Search

A significant fraction of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) is associated with chromatin, shown to regulate gene expression and to organize nuclear architecture. Mechanisms of direct and indirect RNA-chromatin interactions have been described, including the sequence-specific formation of triple helix structures. Triplexes are formed by the sequence-specific binding of RNA to the bases located in the major groove of DNA. We recently showed that triplexes do exist in the context of cellular chromatin and that these structures are stabilized by the histone H3 tail of adjacent nucleosomes. The in vitro characterization of the specificity and binding affinity of triplex sequences next to nucleosomes are essential parameters to identify potential sites of RNA-chromatin interaction in vivo. Here we provide a detailed protocol to determine the influence of nucleosome positioning on triple helix formation. This assay allows the comparative quantification of triplex formation and specificity for triplex targeting sequences relative to the spatial nucleosome position.

Chromatin-associated non-coding RNAs modulate the epigenetic landscape and its associated gene expression program. The formation of triple helices is one mechanism of sequence-specific targeting of RNA to chromatin. With this study, we show an important role of the nucleosome and its relative positioning to the triplex targeting site (TTS) in stabilizing RNA-DNA triplexes in vitro and in vivo. Triplex stabilization depends on the histone H3 tail and the location of the TTS close to the nucleosomal DNA entry-exit site. Genome-wide analysis of TTS-nucleosome arrangements revealed a defined chromatin organization with an enrichment of arrangements that allow triplex formation at active regulatory sites and accessible chromatin. We further developed a method to monitor nucleosome-RNA triplexes in vivo (TRIP-seq), revealing RNA binding to TTS sites adjacent to nucleosomes. Our data strongly support an activating role for RNA triplex-nucleosome complexes, pinpointing triplex-mediated epigenetic regulation in vivo., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Triplexes are noncanonical DNA structures, which are functionally associated with regulation of gene expression through ncRNA targeting to chromatin. Based on the rules of Hoogsteen base-pairing, polypurine sequences of a duplex can potentially form triplex structures with single-stranded oligonucleotides. Prediction of triplex-forming sequences by bioinformatics analyses have revealed enrichment of potential triplex targeting sites (TTS) at regulatory elements, mainly in promoters and enhancers, suggesting a potential function of RNA-DNA triplexes in transcriptional regulation. Here, we have quantitatively evaluated the potential of different sequences of human and mouse ribosomal RNA genes ( rDNA ) to form triplexes at different salt and pH conditions. We show by biochemical and biophysical approaches that some of these predicted sequences form triplexes with high affinity, following the canonical rules for triplex formation. We further show that RNA triplex-forming oligos (TFOs) are more stable than their DNA counterpart, and point mutations strongly affect triplex formation. We further show differential sequence requirements of pyrimidine and purine TFO sequences for efficient binding, depending on the G-C content of the TTS. The unexpected sequence specificity, revealing distinct sequence requirements for purine and pyrimidine TFOs, shows that in addition to the Hoogsteen pairing rules, a sequence code and mutations have to be taken into account to predict genomic TTS., (© 2018 Maldonado et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.)

Chromatin-remodeling complexes can translocate nucleosomes along the DNA in an ATP-coupled reaction. This process is an important regulator of all DNA-dependent processes because it determines whether certain DNA sequences are found in regions between nucleosomes with increased accessibility for other factors or wrapped around the histone octamer complex. In a comparison of seven different chromatin-remodeling machines (ACF, ISWI, Snf2H, Chd1, Mi-2, Brg1, and NURF), it is demonstrated that these complexes can read out DNA sequence features to establish specific nucleosome-positioning patterns. For one of the remodelers, ACF, we identified a 40-bp DNA sequence element that directs nucleosome positioning. Furthermore, we show that nucleosome positioning by the remodelers ACF and Chd1 is determined by a reduced affinity to the end product of the translocation reaction. The results suggest that the linkage of differential remodeling activities with the intrinsic binding preferences of nucleosomes can result in establishing distinct chromatin structures that depend on the DNA sequence and define the DNA accessibility for other protein factors.

The ATPase ISWI is the molecular motor of several nucleosome remodeling complexes including ACF. We analyzed the ACF-nucleosome interactions and determined the characteristics of ACF-dependent nucleosome remodeling. In contrast to ISWI, ACF interacts symmetrically with DNA entry sites of the nucleosome. Two-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy measurements show that ACF can bind four DNA duplexes simultaneously in a complex that contains two Acf1 and ISWI molecules. Using bead-bound nucleosomal substrates, nucleosome movement by mechanisms involving DNA twisting was excluded. Furthermore, an ACF-dependent local detachment of DNA from the nucleosome was demonstrated in a novel assay based on the preferred intercalation of ethidium bromide to free DNA. The findings suggest a loop recapture mechanism in which ACF introduces a DNA loop at the nucleosomal entry site that propagates over the histone octamer surface and leads to nucleosome repositioning.

Nucleosome remodelling complexes CHRAC and ACF contribute to chromatin dynamics by converting chemical energy into sliding of histone octamers on DNA. Their shared ATPase subunit ISWI binds DNA at the sites of entry into the nucleosome. A prevalent model assumes that DNA distortions catalysed by ISWI are converted into relocation of DNA relative to a histone octamer. HMGB1, one of the most abundant nuclear non-histone proteins, binds with preference to distorted DNA. We have now found that transient interaction of HMGB1 with nucleosomal linker DNA overlapping ISWI-binding sites enhances the ability of ACF to bind nucleosomal DNA and accelerates the sliding activity of limiting concentrations of remodelling factor. By contrast, an HMGB1 mutant with increased binding affinity was inhibitory. These observations are consistent with a role for HMGB1 as a DNA chaperone facilitating the rate-limiting DNA distortion during nucleosome remodelling.

The packaging and organization of genomic DNA into chromatin represents an additional regulatory layer of gene expression, with specific nucleosome positions that restrict the accessibility of regulatory DNA elements. The mechanisms that position nucleosomes in vivo are thought to depend on the biophysical properties of the histones, sequence patterns, like phased di-nucleotide repeats and the architecture of the histone octamer that folds DNA in 1.65 tight turns. Comparative studies of human and P. falciparum histones reveal that the latter have a strongly reduced ability to recognize internal sequence dependent nucleosome positioning signals. In contrast, the nucleosomes are positioned by AT-repeat sequences flanking nucleosomes in vivo and in vitro. Further, the strong sequence variations in the plasmodium histones, compared to other mammalian histones, do not present adaptations to its AT-rich genome. Human and parasite histones bind with higher affinity to GC-rich DNA and with lower affinity to AT-rich DNA. However, the plasmodium nucleosomes are overall less stable, with increased temperature induced mobility, decreased salt stability of the histones H2A and H2B and considerable reduced binding affinity to GC-rich DNA, as compared with the human nucleosomes. In addition, we show that plasmodium histone octamers form the shortest known nucleosome repeat length (155bp) in vitro and in vivo. Our data suggest that the biochemical properties of the parasite histones are distinct from the typical characteristics of other eukaryotic histones and these properties reflect the increased accessibility of the P. falciparum genome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Chromatin remodeling complexes are ATP-driven molecular machines that change chromatin structure by translocating nucleosomes along the DNA, evicting nucleosomes, or changing the nucleosomal histone composition. They are highly abundant in the cell and numerous different complexes exist that display distinct activity patterns. Here we review chromatin-associated signals that are recognized by remodelers. It is discussed how these regulate the remodeling reaction via changing the nucleosome substrate/product binding affinity or the catalytic translocation rate. Finally, we address the question of how chromatin remodelers operate in the cell nucleus to find specifically marked nucleosome substrates via a diffusion driven target location mechanism, and estimate the search times of this process. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled:Snf2/Swi2 ATPase structure and function. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The nucleolus is the largest compartment of the cell nucleus and is where ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are synthesized, processed and assembled with ribosomal proteins. In addition to rRNA gene clusters that build the core of this subnuclear structure, nucleoli are associated with condensed chromatin. Although the higher order structures of rRNA genes and nucleolus-associated chromatin have been studied for decades, detailed molecular insights into the constituents and organization of the nucleolar genome are only beginning to emerge. Here, we summarize current views on the structural organization of nucleolar DNA and on the targeting and anchoring of chromatin domains to this subnuclear compartment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The coregulated PHO5 and PHO8 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae provide typical examples for the role of chromatin in promoter regulation. It has been a long-standing question why the cofactors Snf2 and Gen5 are essential for full induction of PHO8 but dispensable for opening of the PHO5 promoter. We show that this discrepancy may result from different stabilities of the two promoter chromatin structures. To test this hypothesis, we used our recently established yeast extract in vitro chromatin assembly system, which generates the characteristic PHO5 promoter chromatin. Here we show that this system also assembles the native PHO8 promoter nucleosome pattern. Remarkably, the positioning information for both native patterns is specific to the yeast extract. Salt gradient dialysis or Drosophila embryo extract does not support proper nucleosome positioning unless supplemented with yeast extract. By competitive assemblies in the yeast extract system we show that the PHO8 promoter has greater nucleosome positioning power and that the properly positioned nucleosomes are more stable than those at the PHO5 promoter. Thus we provide evidence for the correlation of inherently more stable chromatin with stricter cofactor requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The term ‘nucleosome remodeling’ subsumes a large number of energy-dependent alterations of canonical nucleosome structure, catalyzed by dedicated ATPases in large multiprotein complexes. The importance of these factors for gene regulation and other processes with chromatin substrate have emerged from genetic studies. Mechanistic analyses of nucleosome remodeling by different enzymes provided a diverse, almost confusing phenomenology of ATP-dependent derangement of nucleosomes in vitro, suggesting that different remodeling machines follow different strategies to disrupt histone–DNA interactions. This review explores the alternative possibility that the rich phenomenology of nucleosome remodeling may be brought about by variations of one basic remodeling reaction. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The rRNA gene cluster consists of multiple transcription units. Half of these are active, while the other half are transcriptionally inactive. Previously, in vivo studies have demonstrated that silencing of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is mediated by the chromatin remodeling NoRC (nucleolar remodeling complex). To explore the mechanisms underlying NoRC-directed silencing of rDNA transcription, we investigated the effect of recombinant NoRC on RNA polymerase I transcription on reconstituted chromatin templates. We show that NoRC interacts with the transcription terminator factor (TTF-I), and this interaction is required both for the binding of TTF-I to its promoter-proximal target site and for the recruitment of NoRC to the promoter. After association with the rDNA promoter, NoRC alters the position of the promoter-bound nucleosome, thereby repressing RNA polymerase I transcription. This NoRC-directed rDNA repression requires the N terminus of histone H4. Repression is effective before preinitiation complex formation and as such is unable to exert an effect upon activated rDNA genes. Furthermore, the early steps of rDNA repression do not depend on DNA and histone modifications. These results reveal an important role for TFF-I in recruiting NoRC to rDNA and an active role for NoRC in the establishment of rDNA silencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

DNA packaged into chromatin is the physiologically relevant substrate for all DNA-dependent processes inside the nuclei of eukaryotic cells. The highly compacted structures of DNA and histones is inherently repressive for all DNA-dependent processes. Active mechanisms exist to generate dynamic chromatin, which maintains two apparently contradictory functions: tight compaction and free accessibility of DNA. The dynamics of chromatin higher order folding and the influence of chromatin structure on transcription will be described in this paper. Chromatin dynamics and higher order folding may be the key regulators of not only transcription but of all DNA-dependent processes in the nucleus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drosophila Mi-2 (dMi-2) is the ATPase subunit of a complex combining ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling and histone deacetylase activities. dMi-2 contains an HMG box-like region, two PHD fingers, two chromodomains and a SNF2-type ATPase domain. It is not known which of these domains contribute to nucleosome remodelling. We have tested a panel of dMi-2 deletion mutants in ATPase, nucleosome mobilization and nucleosome binding assays. Deletion of the chromodomains impairs all three activities. A dMi-2 mutant lacking the chromodomains is incorporated into a functional histone deacetylase complex in vivo but has lost nucleosome-stimulated ATPase activity. In contrast to dHP1, dMi-2 does not bind methylated histone H3 tails and does not require histone tails for nucleosome binding. Instead, the dMi-2 chromodomains display DNA binding activity that is not shared by other chromodomains. Our results suggest that the chromodomains act at an early step of the remodelling process to bind the nucleosome substrate predominantly via protein-DNA interactions. Furthermore, we identify DNA binding as a novel chromodomain-associated activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

NEQ288, one of two archaeal histones in Nanoarchaeum equitans, has a unique four-residue insertion that closely resembles an insertion in the eukaryotic histone H3 lineage. NEQ288 bound DNA but did not compact DNA in vitro in the absence of NEQ348, the second N. equitans archaeal histone. The properties of NEQ288 suggest an intermediate between the archaeal and H3 histone lineages and an evolutionary step toward the now-mandatory assembly of eukaryotic histones into heterodimer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a highly efficient enzyme specialized in synthesizing most ribosomal RNAs. After nucleosome deposition at each round of rDNA replication, the Pol I transcription machinery has to deal with nucleosomal barriers. It has been suggested that Pol I-associated factors facilitate chromatin transcription, but it is unknown whether Pol I has an intrinsic capacity to transcribe through nucleosomes. Here, we used in vitro transcription assays to study purified WT and mutant Pol I variants from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and compare their abilities to pass a nucleosomal barrier with those of yeast Pol II and Pol III. Under identical conditions, purified Pol I and Pol III, but not Pol II, could transcribe nucleosomal templates. Pol I mutants lacking either the heterodimeric subunit Rpa34.5/Rpa49 or the C-terminal part of the specific subunit Rpa12.2 showed a lower processivity on naked DNA templates, which was even more reduced in the presence of a nucleosome. Our findings suggest that the lobe-binding subunits Rpa34.5/Rpa49 and Rpa12.2 facilitate passage through nucleosomes, suggesting possible cooperation among these subunits. We discuss the contribution of Pol I-specific subunit domains to efficient Pol I passage through nucleosomes in the context of transcription rate and processivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]