Search

Click ligation is a technology of joining DNA fragments based on azide–alkyne cycloaddition. In the most common variant, click ligation introduces a 4-methyl-1,2,3-triazole (trz) group instead of the phosphodiester bond between two adjacent nucleosides. While this linkage is believed to be biocompatible, little is known about the possibility of its recognition by DNA repair systems or its potential for DNA polymerase stalling and miscoding. Here we report that trz linkage is resistant to several human and bacterial endonucleases involved in DNA repair. At the same time, it strongly blocks some DNA polymerases (Pfu, DNA polymerase β) while allowing bypass by others (phage RB69 polymerase, Klenow fragment). All polymerases, except for DNA polymerase β, showed high frequency of misinsertion at the trz site, incorporating dAMP instead of the next complementary nucleotide. Thus, click ligation can be expected to produce a large amount of errors if used in custom gene synthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The DNA building blocks 2′-deoxynucleotides are enantiomeric, with their natural β-D-configuration dictated by the sugar moiety. Their synthetic β-L-enantiomers (βLdNs) can be used to obtain L-DNA, which, when fully substituted, is resistant to nucleases and is finding use in many biosensing and nanotechnology applications. However, much less is known about the enzymatic recognition and processing of individual βLdNs embedded in D-DNA. Here, we address the template properties of βLdNs for several DNA polymerases and the ability of base excision repair enzymes to remove these modifications from DNA. The Klenow fragment was fully blocked by βLdNs, whereas DNA polymerase κ bypassed them in an error-free manner. Phage RB69 DNA polymerase and DNA polymerase β treated βLdNs as non-instructive but the latter enzyme shifted towards error-free incorporation on a gapped DNA substrate. DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases did not process βLdNs. DNA glycosylases sensitive to the base opposite their cognate lesions also did not recognize βLdNs as a correct pairing partner. Nevertheless, when placed in a reporter plasmid, pyrimidine βLdNs were resistant to repair in human cells, whereas purine βLdNs appear to be partly repaired. Overall, βLdNs are unique modifications that are mostly non-instructive but have dual non-instructive/instructive properties in special cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The DNA building blocks 2′-deoxynucleotides are enantiomeric, with their natural β-D-configuration dictated by the sugar moiety. Their synthetic β-L-enantiomers (βLdNs) can be used to obtain L-DNA, which, when fully substituted, is resistant to nucleases and is finding use in many biosensing and nanotechnology applications. However, much less is known about the enzymatic recognition and processing of individual βLdNs embedded in D-DNA. Here, we address the template properties of βLdNs for several DNA polymerases and the ability of base excision repair enzymes to remove these modifications from DNA. The Klenow fragment was fully blocked by βLdNs, whereas DNA polymerase κ bypassed them in an error-free manner. Phage RB69 DNA polymerase and DNA polymerase β treated βLdNs as non-instructive but the latter enzyme shifted towards error-free incorporation on a gapped DNA substrate. DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases did not process βLdNs. DNA glycosylases sensitive to the base opposite their cognate lesions also did not recognize βLdNs as a correct pairing partner. Nevertheless, when placed in a reporter plasmid, pyrimidine βLdNs were resistant to repair in human cells, whereas purine βLdNs appear to be partly repaired. Overall, βLdNs are unique modifications that are mostly non-instructive but have dual non-instructive/instructive properties in special cases.

Azide–alkyne cycloaddition ("click chemistry") has found wide use in the analysis of molecular interactions in living cells. 5-ethynyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-3-ol (EAP) is a recently developed apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site analog functionalized with an ethynyl moiety, which can be introduced into cells in DNA constructs to perform labeling or cross-linking in situ. However, as a non-natural nucleoside, EAP could be subject to removal by DNA repair and misreading by DNA polymerases. Here, we investigate the interaction of this clickable AP site analog with DNA polymerases and base excision repair enzymes. Similarly to the natural AP site, EAP was non-instructive and followed the "A-rule", directing residual but easily detectable incorporation of dAMP by E. coli DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment, bacteriophage RB69 DNA polymerase and human DNA polymerase β. On the contrary, EAP was blocking for DNA polymerases κ and λ. EAP was an excellent substrate for the major human AP endonuclease APEX1 and E. coli AP exonucleases Xth and Nfo but was resistant to the AP lyase activity of DNA glycosylases. Overall, our data indicate that EAP, once within a cell, would represent a replication block and would be removed through an AP endonuclease-initiated long-patch base excision repair pathway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]