Search

Airborne bacteria and particulate matter (PM) emitted from animal houses may harm the environment and threaten on-farm and off-farm bio-security. Airborne transmission of PM and bacteria occurs more easily between double-tunnel ventilation layer hen houses with side-to-side arrangement due to the layout of inlet and outlet, and the accumulation of airborne contaminants in the intermediate region. This study practically applied shading nets for covering exhaust area and water disinfection for evaporative cooling system to prevent airborne transmission of PM and microbial aerosols between layer hen houses. Differences of PM and airborne culturable bacteria (CB) concentrations in control group and experimental group were used to evaluate the contaminants blocking effect of the treatment. PM and airborne microbial concentrations between houses were significantly higher than the upwind. Shading nets used as a barrier of PM and airborne bacteria had no significant effect on the reduction of inlet PM and airborne CB concentration of layer hen houses. The airborne CB concentration after evaporative cooling pads with water could be several times higher than that before. However, airborne CB concentration after the evaporative cooling pads with water disinfection was much lower than that before. Results indicated that shading net as a barrier of PM and airborne bacteria could hardly bring down contaminants concentrations near the inlet. Water disinfection for evaporative cooling system could largely reduce the inlet airborne CB concentration. Inlet air purification of animal houses is an effective way to prevent airborne microorganisms transmission., (© 2019 Poultry Science Association Inc.)

Electrolyzed water (EW) is an effective disinfectant with a wide range of pH. EW in acid range was proved to be an ammonia absorbent which make it valuable for wet scrubbers used in animal feeding operations (AFOs). This study aimed to optimize the design and operating parameters of a wet scrubber with EW spray for ammonia removal, based on the size distribution of droplets, the property of EW and the reduction efficiency of ammonia. The optimized parameters included droplet size, nozzle flow rates, pH and available chlorine concentration (ACC) of EW, nozzle number at single stage, stage number, initial ammonia concentration and air speed in the duct. The ammonia removal efficiency increased with the decrease of droplet size and the increase of flow rate. The pH values of EW showed significant influence on ammonia removal efficiency (P ˂ 0.05), while ACC of the EW showed no significant influence (P > 0.05). For inlet ammonia concentration of 70 ppm with one and three spray stages, the wet scrubber with EW (pH = 1.35) spray was able to reduce 55.8 ± 4.3 % and 97.2 ± 3.0 % of ammonia, respectively, when the nozzles with 0.9 mm orifice diameter operated at a flow rate of 1.20 L min -1 . Response surface analysis showed that orifice diameter, nozzle flow rate, and their combination were all significant factors impacting ammonia removal efficiency for both pH =1.35 and 5.50 at a 95% confidence level. Optimal ammonia removal efficiency was obtained at orifice diameter 0.9 mm and flow rate 1.20 L min -1 within the selected range. The results of this study demonstrated that wet scrubber with EW spray could be a very effective and feasible ammonia mitigation technology for animal feeding operation. Implications: It is difficult to effectively reduce ammonia emitted from the animal feeding operations (AFOs). Both the acidity and disinfection effects of electrolyzed water (EW) make it a potential absorbent used for spray in wet scrubber to reduce the ammonia and microorganisms. Based on some preliminary field test results, lab tests were conducted to optimize the design and operation parameters of a wet scrubber with EW spray to improve the ammonia removal efficiency. A better understanding of the application and influence factors of the wet scrubber with EW spray can contribute to effective mitigation of ammonia emission from animal houses and improve the atmosphere air quality.

Airborne microorganisms, especially the pathogenic microorganisms, emitted from animal feeding operations (AFOs) may harm the environment and public health and threaten the biosecurity of the farm and surrounding environment. Electrolyzed water (EW), which was considered to be an environmentally friendly disinfectant, may be a potential spraying medium of wet scrubber for airborne microorganism emission reduction. A laboratory test was conducted to investigate the airborne bacteria (CB) removal efficiency of the wet scrubber by EW spray with different designs and operating parameters. Both the available choline (AC) initial loss rate and AC traveling loss rate of acidic electrolyzed water (AEW; pH = 1.35) were much higher than those of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW; pH = 5.50). Using one spraying stage with 4 m sec -1 air speed in the duct, the no detect lines (NDLs) of SAEW (pH = 5.50) for airborne Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella enteritidis removal were all 50 mg L -1 , whereas the NDLs of AEW (pH = 1.35) for airborne E. coli, S. aureus, and S. enteritidis removal increased to 70, 90, and 90 mg L -1 , respectively. The NDLs of SAEW (pH = 5.50) for airborne E. coli, S. aureus, and S. enteritidis were lower than those of AEW (pH = 1.35) at single spraying stage. Increase in the number of stages lowered the NDLs of both SAEW (pH = 5.50) and AEW (pH = 1.35) for airborne E. coli, S. aureus, and S. enteritidis. EW with a higher available chlorine concentration (ACC) was needed at air speed of 6 m sec -1 to reach the same airborne CB removal efficiency as that at air speed of 4 m sec -1 . The results of this study demonstrated that EW spray wet scrubbers could be a very effective and feasible airborne CB mitigation technology for AFOs. Implications: It is difficult to effectively reduce airborne bacteria emitted from animal feeding operations (AFOs). Electrolyzed water (EW) with disinfection effect and acidity is a potential absorbent for spray in wet scrubber to remove microorganisms and ammonia. Based on the field test results, a laboratory experiment we conducted this time was to optimize the design and operation parameters to improve the airborne bacteria removal efficiency. A better understanding of the EW application in the wet scrubber can contribute to the mitigation of airborne bacteria from animal houses and improve the atmosphere air quality.