Search

In the present study, the comparative mechanisms of action of phencyclidine (PCP) and amphetamine were addressed employing the parameter of locomotion in rats. PCP-induced locomotion (PLOC) was potently blocked by the selective serotonin (5-HT)2A vs. D2 antagonists, SR46349, MDL100,907, ritanserin and fananserin, which barely affected amphetamine-induced locomotion (ALOC). In contrast, the selective D2 vs. 5-HT2A antagonists, eticlopride, raclopride and amisulpride, preferentially inhibited ALOC vs. PLOC. The potency of these drugs and 12 multireceptorial antipsychotics in inhibiting PLOC vs. ALOC correlated significantly with affinities at 5-HT2A vs. D2 receptors, respectively. Amphetamine and PCP both dose dependently increased dialysate levels of dopamine (DA) and 5-HT in the nucleus accumbens, striatum and frontal cortex (FCX) of freely moving rats, but PCP was proportionally more effective than amphetamine in elevating levels of 5-HT vs. DA in the accumbens. Further, whereas microinjection of PCP into the accumbens elicited locomotion, its introduction into the striatum or FCX was ineffective. The action of intra-accumbens PCP, but not intra-accumbens amphetamine, was abolished by SR46349 and clozapine. Parachloroamphetamine, which depleted accumbens pools of 5-HT but not DA, likewise abolished PLOC without affecting ALOC. In contrast, intra-accumbens 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), which depleted DA but not 5-HT, abolished ALOC but only partially attenuated PLOC. In conclusion, PLOC involves (indirect) activation of accumbens-localized 5-HT2A receptors by 5-HT. PLOC is, correspondingly, more potently blocked than ALOC by antipsychotics displaying marked affinity at 5-HT2A receptors.

Since its inception some two decades ago, microdialysis has rapidly assumed a crucial role as an interface between cellular models of drug actions in vitro and studies of their behavioural effects in vivo. Microdialysis provides invaluable information regarding the mechanisms of action of psychotropic agents and their influence upon endogenous modulators implicated in the aetiology and treatment of CNS disorders. In addition, measures of extracellular levels of specific neurotransmitters are complementary to behavioural parameters in the characterisation of experimental models of psychiatric and neurological diseases. Further, microdialysis can be used for quantification of levels of psychotropic agents themselves in specific brain regions. Though microdialysis techniques are increasingly being applied to a broad variety of cellular mediators, most studies have to date focussed on monoamines, acetylcholine and amino acids like glycine, glutamate and GABA; that is, neurotransmitters strongly implicated in the pathogenesis and control of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia and other psychiatric states. Recent years have seen substantial improvements in the sensitivity of systems for their detection, which now permit, for example, the simultaneous quantification of dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) levels in single dialysis samples; quantification of acetylcholine (ACh) levels in the absence of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; and determination of glutamate and GABA levels concurrently with glycine and a miscellany of related amino acids. The present chapter provides an overview of how microdialysis can be applied to the discovery and evaluation of centrally active drugs. Furthermore, it specifically focuses on the application of novel microdialysis techniques to the characterisation of antipsychotic agents for the improved treatment of schizophrenia.

The benzopyranopyrrole S33084 displayed pronounced affinity (pK(i) = 9.6) for cloned human hD(3)-receptors, and100-fold lower affinity for hD(2) and all other receptors (30) examined. S33084 concentration dependently, potently, and competitively (pA(2) = 9.7) antagonized dopamine (DA)-induced [(35)S]guanosine-5'- O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding at hD(3)-receptors. It also concentration dependently abolished stimulation by DA of hD(3)-receptor-coupled mitogen-activated protein kinase. Administered alone, S33084 did not modify dialysate levels of DA in the frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, or striatum of freely moving rats, nor the firing rate of ventrotegmental dopaminergic cell bodies. Furthermore, it had minimal effect on DA turnover in mesocortical, mesolimbic, and nigrostriatal projection regions. However, S33084 dose dependently blocked the suppressive influence of the preferential D(3)-agonist PD128,907 on frontocortical release of DA. Furthermore, it likewise antagonized the inhibitory influence of PD128,907 on the electrical activity of ventrotegmental dopaminergic neurons. Although less potent than S33084, GR218,231 likewise behaved as a selective hD(3)- versus hD(2)-receptor antagonist and its neurochemical and electrophysiological profiles were similar. In contrast, L741,626 was a preferential antagonist at hD(2) versus hD(3) sites. In vivo, on administration alone, L741,626 increased frontocortical, mesolimbic, and (more potently) striatal DA release, enhanced the firing rate of dopaminergic perikarya, and accelerated cerebral DA synthesis. It also blocked the actions of PD128,907. In conclusion, S33084 is a novel, potent, selective, and competitive antagonist at hD(3)-receptors. Although GR218,231 behaves similarly, L741,626 is a preferential D(2)-receptor antagonist. DA D(2)- but not D(3)-(auto) receptors tonically inhibit ascending dopaminergic pathways, although the latter may contribute to phasic suppression of DA release in frontal cortex.

The present study evaluated, via a combined electrophysiological and dialysis approach, the potential influence of serotonin (5-HT)(2C) as compared to 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2B) receptors on dopaminergic, adrenergic, and serotonergic transmission in frontal cortex (FCX). Whereas the selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist MDL100,907 failed to modify extracellular levels of dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA) or 5-HT simultaneously quantified in single dialysate samples of freely-moving rats, the 5-HT(2B)/5-HT(2C) antagonist SB206,553 dose-dependently increased levels of DA and NA without affecting those of 5-HT. This action was attributable to 5-HT(2C) receptor blockade inasmuch as the selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist SB242,084 likewise increased FCX levels of DA and NA, whereas the selective 5-HT(2B) antagonist SB204,741 was ineffective. Further, the preferential 5-HT(2C) receptor agonist Ro60-0175 dose-dependently depressed FCX levels of DA. The suppressive influence of 5-HT(2C) receptors on DA release was also expressed on mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways, in that levels of DA in nucleus accumbens and striatum were likewise reduced by Ro60-0175 and elevated, though less markedly, by SB206,553. In line with the above findings, Ro60-0175 dose-dependently decreased the firing rate of ventrotegmental dopaminergic and locus coeruleus (LC) adrenergic perikarya, whereas their activity was dose-dependently enhanced by SB206,553. Furthermore, SB206,553 transformed the firing pattern of ventrotegmental dopaminergic neurons into a burst mode. In contrast to SB206,553, MDL100,907 had little affect on the firing rate of dopaminergic or adrenergic neurons. In conclusion, as compared to 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2B) receptors, 5-HT(2C) receptors exert a tonic, suppressive influence on the activity of mesocortical - as well as mesolimbic and nigrostriatal - dopaminergic pathways, likely via indirect actions expressed at the level of their cell bodies. Frontocortical adrenergic, but not serotonergic, transmission is also tonically suppressed by 5-HT(2C) receptors.

Mirtazapine displayed marked affinity for cloned, human alpha2A-adrenergic (AR) receptors at which it blocked noradrenaline (NA)-induced stimulation of guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]-GTPgammaS) binding. Similarly, mirtazapine showed high affinity for cloned, human serotonin (5-HT)2C receptors at which it abolished 5-HT-induced phosphoinositide generation. Alpha2-AR antagonist properties were revealed in vivo by blockade of UK-14,304-induced antinociception, while antagonist actions at 5-HT2C receptors were demonstrated by blockade of Ro 60 0175-induced penile erections and discriminative stimulus properties. Mirtazapine showed negligible affinity for 5-HT reuptake sites, in contrast to the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, citalopram. In freely moving rats, in the dorsal hippocampus, frontal cortex (FCX), nucleus accumbens and striatum, citalopram increased dialysate levels of 5-HT, but not dopamine (DA) and NA. On the contrary, mirtazapine markedly elevated dialysate levels of NA and, in FCX, DA, whereas 5-HT was not affected. Citalopram inhibited the firing rate of serotonergic neurons in dorsal raphe nucleus, but not of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area, nor adrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus. Mirtazapine, in contrast, enhanced the firing rate of dopaminergic and adrenergic, but not serotonergic, neurons. Following 2 weeks administration, the facilitatory influence of mirtazapine upon dialysate levels of DA and NA versus 5-HT in FCX was maintained, and the influence of citalopram upon FCX levels of 5-HT versus DA and NA was also unchanged. Moreover, citalopram still inhibited, and mirtazapine still failed to influence, dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons. In conclusion, in contrast to citalopram, mirtazapine reinforces frontocortical dopaminergic and corticolimbic adrenergic, but not serotonergic, transmission. These actions reflect antagonist properties at alpha2A-AR and 5-HT2C receptors.

We examined the involvement of multiple monoaminergic receptors in the induction of spontaneous tail-flicks (STFs) by the open channel blocker at N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, dizocilpine, and the NMDA recognition site antagonist 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP). At doses eliciting a maximal STF response, dizocilpine and CPP elevated levels of norepinephrine, but not dopamine or serotonin, in dialysates of nucleus accumbens, their known locus of action in eliciting STFs. Chemically diverse alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor (AR) antagonists atipamezole, L745,743, RX821,002, idazoxan, and desfluparoxan abolished induction of STFs by dizocilpine, whereas the preferential alpha(1)-AR antagonists prazosin, WB4101, and ARC239 were weakly active: relative potencies in blocking STFs correlated significantly with affinity at alpha(2)-ARs. The D(1)/D(5) receptor antagonists SCH23390, SCH39166, and NNC756 potently abolished STFs, whereas the D(2) antagonist L741,626, the D(3) antagonists GR218,231 and S14297, and the D(4) antagonists S18126 and L745,870 were inactive. D(1) and alpha(2)-AR antagonists also blocked induction of STFs by CPP. Blockade of dizocilpine-induced STFs was specific inasmuch as idazoxan and SCH 23390 did not modify induction of ataxia by dizocilpine. Antagonists at multiple 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors failed to modify induction of STFs. Finally, dizocilpine-induced STFs were blocked by clozapine and 11 other antipsychotics, the potency of which correlated significantly with affinity at alpha(2)-ARs. In conclusion, STFs evoked by interruption of transmission at NMDA receptors are dependent on D(1) receptors and alpha(2)-ARs for their expression. Antagonism of the alpha(2)-ARs is involved in their blockade by antipsychotics. This model should facilitate exploration of interrelationships between glutamatergic and monoaminergic mechanisms involved in psychiatric and neurologic disorders.

The benzofurane (+)-S 14297, the benzamide nafadotride, the aminoindane U 99194 and the arylpiperazine GR 103,691 have been proposed as "selective" antagonists at dopamine D3 vs. D2 receptors. Herein, we compared their in vitro affinities and in vivo actions to those of the aminotetralin D3 antagonists (+)-AJ 76 and (+)-UH 232. Affinities at recombinant, human (h)D3 and/or hD2 sites were determined by employing the mixed D2/D3 antagonist [125I]-iodosulpride and the preferential D3 ligands [3H]-(+)-PD 128, 907 and [3H]-(+)-S 14297. [3H]-(+)-PD 128,907, [3H]-(+)-S 14297 and [125I]-iodosulpride yielded an essentially identical pattern of displacement at D3 sites, which suggests that they recognize the same population of receptors. The rank order of potency (Ki values in nM vs. [3H]-(+)-PD 128,907) was GR 103,691 (0.4) approximately nafadotride (0.5)haloperidol (2) approximately (+)-UH 232 (3) approximately (+)-S 14297 (5)(+)-AJ 76 (26)U 99194 (160). The rank order of preference (Ki ratio, D2:D3) for D3 receptors (labeled by [3H]-PD 128,907) vs. D2 sites (labeled by [125I]-iodosulpride) was (+)-S 14297 (61) approximately GR 103,691 (60)U 99194 (14)nafadotride (9) approximately (+)-UH 232 (8) approximately (+)-AJ 76 (6)haloperidol (0.2). (+)-S 14297 and GR 103,691 also showed greater than 100-fold selectivity at dopamine hD3 vs. hD4 and hD1 sites. However, GR 103,691 showed marked affinity for serotonin1A receptors (5.8 nM) and alpha-1 adrenoceptors (12.6 nM). In vivo, all antagonists except GR 103,691 prevented the induction of hypothermia by (+)-PD 128,907 (0.63 mg/kg s.c.) and a further preferential D3 agonist, (+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg s.c.). On the other hand, haloperidol, (+)-AJ 76, (+)-UH 232 and nafadotride all induced catalepsy in rats, whereas (+)-S 14297, U 99194 and GR 103,691 were inactive. Haloperidol, (+)-AJ 76, (+)-UH 232, nafadotride and (weakly) U 99194 also enhanced prolactin secretion and striatal dopamine synthesis, whereas (+)-S 14297 and GR 103,691 were inactive. However, despite its high affinity at 5-HT1A receptors and alpha-1 adrenoceptors, both of which are present on raphe-localized serotonergic neurons, GR 103,691 (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) failed to influence their basal firing rate or the inhibition of their electrical activity by the 5-HT1A agonist (+/-)-8-OH-DPAT (0.005 mg/kg i.v.), a result that casts doubt on its activity in vivo. In conclusion, both (+)-S 14297 and GR 103,691 are markedly selective ligands that permit the characterization of actions at hD3 vs. hD2 receptors in vitro, but (+)-S 14297 appears to be of greater utility for the evaluation of their functional significance in vivo. Nevertheless, to develop a better understanding of the respective roles of dopamine D3 and D2 receptors, we need additional, chemically diverse antagonists of improved potency and selectivity.

S 16924 showed a pattern of interaction at multiple (20) native, rodent and cloned, human (h) monoaminergic receptors similar to that of clozapine and different to that of haloperidol. Notably, like clozapine, the affinity of S 16924 for hD2 and hD3 receptors was modest, and it showed 5-fold higher affinity for hD4 receptors. At each of these sites, using a [35S]GTPgammaS binding procedure, S 16924, clozapine and haloperidol behaved as antagonists. In distinction to haloperidol, S 16924 shared the marked affinity of clozapine for h5-HT2A and h5-HT2C receptors. However, an important difference to clozapine (and haloperidol) was the high affinity of S 16924 for h5-HT1A receptors. At these sites, using a [35S]GTPgammaS binding model, both S 16924 and clozapine behaved as partial agonists, whereas haloperidol was inactive. In vivo, the agonist properties of S 16924 at 5-HT1A autoreceptors were revealed by its ability to potently inhibit the firing of raphe-localized serotoninergic neurones, an action reversed by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100,635. In contrast, clozapine and haloperidol only weakly inhibited raphe firing, and their actions were resistant to WAY 100,635. Similarly, S 16924 more potently inhibited striatal turnover of 5-HT than either clozapine or haloperidol. Reflecting its modest affinity for D2 (and D3) autoreceptors, S 16924 only weakly blocked the inhibitory influence of the dopaminergic agonist, apomorphine, upon the firing rate of ventrotegmental area-localized dopaminergic neurones. Further, S 16924 only weakly increased striatal, mesolimbic and mesocortical turnover of dopamine (DA). Clozapine was, similarly, weakly active in these models, whereas haloperidol, in line with its higher affinity at D2 (and D3) receptors, was potently active. In the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely moving rats, S 16924 dose-dependently reduced dialysate levels of 5-HT, whereas those of DA and NAD were dose-dependently increased in the same samples. In contrast, although S 16924 also suppressed 5-HT levels in the striatum and nucleus accumbens, DA levels therein were unaffected. Clozapine mimicked this selective increase in DA levels in the FCX as compared to striatum and accumbens. In contrast, haloperidol modestly increased DA levels in the FCX, striatum and accumbens to the same extent. In distinction to S 16924, clozapine and haloperidol exerted little influence upon 5-HT levels. Finally, the influence of S 16924 upon FCX levels of 5-HT, DA (and NAD) was attenuated by WAY 100,635. In conclusion, S 16924 possesses a profile of interaction at multiple monoaminergic receptors comparable to that of clozapine and distinct to that of haloperidol. In addition, S 16924 is a potent, partial agonist at 5-HT1A receptors. Correspondingly, acute administration of S 16924 decreases cerebral serotoninergic transmission and selectively reinforces frontocortical as compared to subcortical dopaminergic transmission. In line with these actions, S 16924 shows a distinctive profile of activity in functional (behavioral) models of potential antipsychotic activity (companion paper).

The novel, potential anxiolytic, S 15535 (4-(benzodioxan-5-yl)1-(indan-2-yl)piperazine), is an agonist and antagonist (weak partial agonist) at pre- and postsynaptic serotonin (5-HT)1A receptors, respectively. Herein, we characterized its influence on dialysate levels of 5-HT, dopamine (DA) and NAD simultaneously determined in single samples of the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely moving rats, and compared its activity in several other models of potential antidepressant (AD) properties with those of the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), fluoxetine. S 15535 displayed high affinity at cloned human (h) 5-HT1A receptors (Ki = 0.7 nM) and250-fold lower affinity at cloned hD2 (400 nM), hD3 (248 nM) and h alpha2A-adrenergic (AR) (190 nM) receptors. S 15535 (0.08-5.0 mg/kg s.c.) markedly and dose-dependently suppressed dialysate levels of 5-HT in the FCX, nucleus accumbens and striatum of freely moving rats, whereas fluoxetine (10.0 mg/kg s.c.) elevated levels of 5-HT in each structure. In contrast to 5-HT, dialysate levels of DA and NAD in the FCX were dose-dependently increased by S 15535, and this effect was mimicked by fluoxetine. The influence of S 15535 and fluoxetine on FCX levels of DA was regionally specific inasmuch as dialysate levels of DA in the accumbens and striatum were not modified. The selective 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY 100,635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide (0.16) transiently elicited a slight increase in cortical levels of 5-HT, an action opposite to that of S 15535. Further, in the presence of WAY 100,635 (0.16), the influence of S 15535 (0.63) on cortical levels of 5-HT, DA and NAD was markedly attenuated. Upon chronic administration of S 15535 or fluoxetine (10.0 mg/kg s.c. daily for 14 days, in each case), there was no significant alteration in the density of beta-AR receptors in the FCX. However, in contrast to fluoxetine, S 15535 elicited a significant (25%) decrease in the density (Bmax) of 5-HT2A receptors labeled by [3H]ketanserin in the cortex; there was no alteration in Kd. In a learned helplessness paradigm in rats, S 15535 (0.63-40.0 mg/kg p.o.) markedly reduced escape deficits on each of three consecutive days of testing. Fluoxetine (2.0-8.0 mg/kg i.p.) was also active in each session, but presented a biphasic dose-response curve. Finally, under the conditions used, neither S 15535 (0.63-10.0) nor fluoxetine (0.63-10.0) decreased immobility time in the forced swim test. In conclusion, S 15535 is a selective ligand of cloned, h5-HT1A receptors. Its agonist actions at 5-HT1A autoreceptors underlie its ability to decrease extracellular levels of 5-HT in the FCX, and likely contribute to the increase in extracellular levels of DA and NAD evoked by S 15535 in this structure. Further, S 15535 is active in several other, although not all, models of potential AD activity. Thus, although S 15535 is under development as an anxiolytic agent, a further characterization of its putative AD actions would be of interest.

In this study, we used a complementary in vivo electrophysiological and (in individual rats) neurochemical approach to characterize the actions of chemically diverse serotonin (5-HT)1A receptor ligands at central 5-HT1A autoreceptors as compared to dopamine (DA) D2 autoreceptors and presynaptic alpha-2 adrenergic receptors (ARs). The novel, high efficacy, 5-HT1A agonists, WY 48,723 (an arylpiperazine), (+)-flesinoxan (a benzodioxane) and S 14671 and S 14506 (methoxynaphtylpiperazines) mimicked the aminotetralin, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), in inhibiting the firing of dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) neurons. Similarly, the firing rate of DRN neurons was reduced by the "partial" agonists, MDL 73005EF, BMY 7378, NAN-190, tandospirone and the novel pyrimidinylpiperazine, zalospirone. Furthermore, S 14489, S 15535 and S 15931, novel benzodioxopiperazines, which behave as antagonists at postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, inhibited completely DRN firing, whereas the methoxyphenylpiperazine, WAY 100,135, and the aryloxoarylamine, (-)-tertatolol, were ineffective. Indeed, in analogy to spiperone, both WAY 100,135 and (-)-tertatolol behaved as apparently competitive antagonists in that, in their presence, the dose-response curves for inhibition of DRN firing by S 14671, S 14506 or 8-OH-DPAT were shifted in parallel to the right with no loss of maximal effect. In distinction to WAY 100,135 and (-)-tertatolol, a further novel, putative "antagonist," SDZ 216-525 (a benzoisothiazolpiperazine) weakly inhibited the electrical activity of the DRN. With the exception of (-)-tertatolol, which behaved as a weak agonist, a very similar pattern of inhibition of 5-HT turnover was seen in the striatum (innervated by the DRN), the hippocampus and the hypothalamus (DRN and median raphe nucleus) and the spinal cord (nucleus raphe magnus), with the striatum displaying the greatest sensitivity. Drug potency for inhibition of firing and turnover was highly correlated (r = 0.80-0.82) and these actions were significantly correlated to affinity at (hippocampal) 5-HT1A receptors (r = 0.62-0.73). As concerns DA D2 autoreceptors, the agonist action of apomorphine in reducing DA turnover were mimicked only by 8-OH-DPAT, whereas the majority of the other 5-HT1A ligands, in analogy to raclopride, enhanced DA turnover. The facilitation of DA turnover appeared to reflect direct blockade of DA D2 autoreceptors because potency was correlated powerfully to affinity at these D2 sites (r = 0.89).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Brain norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin levels were determined in right and left hemisphere from female C3H/He mice 13 days after their immune system was stimulated by an intraperitoneal injection of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) (107 bacilli/mouse). Increased norepinephrine levels were observed in both hemispheres but significantly only in the right one. No concomitant variations in dopamine or serotonin levels were detected. Furthermore, norepinephrine levels in the right hemisphere appeared to be correlated with the ability of lymphocytes to proliferate after concanavalin A stimulation. The modulation of the immune system by the brain neocortex has been previously shown to be lateralized. Here we show that the information from the immune system towards the central nervous system also appears to be expressed in a lateralized manner.