Search

Background: Nowadays the microarray technology allows whole-genome analysis with a high resolution and performance for the genetic diagnosis in any patient with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder. However in the immediate future, with the development of massive sequencing systems for application at clinical diagnosis, it will be necessary to have clinical criteria to guide studies., Aim: To perform an exhaustive clinical definition of patients with pathogenic copy number variations in order to establish the clinical criteria most suggestive of this kind of genomic rearrangements., Method: We designed and implemented a database to collect 190 different clinical variables (pregnancy, neonatal, facial dysmorphism, congenital anomalies, neurological features and family history) in a series of 246 patients, with developmental delay/intellectual disability. All cases were studied with array comparative genomic hybridization., Results: We have found a pathogenic genomic imbalance in 73 patients. Frequency analysis of all clinical variables showed that growth disorder, abnormalities of hands, low-set ears and hypertelorism are the more frequent features among patients with genomic rearrangements. However other clinical features, such as genital abnormalities and aggressiveness, are more specifically associated with pathogenic copy number variations in spite of their low frequencies in the overall series, yielding higher statistical significance values than other traits., Conclusions: The genotype-phenotype comparison may be useful to set in the future the main clinical manifestations associated with deletions, duplications and unbalanced translocations. Theses analyses will improve the clinical indications and protocols to implement genomic arrays in the genetic study of patients with neurodevelopment disorders., (Copyright © 2014 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Prenatal genetic diagnosis with new high-performance technologies such as genomic array adds great complexity to the ethical dilemmas that already exist in current medicine. The main objective of this study was to carry out an analysis and bioethical reflections centred on the outcome associated with the use of the genetic array technique in 185 pregnancies at the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe (Valencia, Spain). It is an observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study during the years 2014 to 2017, inclusive. We analyse the results and the follow-up of the 185 cases in which this prenatal genetic study was carried out by array technique. Of the 185 prenatal genetic studies carried out, 165 showed no copy number variants (normal result) and in the 20 remaining pregnancies (10.81%), a dose change was detected. Abortion was carried out in 11 cases with pathological and/or probably pathological abnormalities. Of the 165 cases in which no dose variant was detected, an abortion was carried out in 49 cases, which represents 29.7%. The introduction of new genomic analysis techniques to invasive prenatal diagnosis highlights the ethical problems that arise above all in the interpretation of genetic variants detected and genetic counselling, while emphasising the need for correct informed consent and it adds, if possible, more controversy to a subject with great bioethical substance such as abortion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]