Search

Background: Conventional radiographs of hands and feet are used to depict structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is also commonly done in clinical practice in symptomatic patients at risk for RA (clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA)), but its rationale is unclear. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of radiographic erosive disease in patients with CSA and its progression over time., Methods: Patients with symptomatic arthralgia of the Leiden CSA cohort were studied during 2-year follow-up or until development of inflammatory arthritis (IA). Erosive disease was defined according to the radiologist, or according to the RA-specific erosive definition in light of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2010 RA criteria. Serial radiographs were evaluated according to the Sharp van der Heijde Scoring method (SHS) and radiographic erosive progression was determined. Additionally, it was evaluated if baseline erosive disease associated with IA development. Analyses were stratified for anticitrullinated protein antibody status., Results: 1497 radiographs of hands and feet of 749 patients with CSA were studied. Median SHS-erosion score at baseline was 0 (IQR 0-1). RA-specific erosive disease was present in 1.7% according to the radiologist, and 2.5% according to the ACR/EULAR criteria. No patients with CSA progressed ≥5 SHS-erosion points during follow-up. Erosive disease at CSA onset was not associated with IA development (HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.44))., Conclusions: At CSA onset, radiographic erosive disease is rare. In addition, it is rarely progressive within the CSA phase and not predictive for IA development. Therefore, for clinical practice, routinely made radiographs of hands and feet (such as regularly done at RA diagnosis) can be omitted in the at-risk stage of arthralgia., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AvdH is an editorial board member for RMD open. Otherwise none., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Subclinical joint inflammation in patients with arthralgia is predictive for progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the time course of progression for bone marrow edema (osteitis), synovitis, and/or tenosynovitis is unsettled. This longitudinal study assessed the course of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected subclinical joint inflammation during progression to RA., Methods: Patients that progressed from clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) to RA underwent 1.5-T MRI of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), wrist, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints at presentation with arthralgia and at first identification of synovitis assessed through physical examination (n = 31). MRIs were evaluated for osteitis, synovitis, tenosynovitis, and erosions by two readers, blinded for clinical data and order in time. To estimate changes in MRI scores between the asymptomatic state and CSA onset, scores of MRI features at CSA baseline were compared with scores from age-matched symptom-free persons., Results: At presentation with CSA, synovitis and tenosynovitis scores were higher than scores from age-matched symptom-free persons (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). Anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive arthralgia patients also had increased osteitis scores (p = 0.04). Median duration between presentation with arthralgia and RA development was 17 weeks. During progression to RA, synovitis and osteitis increased significantly (p = 0.001 and p = 0.036, respectively) in contrast to tenosynovitis and erosion scores. This pattern was similar in both ACPA subsets, although statistical significance was reached for synovitis and osteitis in ACPA-negative but not ACPA-positive RA., Conclusion: Increased tenosynovitis and synovitis scores at CSA onset and the increase in synovitis and osteitis during progression to RA suggest an 'outside-in' temporal relationship of arthritis development, in particular for ACPA-negative RA. For ACPA-positive RA, further studies are needed.

Objectives: Recently a EULAR-taskforce defined arthralgia suspicious for progression to RA, in order to allow inclusion of homogeneous sets of arthralgia patients in clinical studies. This longitudinal study aimed (i) to validate this definition in arthralgia patients in whom rheumatologists felt that imminent RA was more likely than other arthralgias [clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA)], that is, the target population fulfilling the entry criterion, and (ii) to explore the performance in arthralgia patients who were referred to secondary care prior to rheumatological evaluation, hence ignoring the entry criterion., Methods: The definition was assessed in 241 Dutch patients identified with CSA by rheumatologists and 113 patients referred to the Umeå university hospital with recent-onset arthralgia in small joints. The external reference was arthritis development <2 years' follow-up., Results: CSA patients with a positive definition (⩾3/7 parameters present) had an increased risk for developing arthritis compared with definition-negative CSA patients (hazard ratio = 2.1, 95% CI: 0.9, 4.7). The sensitivity was 84% and the positive predictive value 30%. In arthralgia patients in whom the definition was applied before rheumatological evaluation, a positive definition was neither sensitive (10%) nor predictive (positive predictive value 3%)., Conclusion: The EULAR definition of arthralgia suspicious for progression to RA is sensitive when used to support the rheumatologist's opinion on imminent RA. This validation study shows that the definition, when used as designed, further homogenizes patients that rheumatologists consider at risk for RA. To arrive at a high specificity, the clinical definition needs to be combined with biomarkers., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Objective: Peripheral bone mineral density (BMD) may be decreased in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but it is unknown whether BMD loss emerges before arthritis is clinically apparent. We aimed to study whether BMD loss occurs in patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA), and whether it is associated with progression to clinical arthritis and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected subclinical inflammation.Method: Patients with CSA had arthralgia for <1 year and were at risk of progressing to RA according to their rheumatologists. At baseline, a 1.5 T MRI was performed of unilateral metacarpophalangeal, wrist, and metatarsophalangeal joints, and scored on synovitis, bone marrow oedema, and tenosynovitis;. summing these features yielded the total MRI inflammation score. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) was used to estimate BMD on two sequential conventional hand radiographs (mean interval between radiographs 4.4 months). The change in BMD was studied; BMD loss was defined as a decrease of ≥2.5 mg/cm2/month. Patients were followed for arthritis development for a median of 18.4 months.Results: In CSA patients (n = 108), change in BMD was negatively associated with age (β = -0.03, p = 0.007). BMD loss in CSA patients was associated with arthritis development [adjusted for age hazard ratio (HR) = 6.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 to 21.4] and was most frequently estimated in the months before clinical arthritis development. The total MRI inflammation scores were associated with the change in BMD (adjusted for age β = -0.05, p = 0.047). The total MRI inflammation score and BMD loss were both independently associated with arthritis development (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.2, and HR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 17.2, respectively).Conclusion: In CSA patients, severe BMD loss is associated with MRI-detectable subclinical inflammation and with progression to clinical arthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]