Search

Aim. To evaluate the single pill combination with lisinopril, amlodipine and indapamide ability in additional angioprotection achievement in patients with arterial hypertension and high pulse wave velocity (PWV) regardless on previous antihypertensive therapy (AHT).Material and methods. To the open non-randomized study duration 12 weeks 40 patients were included taking triple AHT during 6 months. All participants underwent ambulatory 24 hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring, applanation tonometry (augmentation index and central BP), pulse wave velocity assessment, laboratory tests (HbA1c, serum uric acid, high sensitive C-reactive protein [hsCRP], serum uric acid).Results. We observed additional systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) reduction by 16.9% and 22.11% on lisinopril, amlodipine and indapamide single pill combination. Lisinopril, amlodipine and indapamide single pill combination decreased 24 h mean SBP by 16.77%, and 24 h mean DBP -23.5% (ABPM data), PWV by 19.7%, augmentation index by 14.81%, central SBP by 11.9% (p

Aim. To assess the healthcare system costs for the management of patients with heart failure (HF) based on a retrospective analysis of primary medical documentation.Material and methods. We performed the analysis of outpatient records of 1000 patients, followed up for 1 year by a general practitioner or cardiologist in ambulatory clinic in 7 Russian regions. The assessment of the HF socioeconomic burden was carried out from the perspective of the state. A bottom-up approach was applied to the cost analysis. To calculate the average costs per patient per year, the costs for each patient were calculated, followed by estimation for the entire cohort. Direct costs (medical: outpatient care, inpatient care, drug therapy; nonmedical: disability pensions and temporary disability) and indirect costs (loss of gross domestic product) were estimated.Results. It was shown that the average cost of managing 1 HF patient is RUB 160338 per year. The cost of drug therapy varied significantly depending on the source of funding. So, the total therapy cost was about RUB 90000 per year, while within the drug assistance programs — about RUB 7000 per year. Thus, the proportion of drug therapy in cost pattern per patient from the state’s perspective was only 4,7%, while the maximum costs were for inpatient care (45,5%), stay in intensive care units (16,4%) and disability payments (21,6%). The direct costs for HF therapy, with the exception of drug therapy (examination, inpatient and outpatient treatment), averages RUB 108291 per year. The total direct nonmedical and indirect costs per HF patient per year were about RUB 44519 per year. It should be noted that the rehabilitation costs were not included in the calculation.Conclusion. Taking into account the significant burden of HF on the Russian healthcare system, the growing costs of healthcare and the increase in life expectancy, prevention and treatment of HF should be improved. The development of a HF centers’ network, creating a seamless system of HF care, as well as improving the availability of medication therapy and the inpatient management of patients can improve the healthcare quality for HF patients in Russia.

Aim. To evaluate the potential of a fixed-dose combination of lisinopril+amlodipine+rosuvastatin (Equamer®) in achieving additional vascular protection in patients with hypertension and high pulse wave velocity (PWV) after severe and very severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), complicated by bilateral multisegmental viral pneumonia, with the use of biological therapy, who had not previously received combination antihypertensive therapy.Material and methods. This 12-week open-label observational study included 30 patients with or without antihypertensive therapy. The patients underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, applanation tonometry (determination of the augmentation index (AI) and central blood pressure (CBP)), PWV measurement, blood laboratory tests (lipid profile, fasting glucose, C-reactive protein, complete blood count, ferritin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, uric acid) before and after switch to a fixed-dose combination of lisinopril+amlodipine+rosuvastatin.Results. At baseline, the patients had an increase in office blood pressure (BP) up to 152,6/89,1 mm Hg. After prescribing a fixed-dose combination of lisinopril+amlodipine+rosuvastatin, there was a decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 15,8% and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 12,2%. According to 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, the decrease in SBP was 15%, DBP — by 9%, PWV — by 23,8%, AI — by 9%, CBP — by 12,4% (p

Aim. To assess the possibility of azilsartan medoxomil to achieve target blood pressure (BP) (less than 130/80 mm Hg), to study angioprotective features and reduction of adipokines levels and inflammatory markers in patients with hypertension and previous therapy with other ARBs.Material and methods. In open observational study with 24 weeks follow-up were included 60 patients with previous therapy (losartan or valsartan or telmisartan).All patients underwent ambulatory BP monitoring, applanation tonometry (determination of the augmentation index and central BP), measurement of the pulse wave velocity, laboratory tests (lipid profile, uric acid, fasting glucose, Homeostasis Model Assessment, homocysteine, leptin, adiponectin, highly sensitive C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6).Results. Azilsartan provided the systolic BP (29,05%, 22,5% and 8,9%) and diastolic BP reduction 18,82%, 20,46% and 8,54% (p

Aim. To assess the healthcare system costs for the management of patients with heart failure (HF) based on a retrospective analysis of primary medical documentation.Material and methods. We performed the analysis of outpatient records of 1000 patients, followed up for 1 year by a general practitioner or cardiologist in ambulatory clinic in 7 Russian regions. The study included men and women over 18 years of age with an established class II-IV HF and at least one hospitalization due to acute decompensated HF within 12-month follow-up.Results. The final analysis included 888 patients (men, 52,9%; women, 47,1%; mean age, 69 [61; 78] years). The preserved ejection fraction (EF) was detected in 47,86% of patients, mid-range — in 40,54%, reduced — in 11,6%. Only in 16% of patients, there was improved by 1 or more HF. Hypertension and coronary artery disease were predominant in etiology pattern of HF. Preserved EF was more often detected in women over 60 years of age, with HTN and obesity, as well as with HF with mid-range and reduced EF in men in the same age group. There was sufficient follow-up rate, but the extent examinations do not correspond to the recommended one. The prescription rate of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors corresponds to the recommended one, but there is a high frequency of prescribing angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). The prescription rate of β-blockers and loop diuretics (mainly torasemide) increased in comparison with previous studies, while thiazide diuretics — decreased. In patients with reduced EF, the prescription rate of sacubitril/valsartan was only 14,7%, β-blockers — 83,3%, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MCRA) — 72,5%. In patients with midrange EF, there was a sharp decrease in prescription rate of RAAS inhibitors, β-blockers, MCRA.Conclusion. The practical follow-up of patients with HF differs significantly from clinical guidelines. Due to inadequate pharmacotherapy, as well as insufficient noncompliance with the recommended extent of investigations, 1-year HF therapy does not lead to a pronounced improvement in the patients' class.

Aim. To assess azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) in achieving the target blood pressure (BP) (

Aim. Evaluation of the ability of fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide (Noliprel Bi Forte) to achieve additional angioprotection in patients with arterial hypertension already reached target blood pressure (BP) at previous antihypertension therapy with losartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT).Material and methods. To open observational study, lasting 12 weeks, 25 patients included, those who had been taking losartan+HCT 100/12,5 mg. Results. During the study, all patients underwent 24 hour BP monitoring, applanation tonometry (augmentation index assessment and of central BP), measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV), laboratory tests (lipids, fasting glucose, HOMA index, homocystein, leptin, adiponectin, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), vascular age assessment). After shifting the therapy with losartan and HCT to combination perindopril and indapamide, BP decreased additionally by 3,9%, and diastolic BP — 5,4% (p

Aim. Evaluation of the ability of the fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin (Equamer) in achievement of additional angioprotection in patients with systemic arterial hypertension (AH) and high pulse wave velocity (PWV), regardless of previous antihypertensive therapy (AHT).Material and methods. To the open multicenter observational study 24 weeks duration, 60 patients included, taking double AHT during 6 months. All participants underwent ambulatory 24 hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring, applanation tonometry (augmentation index and central BP), pulse wave velocity assessment, laboratory tests (lipids, fasting glucose, insulin resistance index (HOMA), leptin, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) before and after transition to the fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin (Equamer).Results. By the data from office BP measurement, after transition of patients from the double combinations to fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin, there was additional decrease of systolic BP (SBP) by 14,3% and diastolic BP (DBP) by 18,5%. By the data from ABPM, decrease of SBP was 16,1%, and DBP — 21,8%. Combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin decreased PWV by 14,4%, augmentation index by 14,5%, central SBP by 8,1% (p

Life quality (LQ) is an integrated parameter of the health, applied for integral characterization of population health, and as the parameter of healthcare interventions effectiveness.Aim. To assess LQ in Russian population at the age 25-64 y. o. in general and in various socio-economical groups using EQ-5D, by the results of ESSE-RF (2012-2013) study.Material and methods. LQ was assessed on representative selections of inhabitants of 13 Russian Federation regions, aged 25-64 (males 8327, females 13497) with response 80%. LQ was assessed via international questionnaire EUROQOL — EQ-5D: 1) no decline; 2) mild decline; 3) significant decline; scoring also performed with visualanalogue scale (VAS). Integral LQ by EUROQOL performed with Shaw JW et al. method (ranging from 0,0 (death) to 1,0 (perfect health)).Result. EQ-5D index of Russian population was 0,87 with no gender difference. By the increase of the age LQ declines. Educational gradient of LQ was significant only in VAS (p

Aim. To assess rate of familiarity and specifics of treatment with statins among the citizens of economically active age with various cardiovascular risk by the data from epidemiological study ESSE-RF (Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases in Different Russian Federation Regions). Material and methods. In the work the data from ESSE-RF study was used, of representative selection of non-organized male and female inhabitants aged 25-64 y.o. from 13 regions, investigated during 2012-2014. Responded ~80%. The study included questionning by standard scale that included data on the anamnesis, etc. Lipid profile, including total cholesterol (TC), cholesterol of lipoproteids low and high density were measured at SSRCPM and RSPCC.Results. Analysis of the whole selection showed that 20% of men and 32% of women knew their TC, and 13,6% and 18,2% were even familiar having increased level of TC. Part of those with high and very high risk was 31,3%, incl. men — 42,2%, women — 30,9%. Statins took ~7,0% of patients from this risk category. Effectiveness of treatment (target levels reached of low density cholesterol) in these groups of men and women was 14,4% and 4,8%, respectively.Conclusion. The data obtained in populational study points on insufficient knowledge and low rate of statin treatment of the persons with high and very high cardiovascular risk in RF, which confirms the anxiety provoking data of registries and other studies. The data dictates necessity of development and implementation of specific educational programs for citizens, of physician improvement and availability of cheap but effective lipid-lowering medications.

Aim. To study the prevalence of ischemic heart disease as one of the most common cardiovascular disorders, together with arterial hypertension (AH), diabetes mellitus (DM) and liver diseases (LD) in adult (25-64 y.o.) population of selected RF regions, the variance of those with gender and age, and association of cardiovascular risk factors (FR).Material and methods. Into analysis we included the results of representative selections studies from 13 RF regions, studied according to the program of multicenter study ESSE-RF during the years 2012­2014; totally 21923 patients studied. Investigation included standard questioning, including anamnesis. For statistics we used applied software SAS.Results. In men the prevalence of IHD is associated with the growth of comorbidity from 0 in the age group 25-34 y. to 77% in the age 55-64 y., almost duplicating every decade. For women there is analogic tendency, less prominent. In men there are significant associations only with AH, which increases the risk of IHD 2,5 times, though in women together with AH the associations are significant for LD. Comorbidities with DM do not influence the prevalence of IHD in men and women. At the same time, any association with two diseases increases the risk of IHD >304 times. The most negative is the association of all three diseases, with which IHD is 8,7 times more prevalent, than in their absence. Using multidimensional logistic regression after correction for the age and comorbidity in the patients with IHD of both genders, there are associations revealed of high density cholesterol lipoproteids (HDL) in blood and abdominal obesity. In men there are also positive associations with smoking and negative — with increased cholesterol.Conclusion. Comorbidities of IHD with AH, DM and LD in adult population are common, are associated with the general FR, are increasing with the age. Taking modern tendencies of population ageing, it is plausible to expect an increase of the prevalence of comorbidities, that requires a necessity of the healthcare services to these changes.

Aim. To study social and economic gradients — educational and occupational statuses, wealth level, behavioral risk factors (FR) in Russian population by the ESSE-RF data.Material and methods. The data for the analysis consisted of representative selections of 13 regions of RF (n=22906) participants of the study, incl. men (n=8353) and women (n=13553) of 25-64 y.o., with response 80%. We calculated the odds ratios for the presence of behavioral FR: smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, insufficient physical activity (IPA), nonrational food consumption, anxiety and depressive disorders, — in persons from different social and economic groups by education level, type of inhabitation, professional status, wealth level.Results. Higher education was associated with better FR profile, except IPA (negative association) and alcohol consumption (absence of association). "White in general had less FR probability than Blue, excl. IPA and psychoemotional deviations (in men). As for the wealth association with the FR there is backward gradient, i.e. lesser the income, higher the risk of FR presence, excl. IPA and excessive alcohol intake in women. For example, in very wealthy men the odds ratio for depressive states was 3,09 [95% CI 2,08-4,57] comparing to the persons with low income. The type of territory of inhabitance was associated with less behavioral FR in Russian population, as significant associations are found only for depression and excessive salt consumption in both genders and IPA in men. Conclusion. The significant social and economic gradients of behavioral FR prevalence are found, the direction of those is not necessary the same as in European countries. The analysis of association with social and economic parameters would help to develop the directed preventive interventions.

In the frame of Multicenter observational study ECVD-RF (Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases and their Risk Factors in Regions of Russian Federation) by the unique protocol the investigation of representative selections of adult population at the age of 25-64 y.o. of 11 regions RF (n=18305, including males, n=6919 and females n=11386): Volgograd, Vologda, Voronezh, Ivanovo, Kemerovo, Orenburg, Samara, Tomsk, Tyumen, Saint-Petersburg and Northern Osetia-Alania. The prevalence of the following risk factors (RF) of cardiovascular diseases is evaluated: high blood pressure — 33,8%, obesity — 29,7%, high total cholesterol — 57,6%, high glucose level or diabetes — 4,6%, smoking (tobacco consumption) — 25,7%, insufficient (low) level of physical activity — 38,8%, excessive salt consumption — 49,9% and insufficient vegetables and fruits consumption — 41,9%. Gender differences and an increase with the age of the parameters mentioned are described.The absence of a epidemiologic monitoring system at the Federal level leads to an impossibility of clear conclusions on the RF dynamics in Russian population. While comparing the ECVD-RF study with previous epidemiological studies we can just cautiously suppose the existence in 21st age of negative dynamics of one RF (obesity, dyslipidemia) and positive dynamics of the others (smoking).

Aim. To study prevalence of arterial hypertension (AH), mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), awareness of patients about their disease, medication consumption (MC) and efficacy of treatment in several regions of Russia.Material and methods. Representative selections were made in 9 regions of Russia: men (n=5563), women (n=9737) of 25–64 y.o., studied in 2012–2013 with the response 80%. Systematic stratified multilevel random selection was formed with localilty criteria (Kisch method). The Questionnaire on the presence of AH included: awareness of the patient about his disease, drug intake. BP measurement was performed on the right arm by automatic tonometer Omron in sitting position after 5 minutes resting. The mean value of two measurements was used. BP defined as SBP ≥140 mmHg, DBP ≥90 mmHg, or if the patient had taken antihypertensive therapy. Efficacy of treatment — the part of patients (in %) who reached target BP. Control group — part of patients (in %) with BP

Aim. To compare clinical effectiveness and tolerability of the fixed-dose combinations of lisinopril/amlodipine (Ekvator) and enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide (Co-renitec) in high and very-high risk patients with Stage I–II arterial hypertension, whose blood pressure (BP) levels were not normalised during the preceding antihypertensive monotherapy.Material and methods. This blind, randomised (envelope method), parallel study included 27 patients in each group. For 6 months, participants received the first medication (1 tablet a day, in the morning). After the 14-day wash-out phase, they were switched to another medication and received either Ekvator (lisinopril 10 mg plus amlodipine 5 mg) or Co-renitec (enalapril 20 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12,5 mg).Results. After 6 months of the treatment, more than 78% of the patients receiving Ekvator achieved target BP levels, in contrast to the participants receiving Co-renitec. Moreover, the treatment with Ekvator was associated with a significant reduction in the myocardial thickness of the posterior left ventricular wall and the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, as well as with a significant improvement in lipid metabolism parameters.Conclusion. Ekvator was more effective than Co-renitec in terms of antihypertensive activity, left ventricular hypertrophy reduction, and arterial elasticity improvement, as well as trough/peak ratio improvement.

Aim. To assess the antihypertensive effectiveness of perindopril А and losartan and their influence on the main cardiovascular risk factors among patients with arterial hypertension and obesity. Material and methods. This single-blind, randomised, comparative parallel study included patients either untreated with antihypertensive medications or in the end of the two-week wash-out period. All patients were randomised (random envelope method) into 2 groups: Group I (n=30) received perindopril А (Prestarium A, Servier; 10 mg/d), while Group II (n=30) was administered losartan (Cozaar, Merck Sharp & Dohme; 100 mg/d) for 24 weeks. The examination included 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (SpaceLabs 90207, USA), the measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index, and central aortal pressure (Sphygmocor), and standard echocardiography (EchoCG) (ALOKA prosound L7 premier). Results. In the perindopril А group, 24-hour levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) decreased by 15,2% and 18,1%, respectively; in the losartan group, this reduction was 7,8% (p

Objective: to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and effect of nebivolol and valsartan on metabolic parameters and erective function in patients with hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and erectile dysfunction. Subjects and methods. A 12-week randomized, blind, controlled, parallel-group, comparative (nebivolol versus valsartan) trial enrolled 40 patients with hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and erectile dysfunction. Results. There were no significant differences between the drugs in their antihypertensive efficiency. Nebivolol exerted a more pronounced positive effect on cardioand angioprotection and lipid and carbohydrate metabolic parameters. It had no negative effect on metabolic parameters. Therapy with nebivolol versus valsartan produced a pronounced positive effect on blood androgen levels and erectile function. Moreover, the quality-of-life indicators also showed a significant improvement in the nebivolol group. Evaluation of the tolerability and adverse reactions of the drugs demonstrated no side effects in both groups.

The aim of the study was to assess the possibility of fixed combination Lisinopril + amlodipine + rozuvastatin to improve arterial elesticity in patients with hypertension and high pulse wave velocity, despite previous diuretic-based combination antihypertensive therapy. Materials and methods. In an open, observational study duration of 24 weeks was included 60 patients on previous diuretic-based combination antihypertensive therapy. All participants underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, applanation tonometry (augmentation index and central blood pressure), pulse wave velocity measurement, laboratory tests (lipid profile, fasting glucose, insulin resistance index - NOMA), leptin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein before and after the switching to a fixed combination of lisinopril + amlodipine + rosuvastatin. Results. According to measurements of office blood pressure switching of patients on double combinations based on diuretics to a fixed combination of lisinopril + amlodipine + rosuvastatin, a further decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 13.7% and diastolic BP (DBP) by 18.8% was observed. According to the ABPM, the decline in the average daily SBP was 15.8%, DBP - 22.5%, average SBP - 16.2%, DBP - 19.8%. The combination of lisinopril + amlodipine + rosuvastatin reduced PWV by 15.9%, augmentation index by 13.5%, central SBP by 8.4% (p

Aim: to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and effects of telmisartan and losartan on metabolic parameters in patients with arterial hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Subjects and methods. A blind randomized, controlled, parallel group comparative (telmisartan versus losartan for 24 weeks) trial enrolled 60 patients with arterial hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Results. Significant differences were found in favor of telmisartan in antihypertensive activity, cardio-, angio-, and nephroprotection and ability to improve lipid and carbohydrate metabolic parameters. Only did telmisartan reduce the manifestations of insulin resistance and hyperleptinemia in patients with hypertension and obesity. Therapy with telmisartan versus losartan exerted a pronounced positive effect on anthropometric parameters and fat deposition rate. The drugs were found to be well tolerated and to cause no adverse reactions in both groups.