Search

Study Design: The current study of 251 consecutive 1-level anterior cervical reconstructions was undertaken to compare the incidence of dysphagia between cervical disk replacement and conventional anterior cervical fusion and instrumentation., Objectives: This is a report of 251 patients from 5 investigational centers in the Food and drug Administration's prospective, randomized porous-coated motion (PCM) trial using a validated dysphagia outcomes instrument. The dysphagia data for both PCM and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients were reviewed from 5 centers to (1) compare the severity of dysphagia, (2) compare the postoperative incidence of dysphagia, and (3) to compare the resolution of perioperative dysphagia., Summary of Background Data: Dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior surgical approaches to the cervical spine have been previously reported. The current prospective, randomized investigation quantifies clinical dysphagia based on 3 criteria-severity, incidence, and resolution-in a time-course evaluation., Methods: Patients between 18 and 65 years with 1-level symptomatic cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy for progressive neurologic symptoms, were randomized to undergo anterior decompression and PCM arthroplasty (N=151) or ACDF (control) (N=100). Patients self-reported dysphagia severity using the Bazaz scale preoperatively and at follow-up. The Bazaz scale has 4 classes of severity based upon the problems with swallowing that the patient has with both liquids and solids., Results: The Bazaz results demonstrate that although both the PCM and ACDF groups exhibited an initial postoperative problem with swallowing, the PCM group continued to improve with increasing time after implantation, whereas the ACDF only improved minimally. The PCM treatments indicated significantly lower incidence of dysphagia at 3 and 12 months postoperatively compared with ACDF controls (P<0.05). An increase in dysphagia severity at either the 6-week or 3-month follow-up visit was reported in 35 (42%) PCM and 29 (64%) ACDF subjects. Long-term resolution of these symptoms was noted in 74% (26/35) of the PCM subjects as compared with 41.4% (12/29) of the ACDF subjects (P=0.015)., Conclusions: In a prospective randomized clinical study the incidence of postoperative dysphagia and the long-term resolution of the dysphagia was greatly improved in the PCM group compared with the instrumented ACDF control group.

Study Design: Prospective 6-center study. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate outcomes of cervical disc replacement performed adjacent to a prior cervical fusion., Summary of Background Data: The use of disc replacement adjacent to a prior anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is an attractive reconstructive option, obviating the need for a multilevel fusion. This study reports outcomes from patients with and without previous ACDF receiving the porous coated motion (PCM) artificial cervical disc in a United States Federal Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trials., Methods: Patients between ages of 18 and 65 with single-level cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of nonsurgical therapy, or experiencing progressive neurologic symptoms were enrolled. Clinical outcomes are compared for patients receiving a PCM disc at a level adjacent to a prior ACDF ("adjacent") and those without having previously had fusion ("primary")., Results: 126 PCM patients were primary (mean age: 44.4 years.) and 26 patients had previous "adjacent level" fusion surgery (mean age: 46.4 years). Surgery time was similar in both groups (96 minutes and 98 minutes, respectively; P = 0.761), and mean blood loss was 76 mL and 66 mL in the 2 groups, respectively (P = 0.491). Clinical outcomes using Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scores neck and arm scores showed significant improvement after surgery and were similar between groups at all time points. Revision surgery occurred in 2 of 126 primary patients, and in 2 of 26 patients in the adjacent-to-fusion group., Conclusion: Although the level adjacent to a prior cervical fusion is subject to increased biomechanical forces, potentially leading to a higher risk of failure, the PCM disc was well tolerated in the short term. The early clinical results of disc replacement adjacent to a prior fusion are good and comparable to the outcomes after primary disc replacement surgery. However, in view of the small study population and short-term follow-up, continued study is mandatory.

Object: Arthrodesis is the gold standard for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Solid fusion, however, can cause stress and increased motion in the segments adjacent to the fused level. This may initiate and/or accelerate the adjacent-segment disease process. Artificial discs are designed to restore and maintain normal motion of the lumbar intervertebral segment. Restoring and maintaining normal motion of the segment reduces stresses and loads on adjacent level segments. A US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemptions multicentered study of the Charité artificial disc was completed. The control group consisted of individuals who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion involving BAK cages and iliac crest bone graft. This is the first report of Class I data in which a lumbar artificial disc is compared with lumbar fusion., Methods: Of 304 individuals enrolled in the study, 205 were randomized to the Charité disc-treated group and 99 to the BAK fusion-treated (control) group. Neurological status was equivalent between the two groups at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The number of patients with major, minor, or other neurological complications was equivalent. There was a greater incidence of both major and minor complications in the BAK fusion group at 0 to 42 days postoperatively. Compared with data reported in the lumbar fusion literature, the Charité disc-treated patients had equivalent or better mean changes in visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores., Conclusions: The Charité artificial disc is safe and effective for the treatment of single-level lumbar DDD, resulting in no higher incidence of neurological complications compared with BAK-assisted fusion and leading to equivalent or better outcomes compared with those obtained in the control group and those reported in the lumbar fusion literature.

Study Design: Prospectively collected data from regular clinical follow-up evaluations were tabulated, analyzed, reviewed using a patient self-reported questionnaire., Objective: To develop a classification system and present the long-term functional outcome of video-assisted thorascopic surgery for refractory thoracic disc disease., Summary of Background Data: Recent studies have found an 11.1% to 14.5% prevalence of thoracic disc herniations. Surgical approaches have included laminectomy, pediculectomy, costotransversectomy, lateral extracavitary, transverse arthropediculectomy, transthoracic-transpleural thoracotomy, and thoracoscopy. Recent reports have documented encouraging early results with video-assisted thorascopic surgery for thoracic disc herniations. Comparisons between thoracoscopy and open thoracotomy have demonstrated improvement in postoperative pain and morbidity with the use of endoscopic techniques., Methods: This study included 100 consecutive patients (45 women and 55 men) with an average follow-up evaluation of 4 years (range, 2-6 years). The average age of the patients was 42 years (range, 22-76 years). The average duration of symptoms was 26 months (range, 6-96 months), and 18 patients had undergone prior spine surgery. Patients were graded as follows according to the presenting symptoms (Table 1): Grade 1 (pure axial; n = 28), Grade 2 (pure radicular; n = 5), Grade 3A (axial and thoracic radicular; n = 38), Grade 3B (axial with lower leg pain; n = 19), Grade 4 (myelopathic; n = 8), or Grade 5 (paralytic = 2)., Results: A total of 117 discs were excised in 100 patients. Of the 40 patients who underwent fusion, 27 had autologous rib struts and 13 had threaded fusion. The mean operative time was 173 minutes, blood loss 259 mL, average ICU stay less than 1 day, and average hospital stay 4 days. Minor complications occurred in 21 patients, all of which resolved with no untoward effect. No patient's neurologic status worsened. Four patients underwent a secondary fusion, and a pseudarthrosis developed in one patient. Clinical success was defined objectively as an improvement in Oswestry score of 20% or more at 2 years and at final follow-up assessment, as compared with the preoperative Oswestry score. Overall, objective clinical success was observed at 2 years in 73% of the patients, and at final follow-up assessment in 70% of patients. The average percentage of improvement in Oswestry scores was most marked in Grade 4 patients (myelopathy; 60%), followed by Grade 3A patients (axial and thoracic radicular pain; 37%), Grade 3B patients (axial with leg pain; 28%), and Grade 1 patients (pure axial; 24%). The Oswestry disability score (Table 2) and back pain visual analog score (Table 3) also were significantly improved (P < 0.05) at 2 years and at final follow-up assessment in these patients. In the Grade 2 patients, those pure thoracic radicular pain, Oswestry scores initially improved significantly up to 1 year (P < 0.05). At 2 years, no significant improvement could be shown, and four of the five Grade 2 patients reported increased axial pain as their main symptom at the final follow-up assessment. Significant improvement also was seen in patients with no prior spine surgery and patients with preoperative Oswestry disability scores greater than 50. Of the 68 patients who responded to the final questionnaire, 12 rated the procedure as excellent, 37 as good, 11 as fair, and 8 as poor. Also, 57 (83.8%) of these 68 patients were satisfied and indicated they would recommend the surgery. Of the 36 patients at the final follow up assessment who had severe disability, 34 (94%) were satisfied, as compared with 23 of the 32 patients (72%) who had presented with milder disability., Conclusions: The clinical classification system helps in differentiating different presentations of thoracic disc disease and their final outcome. Video-assisted thorascopic surgery appears to be a safe and efficacious method for the treatment of refractory symptomatic thoracic disc herniations. The current data suggest that the procedure has an acceptable long-term outcome, with an 84% overall subjective patient satisfaction rate, and with objective long-term clinical success achieved in 70% of patients.

The thorascopic approach for the microsurgical removal of herniated thoracic discs is described, and perioperative management is also discussed. The microsurgical techniques used for decompression of the spinal canal in the thoracic spine are presented in detail. The diagnostic imaging, surgical positioning, approach, port placement, localization of the thoracic level, exposure of the surgical field, excision of the rib head, exposure with removal of the herniated disc, and postoperative management are outlined. Surgical and operative "pearls" in thoracoscopic spinal surgery for removing herniated thoracic discs when possible are described and illustrated.

Object: In this review the authors address the surgical strategies required to resect residual herniated thoracic discs., Methods: Data obtained in 15 patients who had undergone prior thoracic discectomy and who harbored residual or incompletely excised symptomatic thoracic discs were reviewed retrospectively. The surgical procedures that had failed to excise the herniated discs completely included 11 posterolateral approaches, one thoracotomy, and three thoracoscopy-guided surgical procedures. Of the lesions that were incompletely resected or residual, there were 13 central calcified, two soft. 12 extradural, and three intradural discs. Indications for reoperation were often multiple in each patient and included misidentification of the level of disc disease at the initial operation (five cases), abandoning the procedure because of intraoperative spinal cord injury (three cases), inadequate visualization of the pathological entity (eight cases), migration of a soft disc fragment within the spinal canal (one case), and intradural disc extension (three cases). The symptoms at the time of reoperation included myelopathy in 13 patients and radicular pain in two patients. The mean interval before reoperation was 150 days (range 1 day-4 years). The reoperation procedures included one thoracotomy and 14 video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures performed ipsilateral (11 cases) or contralateral (four cases) to the site of the initial surgery. The herniated disc material was excised completely in all 15 cases without causing new neurological deficits. Reoperation complications included atelectasis in three patients, intercostal neuralgia in two, a loosened screw that required removal in one, residual intradural disc herniation that required a second reoperation in one patient, and a cerebrospinal fluid leak in one patient. Of the 13 patients who experienced myelopathy prior to operation, 10 recovered neurological function and three stabilized. All patients with radicular pain improved., Conclusions: Calcified, large, broad-based, centrally located, or transdural thoracic disc herniations can be difficult to resect. These lesions require a ventral operative approach to visualize the dura adequately for a safe and complete resection.