Search

Relapsing diffuse large B cell lymphomas (rDLBCL) represent a heterogeneous disease. This heterogeneity should be recognized and reflected, because it can deform the interpretation of clinical trial results. DLBCL patients with the first relapse and without CNS involvement were identified in the Czech Lymphoma Study Group (CLSG) database. Interval-to-therapy (ITT) was defined as the time between the first manifestation of rDLBCL and the start of any treatment. The overall survival (OS) of different ITT cohorts (< 7 vs. 7-21 vs. > 21 days) was compared. In total, 587 rDLBCLs (51.8% males) progressed with a median of 12.8 months (range 1.6 to 152.3) since the initial diagnosis (2000-2017). At the time of relapse, the median age was 67 years (range 22-95). First-line therapy was administered in 99.3% of the patients; CHOP and anti-CD20 were given to 69.2% and 84.7% of the patients, respectively. The salvage immune/chemotherapy was administered in 88.1% of the patients (39.2% platinum-based regimen). The median ITT was 20 days (range 1-851), but 23.2% of patients initiated therapy within 7 days. The 5-year OS was 17.4% (range 10-24.5%) vs. 20.5% (range 13.5-27.4%) vs. 42.2% (range 35.5-48.8%) for ITT < 7 vs. 7-21 vs. > 21 days (p < 0.001). ITT was associated with B symptoms (p 0.004), ECOG (p < 0.001), stage (p 0.002), bulky disease (p 0.005), elevated LDH (p < 0.001), and IPI (p < 0.001). The ITT mirrors the real clinical behavior of rDLBCL. There are patients (ITT < 7 days) with aggressive disease and a poor outcome. Conversely, there are rDLBCLs with ITT ≥ 21 days who survive for a long time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We have investigated whether the addition of rituximab to methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, radiotherapy and cytarabine was associated with improved outcome of primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL). Of 164 patients, 49 received rituximab. Median age was 63 years, median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 60 and median follow-up of living patients was 59.5 months. 1- and 2-year PFS were 49.7 and 37.9%, 1- and 2-year OS were 57.0 and 45.3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS) was significantly better for patients treated with rituximab (22.9 vs. 10.9 months,p = 0.037). In multivariate analysis, age ≤70 years and KPS ≥90 were predictive for PFS and OS, rituximab was an independent prognostic factor for PFS only. In landmark analyses, rituximab was not found beneficial for long-term survivors and no group particularly benefited from rituximab. In conclusion, addition of rituximab was associated with improved PFS, but not OS in this unselected cohort of PCNSL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rituximab maintenance (RM) improves time to progression (PFS) in advanced follicular lymphoma (FL), but the impact of various RM schedules remains unknown. This study performed a retrospective evaluation of RM given for up to 2 years vs observation in 319 untreated FL patients (stage II–IV; grade 1–3A) responding to RCHOP induction and a comparison of two different RM schedules (RM8 = eight doses given every 3 months and RM12 = 12 doses given every 2 months). A total of 183 patients received RM and 136 patients were observed; 5-year PFS was better in the RM arm, 74.1% vs 52.3% (p< 0.001), which was projected in 5-year OS 93.8% vs 87.5% (p = 0.005). However, 5-year PFS was similar in both the RM8 (n = 54) and RM12 (n = 56) arms. In the first line, RM significantly prolongs PFS and OS in FL, but different RM schedules bring a similar benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]