Search

Objectives: Early preparation for the training and education of healthcare providers, as well as the continuation or modification of routine medical education programs, is of great importance in times of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic or other public health emergencies. The goal of this study was to characterize these self-reported efforts by the pediatric simulation community., Design: This was a global, multicenter survey developed via a Delphi process., Setting: International survey study., Subjects: The survey was sent to 555 individual members of the three largest international pediatric simulation societies (The International Pediatric Simulation Society, International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research & Education, and Netzwerk Kindersimulation e.V.) between April 27, 2020, and May 18, 2020., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Description of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic simulation-based preparation activities of pediatric acute and critical care healthcare providers. The Delphi process included 20 content experts and required three rounds to reach consensus. The survey was completed by 234 participants (42.2%) from 19 countries. Preparation differed significantly between the geographic regions, with 79.3% of Anglo-American/Anglo-Saxon, 82.6% of Indian, and 47.1% of European participants initiating specifically coronavirus disease 2019-related simulation activities. Frequent modifications to existing simulation programs included the use of telesimulation and virtual reality training. Forty-nine percent of institutions discontinued noncoronavirus disease 2019-related simulation training., Conclusions: The swift incorporation of disease-specific sessions and the transition of standard education to virtual or hybrid simulation training modes occurred frequently. The approach used, however, depended heavily on local requirements, limitations, and circumstances. In particular, the use of telesimulation allowed education to continue while maintaining social distancing requirements., Competing Interests: Dr. Calhoun’s institution received funding from Sanofi Pasteur and he received funding from the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Members of an emergency department (ED) staff need to be prepared for mass casualty incidents (MCIs) at all times. Didactic sessions, drills, and functional exercises have shown to be effective, but it is challenging to find time and resources for appropriate training. We conducted brief, task-specific drills (deemed "disaster huddles") in a pediatric ED (PED) to examine if such an approach could be an alternative or supplement to traditional MCI training paradigms. Over the course of the study, we observed an improving trend in the overall score for administrative disaster preparedness. Disaster huddles may be an effective way to improve administrative disaster preparedness in the PED. Low-effort, low-time commitment education could be an attractive way for further disaster preparedness efforts. Further studies are indicated to show a potential impact on lasting behavior and patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the staff perception of a global positioning system (GPS) as a patient tracking tool at an emergency department (ED) receiving patients from a simulated mass casualty event. Methods: During a regional airport disaster drill a plane crash with 46 pediatric patients was simulated. Personnel from airport fire, municipal fire, law enforcement, emergency medical services, and emergency medicine departments were present. Twenty of the 46 patient actors required transport for medical evaluation, and we affixed GPS devices to 12 of these actors. At the hospital, ED staff including attending physicians, fellows and nurses working in the ED during the time of the drill accessed a map through an application that provided real-time geolocation of these devices. The primary outcome was staff reception of the GPS device as assessed via Likert scale survey after the event. The secondary outcomes were free text feedback from staff and event debriefing observations. Results: Queried registered nurses, attending physicians, and pediatric emergency medicine fellows perceived the GPS device as an advantage for patient care during a disaster. The GPS device allowed multiple-screen real-time tracking and improved situational awareness in cases with and without EMS radio communication prior to arrival at the hospital. Conclusion: ED staff reported that the use of GPS trackers in a disaster improved real-time tracking and could potentially improve patient management during a mass casualty event. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]