Search

The leading cause of Down syndrome (DS) is nondisjunction of chromosome 21 occurring during the formation of gametes. In this review, we discuss the progress made to identify risk factors associated with this type of chromosome error occurring in oogenesis and spermatogenesis. For errors occurring in oocytes, the primary risk factors are maternal age and altered recombination. We review the current progress made with respect to these factors and briefly outline the potential environmental and genetic influences that may play a role. Although the studies of paternal nondisjunction are limited due to the relatively small proportion of errors of this type, we review the potential influence of paternal age, recombination and other environmental and genetic factors on susceptibility. Although progress has been made to understand the mechanisms and risk factors that underlie nondisjunction, considerably more research needs to be conducted to dissect this multifactorial trait, one that has a considerable impact on our species., (Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Altered genetic recombination has been identified as the first molecular correlate of chromosome nondisjunction in both humans and model organisms. Little evidence has emerged to link maternal age--long recognized as the primary risk factor for nondisjunction--with altered recombination, although some studies have provided hints of such a relationship. To determine whether an association does exist, chromosome 21 recombination patterns were examined in 400 trisomy 21 cases of maternal meiosis I origin, grouped by maternal age. These recombination patterns were used to predict the chromosome 21 exchange patterns established during meiosis I. There was no statistically significant association between age and overall rate of exchange. The placement of meiotic exchange, however, differed significantly among the age groups. Susceptible patterns (pericentromeric and telomeric exchanges) accounted for 34% of all exchanges among the youngest class of women but only 10% of those among the oldest class. The pattern of exchanges among the oldest age group mimicked the pattern observed among normally disjoining chromosomes 21. These results suggest that the greatest risk factor for nondisjunction among younger women is the presence of a susceptible exchange pattern. We hypothesize that environmental and age-related insults accumulate in the ovary as a woman ages, leading to malsegregation of oocytes with stable exchange patterns. It is this risk, due to recombination-independent factors, that would be most influenced by increasing age, leading to the observed maternal age effect.

Recent studies of trisomy 21 have shown that altered levels of recombination are associated with maternal non-disjunction occurring at both meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII). To comprehend better the association of recombination with nondisjunction, an understanding of the pattern of meiotic exchange, i.e. the exchange of genetic material at the four-strand stage during prophase, is required. We examined this underlying exchange pattern to determine if specific meiotic configurations are associated with a higher risk of non-disjunction than others. We examined the crossover frequencies of chromosome 21 for three populations: (i) normal female meiotic events; (ii) meiotic events leading to MI non-disjunction; and (iii) those leading to MII non-disjunction. From these crossover frequencies, we estimated the array of meiotic tetrads that produced the observed crossovers. Using this approach, we found that nearly one-half of MI errors were estimated to be achiasmate. The majority of the remaining MI bivalents had exchanges that clustered at the telomere. In contrast, exchanges occurring among MII cases clustered at the pericentromeric region of the chromosome. Unlike the single exchange distributions, double exchanges from the non-disjoined populations seemed to approximate the distribution in the normal population. These data suggest that the location of certain exchanges makes a tetrad susceptible to non-disjunction. Specifically, this susceptibility is associated with the distance between the centromere and closest exchange. This result challenges the widely held concept that events occurring at MII are largely independent of events occurring at MI, and suggests that all non-disjunction events may be initiated during MI and simply resolved at either of the two meiotic stages.

The cause of non-disjunction of chromosome 21 remains largely unknown. Advanced maternal age is associated with both maternal meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII) non-disjunction events. While reduced genetic recombination has been demonstrated in maternal MI errors, the basis for MII errors remains uncertain. We studied 133 trisomy 21 cases with maternal MII errors to test the hypothesis that segregation at MII may also be influenced by genetic recombination. Our data support a highly significant association: MII non-disjunction involves increased recombination that is largely restricted to proximal 21q. Thus, while absence of a proximal recombination appears to predispose to non-disjunction in MI, the presence of a proximal exchange predisposes to non-disjunction in MII. These findings profoundly affect our understanding of trisomy 21 as they suggest that virtually all maternal non-disjunction results from events occurring in meiosis I.