ONJ prevalence. PubMed search terms were: bisphosphonat, diphosphonate, osteonecrosis, prevalence and incidence. Results: In the RS, data from 81 of 161 patients could be obtained; four patients (4.9%) developed BP-ONJ. In the CSS, 16 of 78 patients (20.5%) developed BP-ONJ. All patients with BP-ONJ had received zoledronate; 12 of these had had additional bisphosphonates. All except one had an additional trigger factor (tooth extraction [n = 14], dental surgical procedure [n = 2], sharp mylohyoid ridge [n = 3]). Conclusion: The prevalence of BP-ONJ may have been underestimated to date. The oral examination of all patients in this CSS might explain the higher prevalence, since even early asymptomatic stages of BP-ONJ and previously unnoticed symptomatic BP-ONJ were recorded. Since nearly all patients with BP-ONJ had an additional trigger factor, oral hygiene and dental care might help to reduce BP-ONJ incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of Bisphosphonate-associated-osteonecrosis- of-the-jaws (BP-ONJ) and protective factors of BP-ONJ-development in breast cancer patients with osseous metastasis and bisphosphonate therapy using systematical dental oral examinations. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional-study was conducted in the Department for Gynecology in Mainz, Germany. All breast cancer patients (n=51) treated with bisphosphonate in the time span from 07/2006 to 09/2007 were recruited. Primary outcome was the development of BP-ONJ and the detection of possible additional trigger factors for the development of BP-ONJ, as well as possible factors for avoiding BP-ONJ. Results: Only 1 out of 51 patients developed BP-ONJ (2.0%). A tooth extraction could be identified as an additional trigger factor. The overall dental hygiene of this patient clientele was above average. Conclusion: Compared to other malignant diseases, BP-ONJ in breast cancer patients does not appear as often. The underlying disease might be of importance in the development of BP-ONJ. A good dental hygiene might be a protective factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antiresorptive agents, e.g. bisphosphonates or denosumab reduce bone remodeling activity and may be responsible for necrosis also in patients with osteoporosis. In implantology in particular, the relationship between implant survival and bisphosphonate intake has been investigated almost exclusively in recent years. A specific question in the context of the anamnesis and targeted risk evaluation is urgently needed here. In this context, the DGI checklist gives a practical advice.