Search

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TEA transcription factor Tec1 controls several developmental programs in response to nutrients and pheromones. Tec1 is targeted by the pheromone-responsive Fus3/Kss1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, which destabilizes the transcription factor to ensure efficient mating of sexual partner cells. The regulation of Tec1 by signaling pathways that control cell division and development in response to nutrients, however, is not known. Here, we show that Tec1 protein stability is under control of the nutrient-sensitive target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) signaling pathway via the Tip41-Tap42-Sit4 branch. We further show that degradation of Tec1 upon inhibition of TORC1 by rapamycin does not involve polyubiquitylation and appears to be proteasome independent. However, rapamycin-induced Tec1 degradation depends on the HECT ubiquitin ligase Rsp5, which physically interacts with Tec1 via conserved PxY motives. We further demonstrate that rapamycin and mating pheromone control Tec1 protein stability through distinct mechanisms by targeting different domains of the transcription factor. Finally, we show that Tec1 is a positive regulator of yeast chronological lifespan (CLS), a known TORC1-regulated process. Our findings indicate that in yeast, Tec1 links TORC1 and MAPK signaling pathways to coordinate control of cellular development in response to different stimuli.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TEA transcription factor Tec1 is known to regulate target genes together with a second transcription factor, Ste12. Tec1-Ste12 complexes can activate transcription through Tec1 binding sites (TCSs), which can be further combined with Ste12 binding sites (PREs) for cooperative DNA binding. However, previous studies have hinted that Tec1 might regulate transcription also without Ste12. Here, we show that in vivo, physiological amounts of Tec1 are sufficient to stimulate TCS-mediated gene expression and transcription of the FLO11 gene in the absence of Ste12. In vitro, Tec1 is able to bind TCS elements with high affinity and specificity without Ste12. Furthermore, Tec1 contains a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain that confers Ste12-independent activation of TCS-regulated gene expression. On a genome-wide scale, we identified 302 Tec1 target genes that constitute two distinct classes. A first class of 254 genes is regulated by Tec1 in a Ste12-dependent manner and is enriched for genes that are bound by Tec1 and Ste12 in vivo. In contrast, a second class of 48 genes can be regulated by Tec1 independently of Ste12 and is enriched for genes that are bound by the stress transcription factors Yap6, Nrg1, Cin5, Skn7, Hsf1, and Msn4. Finally, we find that combinatorial control by Tec1-Ste12 complexes stabilizes Tec1 against degradation. Our study suggests that Tec1 is able to regulate TCS-mediated gene expression by Ste12-dependent and Ste12-independent mechanisms that enable promoter-specific transcriptional control.

We previously reported the occurrence of novel dinucleotide mutations of the K-RAS gene (KRAS2) in 2% of pancreatic tumors sampled, but it remained unknown whether these were functional mutations that convert the proto-oncogene to an oncogene, or unselected mutations that might inactivate protein function. In the current study, the functionality of these rare mutations was quantitated via a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway-specific transactivational reporter system. Pathway activation by dinucleotide mutant proteins was comparable to that of the common G12V mutant K-Ras protein. Current allele-specific technologies often employed to detect K-RAS mutations in clinical tumor samples produce false results when dinucleotide mutations are present. Therefore, it is advisable to consider dinucleotide KRAS2 mutants in the strategic design of mutational screens used to assay clinical tumor samples. Hum Mutat 18:357, 2001., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) is thought to be a precursor lesion of infiltrating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (IPA). DPC4 is a tumor-suppressor gene on chromosome 18q21.1 and is inactivated in approximately 55% of IPAs. Recently, immunohistochemical labeling using a monoclonal antibody to the Dpc4 protein has been shown to mirror DPC4 genetic status in invasive adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. In the present study, we examined the role of Dpc4 loss in neoplastic progression and recurrence. Two cases in which a PanIN clinically progressed to an invasive adenocarcinoma and a third of a patient with IPA of the head of the pancreas who later developed invasive adenocarcinoma in the tail of the pancreas were studied using Dpc4 immunolabeling. The first patient underwent pancreatic resection, which revealed PanIN-3 that lacked Dpc4 expression, and the patient developed an invasive pancreatic ductal carcinoma 10 years later that shared this loss of expression. The second patient had a pancreaticoduodenectomy for recurrent pancreatitis, and the resected pancreas contained PanIN-3 with intact Dpc4 expression. Seventeen months later, the patient developed an invasive adenocarcinoma of the distal pancreas that also had intact Dpc4 expression. In the third case, the patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for an invasive ductal adenocarcinoma with negative margins. This carcinoma lacked Dpc4 expression. Three years later, resection of the pancreatic tail showed a second invasive adenocarcinoma. The cancer in the tail of the gland showed intact Dpc4 expression, suggesting it represented a second primary tumor, not a recurrence. We conclude that Dpc4 expression in PanIN can be predictive of Dpc4 expression in the subsequent invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. Additionally, Dpc4 expression can be used to differentiate recurrent or persistent adenocarcinoma from a second primary adenocarcinoma., (Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.)

Objective: To screen a library of small chemicals for compounds that activate the DPC4 signal transduction pathway in a human pancreatic cancer cell line., Summary Background Data: Various tumor-suppressor genes are mutated in all human cancers. Specifically, DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic carcinoma, locus 4 or MADH4/SMAD4) is a tumor-suppressor gene mutated in approximately 50% of human pancreatic adenocarcinomas. DPC4 plays an important role in the well-studied transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) signaling pathway. It would be useful to identify therapies that augment or restore the downstream functions of this critical signal transduction pathway, in hopes that such therapy would have a rational role in anticancer therapy., Methods: Using a commercially available plasmid vector with a luciferase reporter gene already incorporated, a DPC4-specific reporter construct was genetically engineered. This was done by inserting six copies of the palindromic Smad binding element (6SBE), which is a DNA binding element specific for DPC4, in front of the minimal promoter in the plasmid. This construct was then stably integrated into the genome of a human pancreatic cancer cell line (PANC-1) that has wild-type DPC4. Several stably transfected clones were tested for basal luciferase expression and inducibility with TGFbeta, which is known to activate the DPC4 signal transduction pathway. A single transfected clone was chosen for the drug screen based on basal luciferase (reporter) expression and TGFbeta inducibility. A systematic screen of the chemical library was then performed, using luciferase activity to detect DPC4 activity and induction of the signaling pathway., Results: A high-throughput system based on this stably integrated reporter system was used to screen a library of 16,320 random compounds to identify agents that conferred robust augmentation of the DPC4 signal transduction pathway. Of the 16,320 compounds screened, 11 were associated with a 2- to 5-fold induction of luciferase activity, and one with a 12-fold activation. The latter compound was shown to be a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor and was further characterized., Conclusions: These results confirm the feasibility of a specific high-throughput reporter system to screen a large compound library in human cells efficiently. The screening identified several compounds capable of augmenting DPC4-specific luciferase reporter activity, and a specific mechanism for one compound was identified. The discovery of such agents will aid our understanding of complex tumor-suppressive signaling pathways and may identify other potential therapeutic targets within this critical signaling pathway. In addition, random drug screening provides an unbiased method for identifying drugs or lead compounds for potential therapeutic use.

Background: Biliary tract carcinomas are clinically heterogeneous. It is not known if molecular heterogeneity underlies the clinical differences., Methods: The authors evaluated 128 bile duct carcinomas, 88 of the distal common bile duct and 40 of more proximal origin (28 perihilar carcinomas, 12 intrahepatic carcinomas), immunohistochemically for abnormalities in the expression of the products of the DPC4 and p53 tumor-suppressor genes. Prognostic factors were evaluated in the series of distal bile duct carcinomas for which follow-up information was available., Results: The authors found that a significantly higher percentage of distal bile duct carcinomas (55%) demonstrated loss of DPC4 expression than did the proximal bile duct carcinomas (15%; P < 0.001). They also found that a significantly higher percentage of the distal tumors abnormally expressed the p53 gene product (51% vs. 26%; P < 0.001). Among the distal common bile duct carcinomas, the presence of poorly differentiated histology correlated with decreased survival in multivariate analysis, while labeling for p53 or Dpc4, margin status, lymph node status, and tumor dimension did not correlate significantly with survival., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that abnormalities in DPC4 and p53 gene expression are frequent in distal common bile duct carcinomas, just as they are in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, suggesting that these two tumor types might share a similar molecular pathogenesis. They also show that proximal and distal bile duct carcinomas have different patterns of inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes, indicating that they often arise through different molecular mechanisms likely reflecting their differing etiologies., (Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.)

The tumor-suppressor protein Dpc4 (Smad4, Madh4) regulates gene expression. On binding of an extracellular ligand of the extensive transforming growth factor (TGF) superfamily to its cognate receptor complex, latent cytoplasmic Dpc4 is activated and translocated into the nucleus to function as part of various DNA-binding transcriptional activator complexes. The most relevant ligand/receptor pair to control the tumor suppressive function of Dpc4 remains uncertain, but is usually assumed to be TGF-beta and its heteromeric receptor. We exploited a fortuitous experiment of nature to directly test this hypothesis: the TGF-beta type II receptor gene is inactivated by mutation in nearly all colorectal carcinomas having microsatellite instability, as seen in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and in sporadic medullary colorectal cancers. Using a specific and sensitive immunohistochemical label for Dpc4, we examined nuclear localization of Dpc4 in 13 HNPCC, six medullary, and 41 sporadic nonmedullary colorectal carcinomas. In agreement with published rates, two (5%) of 41 sporadic tumors showed complete loss of Dpc4 protein, indicative of genetic inactivation. All 13 HNPCC and six medullary tumors had intact cytoplasmic and nuclear Dpc4 localization. The TGFBR2 gene was sequenced in three of the cancers from patients with HNPCC, and all of these harbored inactivating mutations. The specificity of the immunohistochemical assay was demonstrated in xenograft tumors of syngeneic cell lines that differed in DPC4 genetic status because of an engineered gene knockout. Thus, nuclear localization of Dpc4 can be maintained in cells with inactivated TGF-beta type II receptors, suggesting the persistence of tumor-suppressive action of an upstream signaling input, most likely a ligand/receptor complex distinct from TGF-beta. Identification of the relevant input would be expected to have implications for the understanding of tumorigenesis and the design of rational biological therapy.

DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) is a nuclear transcription factor shown to be genetically inactivated in over half of infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Immunohistochemical labeling for the DPC4 gene product using a monoclonal antibody has recently been shown to be an extremely sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene alterations in pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) are a biologically less aggressive subtype of pancreatic neoplasm that may show benign, borderline, or overtly malignant features. However, the role of DPC4 inactivation in the development of MCNs has not been examined. The immunohistochemical expression of Dpc4 protein was therefore examined in 36 mucinous cystic neoplasms using this previously characterized monoclonal antibody. The 36 mucinous cystic neoplasms studied included 23 adenomas, 1 tumor with borderline potential, 5 tumors with carcinoma in situ, and 7 invasive carcinomas. Twenty-nine (100%) of the 29 noninvasive mucinous cystic neoplasms strongly expressed Dpc4 in the neoplastic epithelium. In striking contrast, only one (14%) of seven infiltrating carcinomas expressed Dpc4 in the neoplastic epithelium (p = 0.0001). The adjacent stroma retained expression of this protein in all 36 cases. In invasive MCNs with loss of Dpc4 expression, areas of carcinoma in situ were identified in the same paraffin sections, and these areas of carcinoma in situ retained expression of Dpc4. The frequent loss of Dpc4 expression in invasive MCNs indicates that genetic inactivation of Dpc4 occurs late in the neoplastic progression of these tumors and suggests a relationship to the development of invasion.

DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) encodes a nuclear transcription factor shown to be genetically inactivated in over one-half of conventional infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas have been suggested to be distinct neoplasms with a significantly less aggressive course than conventional ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, but molecular comparisons of these tumor types have previously been impaired by technical difficulties. Recently, immunohistochemical labeling for the DPC4 gene product has been shown to be an extremely sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene alterations in pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Therefore, we analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of Dpc4 protein in 79 IPMNs using a previously characterized monoclonal antibody. Twenty-nine of the IPMNs also had an associated infiltrating adenocarcinoma available for analysis. The labeling patterns observed were compared to those we have previously reported for conventional ductal carcinomas. All 79 of the intraductal components of the IPMNs strongly expressed Dpc4 protein. In 77 of the 79 cases (97%), the labeling was diffusely positive, and in 2 of the 79 (3%) the labeling was focally positive. Dpc4 expression was seen in 28 (97%) of the associated 29 invasive cancers. The one infiltrating carcinoma that showed loss of Dpc4 expression was associated with an intraductal component which showed focal loss of Dpc4 expression. The strong and almost universal expression of Dpc4 in IPMNs contrasts sharply with the loss of Dpc4 expression seen in approximately 30% of in situ adenocarcinomas of the pancreas (so-called pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms, grade 3; P: < 0.001) and in 55% of pancreatic duct carcinomas (P: < 0.0001). Differences in Dpc4 expression between IPMNs and ductal carcinomas suggest a fundamental genetic difference in tumorigenesis, which may relate to the significantly better clinical outcomes observed for IPMNs.

The transcription factor Smad4 binds DNA in response to a TGF-beta ligand-initiated intracellular signaling cascade. SMAD4 is deleted or mutated during tumorigenesis in many human tumors. Some of these mutations occur in the N-terminal portion of the protein, the Mad homology 1 (MH1) region, which exhibits sequence-specific DNA-binding. We used alanine scanning mutagenesis and natural mutations to map the subregion of the MH1 domain necessary for that function. We created 20 individual mutations in the MH1 region of human Smad4 and assayed their effect on DNA-binding in vitro. Mutation of residues in the less conserved N- and C-terminal areas of the MH1 region had no effect on DNA-binding. However, mutations in the domain from L43 to R135 caused a dramatic reduction of the ability of Smad4 to bind DNA. Previous work demonstrated a beta-hairpin protein motif within this region to be responsible for DNA-binding, but suggested that the tumorigenic mutations occurring outside this motif may target a separate function of the MH1 domain. Our results demonstrate that the MH1 domain as a whole is very sensitive to changes in overall structure, and that tumorigenic mutations within the region of L43-R135 indeed would target DNA-binding.

Medullary carcinomas of the pancreas are a recently described, histologically distinct subset of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas that may have a unique pathogenesis and clinical course. To further evaluate these neoplasms, we studied genetic, pathological, and clinical features of 13 newly identified medullary carcinomas of the pancreas. Nine (69%) of these had wild-type K-ras genes, and one had microsatellite instability (MSI). This MSI medullary carcinoma, along with three previously reported MSI medullary carcinomas, were examined immunohistochemically for Mlh1 and Msh2 expression, and all four expressed Msh2 but did not express Mlh1. In contrast, all of the medullary carcinomas without MSI expressed both Msh2 and Mlh1. Remarkably, the MSI medullary carcinoma of the pancreas in the present series arose in a patient with a synchronous but histologically distinct cecal carcinoma that also had MSI and did not express Mlh1. The synchronous occurrence of two MSI carcinomas suggests an inherited basis for the development of these carcinomas. Indeed, the medullary phenotype, irrespective of MSI, was highly associated with a family history of cancer in first-degree relatives (P < 0.001). Finally, one medullary carcinoma with lymphoepithelioma-like features contained Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA-1 by in situ hybridization. Therefore, because of medullary carcinoma's special genetic, immunohistochemical, and clinical features, recognition of the medullary variant of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is important. Only by classifying medullary carcinoma as special subset of adenocarcinoma can we hope to further elucidate its unique pathogenesis.

Infiltrating adenocarcinomas of the pancreas are believed to arise from histologically identifiable intraductal precursors [pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs)] that undergo a series of architectural, cytological, and genetic changes. The role of DPC4 tumor suppressor gene inactivation in this progression has not been defined. Immunohistochemistry for the Dpc4 protein in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is a sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene status, providing a tool to examine DPC4 status in these putative precursor lesions. A total of 188 PanINs were identified in 40 pancreata, 38 (95%) of which also contained an infiltrating adenocarcinoma. Sections containing these 188 duct lesions were labeled with a monoclonal antibody to Dpc4. All 82 flat (PanIN-1A), all 54 papillary (PanIN-1B), and all 23 atypical papillary (PanIN-2) intraductal lesions expressed Dpc4. In contrast, 9 of 29 (31%) severely atypical lesions (PanIN-3 lesions, carcinomas in situ) did not. The difference in Dpc4 expression between histologically low-grade (PanIN-1 and -2) and histologically high-grade (PanIN-3) duct lesions was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In three cases, the pattern of Dpc4 expression in the PanIN-3 lesions did not match the pattern of expression in the associated infiltrating carcinomas, indicating that these high-grade lesions did not simply represent infiltrating carcinoma growing along benign ducts. Loss of Dpc4 expression occurs biologically late in the neoplastic progression that leads to the development of infiltrating pancreatic cancer, at the stage of histologically recognizable carcinoma.

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosome arm 18q is frequent in gastrointestinal cancers. Over 90% of pancreatic carcinomas have 18q LOH. Bi-allelic inactivation of the MADH4/DPC4/SMAD4 gene at 18q21.1 is seen in about half of pancreatic carcinomas with 18q LOH. In the remaining tumors with 18q LOH, MADH4 is not mutated and its expression is unaffected, and no alterations in MADH2/SMAD2, a MADH4-related gene at 18q12.3, have been found. A controversial candidate tumor-suppressor gene at 18q21.2 is DCC (deleted in colorectal carcinoma), which encodes a netrin-1 receptor component with functions in cell migration and apoptosis. Reduced or absent DCC expression has been observed in many cancers, but few somatic mutations that would clearly inactivate DCC function have been reported. We studied a panel of 115 pancreatic and 14 biliary cancers for homozygous deletions of DCC exons and flanking 18q regions. Seven homozygous deletions were seen in the region that includes the DCC gene. In two tumors, the deletions inactivate DCC but not MADH4. A physical and transcript map of the deleted regions was constructed, and DCC was the only known gene affected by all seven deletions. These data are the strongest mutational evidence presented yet in support of the hypothesis that DCC or another gene in the region distal to MADH4 is inactivated, playing a causal role in cancer development., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) is a tumor suppressor gene inactivated by allelic loss in approximately 55% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Unfortunately, it can be technically very difficult to detect the inactivation of DPC4 at the genetic level because genetic analyses require the microdissection of relatively pure samples of neoplastic and normal tissues. This is especially true for pancreatic adenocarcinomas, which elicit vigorous, non-neoplastic, stromal responses. Immunohistochemical labeling can overcome this hurdle because it preserves morphological information. We therefore studied the expression of the DPC4 gene product in 46 cancers, including 5 cancer cell lines by Western blot analysis and 41 primary periampullary adenocarcinomas by immunohistochemistry. The status of exons 1-11 of the DPC4 gene in all 46 of the cancers had been previously characterized at the molecular level, allowing us to correlate Dpc4 expression directly with gene status. Three cell lines had wild-type DPC4 genes, and Dpc4 expression was detected in all three by Western blot. The two cell lines with homozygously deleted DPC4 genes did not show Dpc4 protein by Western blot analysis. Immunohistochemical labeling revealed that 17 (94%) of the 18 primary adenocarcinomas with wild-type DPC4 genes expressed the DPC4 gene product, whereas 21 (91%) of 23 primary adenocarcinomas with inactivated DPC4 genes did not. Cases in which there was discordance between the immunohistochemical labeling and the genetic analyses were reanalyzed genetically, and we identified a deletion in exon 0 of DPC4 in one of these cases. This is the first report of a mutation in exon 0 of DPC4 in a pancreatic cancer. The contrast between the strong expression of Dpc4 by normal tissues and the loss of expression in the carcinomas was highlighted in several cases in which an infiltrating cancer was identified growing into a benign duct. These observations suggest that immunohistochemical labeling for the DPC4 gene product is an extremely sensitive and specific marker for DPC4 gene alterations in pancreatic carcinomas. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical labeling for Dpc4 in other periampullary carcinomas has yet to be determined.

DPC4/SMAD4 is a candidate tumor suppressor gene with a strikingly high frequency of gene alterations in pancreatic cancer that suggests a discrete role for DPC4 in these tumors. DPC4 tumor-suppressive function has been implicated to mediate the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta)-suppressive pathway; however, in a DPC4-null pancreatic cancer cell line, TGFbeta growth-inhibitory and transcriptional responses were found to be DPC4-independent. This was observed within native cells having a natural homozygous deletion and in clones engineered for stable expression of wild-type DPC4 integrated into the genome. This observation contrasted with the absolute DPC4 dependence of TGFbeta responses in a breast cancer cell line studied in parallel. This growth-inhibitory response to TGFbeta in DPC4-null cells relied on an intact ras effector pathway. These data further suggest a major categorization of TGFbeta responses into DPC4-dependent and -independent signaling pathways and specifically suggest that disruption of the TGFbeta-independent signal might be a basis of selection for the emergence of DPC4 alterations during tumorigenesis in the pancreas and other sites.

The tumor suppressor Smad4/Dpc4 is a transcription activator that binds specific DNA sequences and whose nuclear localization is induced after exposure to type beta transforming growth factor-like cytokines. We explored an inducible system in which Smad4 protein is activated by translocation to the nucleus when cell lines that stably express wild-type or mutant Smad4 proteins fused to a murine estrogen receptor domain are treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen. This induced Smad4-mediated transcriptional activation and a decrease in growth rate, attributable to a cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and an induction of apoptosis. A tumor-derived mutation (Arg-100 --> Thr) affecting a residue critical for DNA-binding demonstrated an "oncogenic" phenotype, having decreases in both the G1 fraction and apoptosis and, consequently, an augmentation of population growth. This model should be useful in the exploration and control of components that lie further downstream in the Smad4 tumor-suppressor pathway.

Dpc4 (Smad4) is implicated in mediation of signals from transforming growth factor (TGF) beta and related ligands, and wild-type Dpc4 mediates TGF-beta-stimulated gene transcription at specific DNA sequences bound by Dpc4 [Smad binding element (SBE)]. We characterized panels of DPC4 tumor mutations and cancer cell lines. Amino acid substitutions within the NH2-terminal third of Dpc4 weakened or ablated SBE-mediated gene regulation by a disruption of DNA binding. An interaction of the COOH-terminal end with the DNA-binding domain of Dpc4 was evident but was not required to explain the functional impairment produced by NH2-terminal DPC4 mutations. Both substitution and truncation mutations of the COOH-terminal half of DPC4 lacked the ability to regulate transcription while retaining the sequence-specific DNA-binding function, but through differing mechanisms. A modular domain to redistribute Dpc4 to the nuclear compartment allowed SBE-mediated transcriptional activation in a cell line having a TGF-1 receptor defect and was sufficient to restore SBE-mediated transactivation ability to COOH-terminal DPC4 missense mutants. Cells harboring DPC4 alterations had a universal impairment of the TGF-beta-stimulated SBE transcriptional response. These studies identify the loss of SBE-mediated gene regulation as a uniform outcome of the selection for DPC4 alterations during tumorigenesis. They raise the possibility of restoration of some Dpc4-associated transcriptional events in cancer cells through the targeted redistribution of wild-type and some missense mutant forms of Dpc4 to the nucleus.

Mounting evidence indicates that Smad proteins are required for TGF beta signaling, but the way(s) in which Smad proteins propagate this signal is unclear. We found that two human Smad proteins (Smad3 and Smad4) could specifically recognize an identical 8 bp palindromic sequences (GTCTAGAC). Tandem repeats of this palindrome conferred striking TGF beta responsiveness to a minimal promoter. This responsiveness was abrogated by targeted deletion of the cellular Smad4 gene. These results define a novel biochemical property of Smad proteins that is likely to play a direct role in the biologic responses to TGF beta and related ligands.

During tumorigenesis, positive selection is exerted upon those tumor cells that alter rate-limiting regulatory pathways. A corollary of this principle is that mutation of one gene abrogates the need for alteration of another gene in the same pathway and also that the coexistence in a single tumor of mutations in different genes implies their involvement in distinct tumor-suppressive pathways. We studied 42 pancreatic adenocarcinomas for genetic alterations in the K-ras oncogene and the p16, p53, and DPC4 tumor suppressor genes. All of them had the K-ras gene mutated. Thirty-eight % of the tumors had four altered genes, another 38% had three altered genes, 15% had two altered genes, and 8% of the tumors had one altered gene. Interestingly, we noted a high concordance of DPC4 and p16 inactivations (P = 0.007), suggesting that the genetic inactivation of p16 increases the selective advantage of subsequent mutation in DPC4. No statistically significant association was identified between the alteration of these cancer genes and pathological or clinical parameters. This type of multigenic analysis in human tumors may serve to substantiate experimental tumor models and thus increase our understanding of the truly physiologically relevant tumor-suppressive pathways that are abrogated during human tumorigenesis.

A first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer is found in 5% to 10% of patients with pancreatic carcinomas, suggesting an inherited predisposition for this neoplasm. The recently identified DPC4 tumor suppressor gene is a strong candidate for the gene responsible for the familial form of pancreatic carcinoma. DPC4 was identified in a consensus area of homozygous deletion in pancreatic carcinomas, and it is biallelically inactivated in approximately 50% of sporadic pancreatic carcinomas. The coding sequence of this gene is 1660 nucleotides in length, covering 11 exons. We describe optimized primers and conditions used in polymerase chain reaction and cycle sequencing of the entire DPC4 coding sequence of 25 individuals (eight with pancreatic carcinoma) from 11 kindreds with a familial aggregation of pancreatic carcinoma. No mutations in the coding sequences of the DPC4 gene were found; hence, it appears that germline mutations in DPC4 cannot account for many of the familial aggregations of pancreatic carcinoma.

DPC4, a recently cloned gene located on 18q2l.l, is inactivated in almost one half of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. To determine whether DPC4 inactivation is involved in esophageal adenocarcinoma, we have analyzed aneuploid populations from biopsies of 35 patients with Barrett's esophagus who had premalignant epithelium, adenocarcinoma, or both. Sixteen of 35 patients (46%) had allelic loss at l8q21.1, including 7 patients who had only premalignant tissue present in their Barrett segment. In addition, three of four patients (75%) with l8q21.1 loss in their aneuploid populations had the allelic loss present in diploid cells. Mutational analysis of DPC4 did not reveal any inactivating alterations in the gene. These data indicate that allelic losses at l8q are selected during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus, but the targeted gene remains to be identified.

Resistance to the growth inhibitory effects of TGF-beta is common in human cancers. However, the mechanism(s) by which tumour cells become resistant to TGF-beta are generally unknown. We have identified five novel human genes related to a Drosophila gene called Mad which is thought to transduce signals from TGF-beta family members. One of these genes was found to be somatically mutated in two of eighteen colorectal cancers, and three of the other genes were located at chromosomal positions previously suspected to harbor tumour suppressor genes. These data suggest that this gene family may prove to be important in the suppression of neoplasia, imparting the growth inhibitory effects of TGF-beta-like ligands.

Chromosome deletions are the most common genetic events observed in cancer. These deletions are generally thought to reflect the existence of a tumour suppressor gene within the lost region. However, when the lost region does not precisely coincide with a hereditary cancer locus, identification of the putative tumour suppressor gene (target of the deletion) can be problematic. For example, previous studies have demonstrated that chromosome 18q is lost in over 60% of colorectal as well as in other cancers, but the lost region could not be precisely determined. Here we present a rigorous strategy for mapping and evaluating allelic deletions in sporadic tumours, and apply it to the evaluation of chromosome 18 in colorectal cancers. Using this approach, we define a minimally lost region (MLR) on chromosome 18q21, which contains at least two candidate tumour suppressor genes, DPC4 and DCC. The analysis further suggested genetic heterogeneity, with DPC4 the deletion target in up to a third of the cases and DCC or a neighbouring gene the target in the remaining tumours.

We recently identified a novel tumor-suppressor gene, DPC4, at chromosome 18q21.1 and found that both alleles of DPC4 were inactivated in nearly one-half of the pancreatic carcinomas. Here, we analyzed 338 tumors, originating from 12 distinct anatomic sites, for alterations in the DPC4 gene. Sixty-four specimens were selected for the presence of the allelic loss of 18q and were further analyzed for DPC4 sequence alterations. An alteration of the DPC4 gene sequence was identified in one of eight breast carcinomas and one of eight ovarian carcinomas. These results indicate that whereas DPC4 inactivation is prevalent in pancreatic carcinoma (48%), it is distinctly uncommon (< 10%) in the other tumor types examined. The tissue restriction of alterations in DPC4, as in many other tumor-suppressor genes, emphasizes the complexity of rate-limiting checkpoints in human tumorigenesis.

About 90 percent of human pancreatic carcinomas show allelic loss at chromosome 18q. To identify candidate tumor suppressor genes on 18q, a panel of pancreatic carcinomas were analyzed for convergent sites of homozygous deletion. Twenty-five of 84 tumors had homozygous deletions at 18q21.1, a site that excludes DCC (a candidate suppressor gene for colorectal cancer) and includes DPC4, a gene similar in sequence to a Drosophila melanogaster gene (Mad) implicated in a transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)-like signaling pathway. Potentially inactivating mutations in DPC4 were identified in six of 27 pancreatic carcinomas that did not have homozygous deletions at 18q21.1. These results identify DPC4 as a candidate tumor suppressor gene whose inactivation may play a role in pancreatic and possibly other human cancers.

Mutant forms of the gene encoding the tumor suppressor p53 are found in numerous human malignancies, but the physiologic function of p53 and the effects of mutations on this function are unknown. The p53 protein binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner and thus may regulate gene transcription. Cotransfection experiments showed that wild-type p53 activated the expression of genes adjacent to a p53 DNA binding site. The level of activation correlated with DNA binding in vitro. Oncogenic forms of p53 lost this activity. Moreover, all mutants inhibited the activity of coexpressed wild-type p53, providing a basis for the selection of such mutants during tumorigenesis.

The tumor-suppressor gene p53 is altered by missense mutation in numerous human malignancies. However, the biochemical properties of p53 and the effect of mutation on these properties are unclear. A human DNA sequence was identified that binds specifically to wild-type human p53 protein in vitro. As few as 33 base pairs were sufficient to confer specific binding. Certain guanines within this 33-base pair region were critical, as methylation of these guanines or their substitution with thymine-abrogated binding. Human p53 proteins containing either of two missense mutations commonly found in human tumors were unable to bind significantly to this sequence. These data suggest that a function of p53 may be mediated by its ability to bind to specific DNA sequences in the human genome, and that this activity is altered by mutations that occur in human tumors.

The DNA from a wide variety of human tumors has sustained mutations within the conserved p53 coding regions. We have purified wild-type and tumor-derived mutant p53 proteins expressed from baculovirus vectors and examined their interactions with SV40 DNA. Using DNAase I footprinting assays, we observed that both human and murine wild-type p53 proteins bind specifically to sequences adjacent to the late border of the viral replication origin. By contrast, mutant p53 proteins failed to bind specifically to these sequences. SV40 T antigen prevented wild-type p53 from interacting with this region. These data show that normal but not oncogenic forms of p53 are capable of sequence-specific interactions with viral DNA. Furthermore, they provide insights into the mechanisms by which viral proteins might regulate the control of viral growth and cell division.