Search

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between family communication, family violence, problematic internet use, anxiety, and depression and validate their potential mediating role. Methods: The study population consisted of Chinese adolescents aged 12 to 18 years, and a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2022. Structural equation models were constructed using AMOS 25.0 software to examine the factors that influence adolescent anxiety and depression and the mediating effects of problematic internet use and family violence. Results: The results indicate that family communication was significantly and negatively related to family violence (β = -.494, p < 0.001), problematic internet use (β = -.056, p <.05), depression (β = -.076, p <.01), and anxiety (β = -.071, p <.05). And the finds also indicate that family violence mediated the relationships between family communication and depression (β = -.143, CI: -.198 -.080), and between family communication and anxiety (β = -.141; CI: -.198 -.074). Chain indirect effects between family communication and depression (β = -.051; CI: -.081 -.030) or anxiety (β = -.046; CI: -.080 -.043) via family violence and then through problematic internet use were also found in the present study. Conclusions: In conclusion, positive family communication is crucial in reducing anxiety and depression in adolescents. Moreover, problematic internet use and family violence mediate the effects of positive family communication on anxiety and depression. Therefore, improving family communication and promoting interventions aimed at reducing family violence and problematic internet use can help reduce anxiety and depression in adolescents, thus promoting their healthy development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document is a correction notice for an article titled "A cross-sectional study: family communication, anxiety, and depression in adolescents: the mediating role of family violence and problematic internet use." The original article contained a redundant affiliation and has been updated to correct this error. The authors of the article are Xin-cheng Huang, Yue-ning Zhang, Xiao-yu Wu, Yang Jiang, Hao Cai, Yu-qian Deng, Yuan Luo, Li-ping Zhao, Qin-ling Liu, Sheng-yue Luo, Yan-yan Wang, Li Zhao, Mao-min Jiang, and Yi-bo Wu. [Extracted from the article]