Search

The Middle-Upper Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in the Sichuan Basin is regarded as an important reservoir with great potential for hydrocarbon exploration. It is previously indicated that the Xixiangchi carbonates have experienced extensive dolomitization, however, the origin of dolomitizing fluids and the dolomitization mechanism still remain uncertain. In this study, a set of petrographic and geochemical examinations, including rare earth elements (REE) and isotopic (C, O, and Sr) compositions were used to trace the origins of dolomitizing fluids and associated diagenetic processes. The petrographic examination revealed three types of matrix dolomites (D1, D2, D3) and one cement saddle dolomite (SD). These phases have crystal size ranges of less than 30 μm (very fine to fine crystals, D1), 30–100 μm (fine to medium crystals, D2), 100–300 μm (medium to coarsely crystalline dolomite, D3), and 0.3–4 mm (fracture filling cements, SD), respectively. D1 is characterized by non to very weak luminescence, weakly negative Ce anomalies (Ce/Ce* = 0.84 ± 0.02), strongly negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.65 ± 0.03), and high 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.71062 ± 0.00122). In combination with δ13C (−1.5‰ ± 0.2‰) and δ18O (−9.7‰ ± 0.5‰) compositions, D1 is interpreted to be formed by penecontemporaneous dolomitization in the near-surface environment with seawater as the dolomitizing fluid. In contrast, D2 is characterized by intercrystalline pores, dirty crystal surfaces, similar δ13C (−1.4‰ ± 0.4‰) compositions but higher δ18O (−8.9‰ ± 0.7‰) compositions, and lower 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.70992 ± 0.00035), similar Ce anomalies (Ce/Ce* = 0.87 ± 0.04) and higher Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.85 ± 0.04). The coarser D2 is regarded to be formed by the post-penecontemporaneous seepage-reflux dolomitization or by recrystallization of D1 dolomite in a near-surface or shallow burial environment. D3 is distinguished by a cloudy core with clear rims, showing slightly higher Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.88 ± 0.02) and similar Ce anomalies (Ce/Ce* = 0.88 ± 0.02) than those of D1 and D2. Combined with the δ18O compositions (−10.4‰ ± 0.4‰) and 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.70989 ± 0.00048), D3 is thought to be formed by the overgrowth or recrystallization of D1 and D2 dolomites in a shallow to moderate burial environment. The fractures filling SD dolomite consists of nonplanar and much coarser crystals with undulatory extinctions and brighter red luminescence. The lower δ18O (−11.1‰ ± 0.3‰) compositions, lower negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.70 ± 0.01) of SD than the matrix dolomites, and similar Ce anomalies (Ce/Ce* = 0.83 ± 0.01) are indicative of hydrothermal dolomitization, with possible fluids associated with the magma during the period of Emei taphrogenic movement. In addition, the 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.70941 ± 0.00003) of SD suggest probable origin from the coeval seawater partially. Therefore, SD dolomite is interpreted to be formed by hydrothermal dolomitization with mixed dolomitizing fluid of seawater and hydrothermal fluids. In summary, all the matrix dolomites have almost the same ΣREE concentrations and exhibit similar near-flat REE partition patterns with weak LREE enrichments, weakly negative Ce anomalies, and negative Eu anomalies. Such characteristics of REE compositions are indicative of similar evolved dolomitizing fluid, such as seawater or seawater- derived fluids. By contrast, SD dolomites have a different REE partition pattern with left-leaning characteristics, LREE depletions, and negative Eu anomalies, thus suggesting a different dolomitizing fluid source from the matrix dolomites. In addition, the development of intercrystalline pores associated with D2 dolomite makes it more likely to be a potential reservoir, indicating that the dolomitizing history of carbonate has a strong influence on the quality of potential dolomite reservoirs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Through comprehensive research on drilling, logging and core data of T2l1 1 sub-member, which is the major pay of the Leikoupo Formation in the transitional zone of the central and southern Sichuan Basin, the structural characteristics, distribution regularity and its major controlling factors of intra-platform shoal are studied. The major rocks of intra-platform shoal in T2l1 1 sub-member include oosparite, residual oolitic dolostone, sparrenite, residual doloarenite and sparry doloarenite, sparry bioclastic limestone and residual bioclastic dolostone, which constitute oolitic shoal, arene shoal and bioclastic shoal. The intra-platform shoal is characterized vertically by shallowing-upward sequences, and consists of three sedimentary units, namely shoal base, shoal core and shoal cap. Besides, three microfacies can be distinguished laterally, shoal core, shoal edge and intershoal sea. The variation of water depth and hydrodynamic conditions caused by sea level change control the characteristics and superposed pattern of shoal body. Meanwhile, the palaeogeomorphology with alternating uplifts and depressions defines the differential distribution and lateral combination pattern of intra-platform shoal body. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The origin of Precambrian dolomites has attracted research interest as a result of their association with petroleum resources. The long diagenetic history of these dolomites and multiple periods of hydrothermal activity mean that dating and identifying different periods of dolomite formation is challenging. This study focuses on dolomites in the Precambrian Dengying Formation of the Sichuan Basin, central China, and presents new petrographic, in situ laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry U–Pb and trace element, and Sr–C–O isotopic data to characterize three types of dolomite and constrain their age and origin. In situ U–Pb dating of type I dolomite yielded a lower intercept age of 637 ± 35 Ma. The rare earth element (REE) patterns, 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.70827–0.70903), and δ13C VPDB (0.8‰–1.0‰) and δ18O VPDB (−1.5‰ to −1.0‰) values of type I dolomite indicate their derivation from seawater or a precursory source with seawater characteristics. Type II dolomite yielded an age of 636 ± 15 Ma and has lower ΣREE and slightly higher δ13C VPDB (1.2‰–1.5‰) and δ18O VPDB (−0.9‰ to −0.3‰) values than type I, as well as similar 87Sr/86Sr ratios and parallel REE patterns that are indicative of formation by reflux seepage dolomitization. The type III dolomite is characterized by large crystals, unique REE patterns, high 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70942–0.70975), and negative δ18O VPDB values (−6.4‰ to −3.1‰) that indicate a hydrothermal origin. The relationships between hydrothermal dolomite and bitumen indicate that the paleo-oil charging within the Dengying Formation reservoir occurred after the hydrothermal activity at 516 ± 49 Ma. The early hydrothermal activity provided space for the subsequent fluid movement, and oil and gas charging. Our integrated approach, incorporating petrographic, geochemical, isotopic, and geochronological data, constrains the ages of different dolomite phases and an oil-charging event within the Dengying Formation reservoir and provides new insights into the evolution of petroleum systems in general. • We identified three types of dolomites of Dengying Formation matching with the age of diagenesis and fluid activity. • The LA–ICP–MS in situ U–Pb dating of Dengying Formation dolomite yields a lower intercept age of 637 ± 35 Ma. • The dating results suggest an extensional event existed at 516 ± 49 Ma, and accounted for the deposition of hydrocarbon source rocks. • This study outlines potential approaches for furthering our understanding of dolomites and ancient petroleum systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]