Search

Background: Postoperative abdominal fluid collections (PAFCs) are a potentially fatal complication of pancreatobiliary surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has recently been shown to be effective in treating PAFCs of more than 4 weeks old. Little is currently known, however, regarding the EUS-guided drainage of PAFCs of less than 4 weeks. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the early drainage (< 4 weeks) of PAFCs via EUS guidance., Methods: The data of patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage between July 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data of EUS-guided PAFC drainage were obtained from prospectively collected EUS database of our institute and reviewed of patients' clinical parameters based on electrical medical record., Results: A total of 48 patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery were enrolled. The indications of procedure included abdominal pain (n = 27), fever (n = 18), leukocytosis (n = 2), and increased size of PAFC during external tube drainage (n = 1). Technical success was achieved in all cases, and the clinical success rate was 95.8% (46/48). Four patients underwent secondary procedures. The median period from surgery to EUS-guide drainage was 14 days (Interquartile range [IQR] 10-16), and median time to resolution was 23.5 days (IQR 8.5-33.8). Adverse events occurred in two cases that were developed intracystic bleeding and were successfully resolved by arterial coil embolization., Conclusions: Early EUS-guided drainage is a technically feasible, effective, and safe method in patients who have developing PAFCs within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) has been proposed for pancreatic duct obstruction after failure of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. We evaluate the long-term outcomes of EUS-PD using a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis (PJA) strictures following Whipple procedures., Methods: Twenty-three patients with PJA strictures underwent EUS-PD according to the findings of EUS-guided pancreatogram and the passage of the guidewire through PJA stricture (complete vs partial stricture) after failure of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and long-term outcomes were assessed., Results: Technical and clinical success was achieved in all patients. The complete and partial strictures were 11 and 12, respectively. The direct transanastomotic and transmural plastic stenting in partial PJA stricture was successful in only three patients (13%). Therefore, 20 patients underwent EUS-guided transmural FCSEMS placement during the initial attempt. Early AEs, including abdominal pain (n = 3) and peripancreatic fluid collection (n = 1), occurred in four patients (17.4%). During the follow-up periods (median, 27.2 months; interquartile range [IQR], 18.7-40.6), five patients (21.7%) developed late AEs, including asymptomatic stent fracture at the gastric end (n = 3), asymptomatic stent migration (n = 1), and stent occlusion (n = 1). The total duration of stent placement was 27.2 months (IQR, 18.7-40.6), and the median number of stent revision was 2 (IQR, 1-2)., Conclusions: In terms of safety and efficacy, EUS-PD with an FCSEMS showed favorable success and acceptable AEs rate and durable long-term outcomes., (© 2019 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Recently, a newly designed lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with a conventional delivery system was developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a newly designed LAMS for EUS-guided drainage to treat symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts., Methods: This prospective multicenter cohort study included 34 patients with symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts from 2016 to 2017. The patients underwent EUS-guided drainage with the newly designed LAMS (Niti-S SPAXUS; Taewoong Medical Co, Ltd, Ilsan, South Korea). Effectiveness outcome measurements included technical success rate, clinical success rate, successful stent removal rate, and procedural time. Safety outcome measurements included procedure and/or stent-related adverse events (AEs) and overall AEs. Patients were prospectively followed, and consecutive data were collected at discharge, at stent removal, and 20 days after stent removal., Results: Thirty-four patients (mean age 51.7 ± 13.3 years, 26 men) were enrolled. The mean pseudocyst size was 9.23 ± 3.54 cm. The technical success rate was 97.1% (33/34). The clinical success rate was 94.1% (32/34). All stents were successfully removed. The mean procedural time from needle puncture to stent deployment was 10.3 ± 5.7 minutes. Four patients (11.8%) experienced procedure and/or stent-related AEs, including stent maldeployment (n = 1) and pseudocyst infection (n = 3). All patients completely recovered from the AEs. Bleeding caused by the stent or buried LAMS syndrome was not observed. No unplanned endoscopic procedures were required., Conclusions: This study showed that EUS-guided drainage using the newly designed LAMS is technically feasible and effective for the treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02730663.)., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is increasingly accepted as an effective treatment option in patients who require drainage for acute cholecystitis. A newly designed lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been introduced recently in this procedure. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of the newly designed LAMS in patients with acute cholecystitis who were unsuitable for cholecystectomy., Methods: Between Mar 2017 and Oct 2017, 22 patients with acute cholecystitis who were unsuitable for cholecystectomy underwent EUS-GBD with the newly designed LAMS. We evaluated the technical and clinical success and the adverse event profiles., Results: EUS-GBD with newly designed LAMS was technically and clinically successful in 21 of the 22 patients. EUS-GB stenting was performed at urgent setting in 17 patients, while 5 patients, who had undergone initial PTGBD, underwent EUS-GB stenting to remove PTGBD tube. The median procedure time was 11.5 (range 8.8-17.0) min. A late adverse event of stent occlusion developed in one patient. Stent migration was not observed during follow-up (median 318.0 days, range 39.0-398.0 days) and cumulative stent patency rate at 1 year was 95%., Conclusion: EUS-GBD with newly designed LAMS is feasible and shows acceptable safety profiles for both the urgent drainage of acute cholecystitis and elective internalization following PTGBD in patients with high surgical risk.

Background and study aim  Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a rescue procedure after a failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. As PTBD causes patient discomfort, conversion of the PTBD to internal biliary stenting (PTBDS) may be required; however, PTBDS is sometimes difficult because of the tight stricture. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of conversion of external PTBD to endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) after failed PTBDS. Patients and methods  A total of 16 patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction who underwent conversion of external PTBD to EUS-HGS after failed PTBDS were enrolled from two institutions in Korea and Japan. Data were analyzed retrospectively. Results  The technical and clinical success rates were 100 % and 81 %, respectively. Early adverse events developed in two patients: proximal stent migration (n = 1), and cholecystitis (n = 1). Stents were occluded or migrated distally in five patients. The mean duration of stent patency was 402 days. Conclusions  Conversion of external PTBD to EUS-HGS may be a good rescue option after failed PTBDS., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Aims: Although fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) have been commonly used for EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), FCSEMS migration is a main limitation of this procedure. In the present study we evaluated the technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, and long-term outcomes of a newly developed hybrid stent that has been customized for EUS-BD., Methods: From September 2011 to May 2015, 54 consecutive patients with biliary obstruction were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. These patients were candidates for alternative BD techniques because of failed ERCP. The hybrid metal stent used for EUS-BD in this study was partially covered, had anchoring flaps, and is commercially available in Korea., Results: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) was performed in 21 patients and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) in 33 patients. The technical and clinical success rates of EUS-BD were 100% (54/54) and 94.4% (51/54), respectively. Immediate adverse events developed after EUS-BD in 9 patients (16.6%; cholangitis in 3, bleeding in 2, self-limited pneumoperitoneum in 3, and abdominal pain in 1). Proximal or distal stent migration was not observed during the follow-up period (median, 148.5 days; IQR, 79.7-244), and the mean stent patency duration was 166.3 days and 329.1 days in the EUS-HGS and EUS-CDS groups, respectively., Conclusions: EUS-BD with the hybrid metal stent is technically feasible and can effectively treat biliary obstruction after failed ERCP. EUS-BD with the hybrid metal stent can reduce stent-related adverse events, especially stent migration., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Spontaneous hemobilia is an uncommon liver transplantation (LT)-related biliary complication. The frequency, etiology, and mechanism of spontaneous hemobilia after LT are not known. This study aimed to assess the outcome of endoscopic management for spontaneous hemobilia after LT, and to investigate its frequency and risk factors., Methods: The records of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to manage hemobilia after LT at the Asan Medical Center, Korea, between January 2006 and April 2014 were retrospectively reviewed., Results: A total 2701 cases of LT was performed in the study period, and 33 LT patients with spontaneous hemobilia were included in the study group. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage was achieved in 33 cases (100%). In 29 of 33 patients (87.9%), hemobilia was improved. The frequency of spontaneous hemobilia was 1.22% (33/2701). On multivariate analysis, United Network for Organ Sharing status I or IIa (odds ratio [OR] 3.095, 95% CI 1.097-8.732, P = 0.033), alcoholic liver cirrhosis (OR 3.942, 95% CI 1.261-12.324, P = 0.018), and body mass index < 24.5 kg/m 2 (OR 2.329, 95% CI 1.005-5.397, P = 0.049) were significant risk factors for spontaneous hemobilia after LT., Conclusions: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage are feasible methods for the management of spontaneous hemobilia after LT. In patients with United Network for Organ Sharing status I and IIa, alcoholic liver cirrhosis, or body mass index < 24.5 kg/m 2 , special attention should be paid to the occurrence of spontaneous hemobilia after LT., (© 2016 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) with stent placement has been commonly used for patients with malignant biliary obstruction. In PBD, the placement of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) may provide better patency duration and a lower incidence of cholangitis compared with plastic stents. We aimed to evaluate which type of stent showed better outcomes in PBD., Methods: In this multicenter, prospective randomized trial, we compared PBD with FCSEMSs versus plastic stents in 86 patients with malignant biliary obstruction between January 2012 and December 2014. Patients with obstructive jaundice were randomly assigned to undergo PBD either with plastic stents or FCSEMS placement., Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Endoscopic stent placement was technically successful in all patients. Procedure-related adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 groups (plastic vs FCSEMS group; 16.3% vs 16.3%, P = 1.0). Reintervention was required in 16.3% of the plastic stent group and 14.0% of the FCSEMS group (P = .763). The interval to surgery after PBD (plastic vs FCSEMS group; 14.2 ± 8.3 vs 12.3 ± 6.9 days, P = .426) was not significantly different between groups. Surgery-related adverse events occurred in 43.6% of the plastic stent group and 40.0% of the FCSEMS group (P = .755)., Conclusions: In patients with resectable malignant biliary obstruction, the outcomes of PBD with plastic stents and FCSEMSs were similar. Considering the cost-effectiveness, PBD with plastic stents may be preferable to FCSEMS placement. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01789502.)., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Although percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is the standard method for draining a malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs), use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is increasing. We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial to compare EUS-BD vs PTBD for malignant distal biliary obstruction after a failed ERCP., Methods: Patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstructions and failed primary ERCP, caused by inaccessible papilla, were assigned to groups that underwent EUS-BD with an all-in-one device for direct deployment of a partially covered metal stent (without further fistula tract dilation, n = 34) or PTBD (n = 32). The procedures were performed at 4 tertiary academic referral centers in South Korea from October 2014 through March 2015; patients were followed up through June 2015. The primary end point was technical success, which was calculated using a noninferiority model. Secondary end points were functional success, procedure-related adverse events, rate of unscheduled re-intervention, and quality of life (QOL)., Results: The rates of primary technical success were 94.1% (32 of 34) in the EUS-BD group and 96.9% (31 of 32) in the PTBD group (1-sided 97.5% confidence interval lower limit, -12.7%; P = .008 for a noninferiority margin of 15%). The rates of functional success were 87.5% (28 of 32) in the EUS-BD group and 87.1% (27 of 31) in the PTBD group (P = 1.00). The proportions of procedure-related adverse events were 8.8% in the EUS-BD group vs 31.2% in the PTBD group (P = .022); the mean frequency of unscheduled re-intervention was 0.34 in the EUS-BD group vs 0.93 in the PTBD group (P = .02). The QOL was similar between groups., Conclusions: EUS-BD and PTBD had similar levels of efficacy in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction and inaccessible papilla based on rates of technical and functional success and QOL. However, EUS-BD produced fewer procedure-related adverse events and unscheduled re-interventions. Clinical trial registration no: cris.nih.go.kr/KCT0001370., (Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been proposed as an alternative for patients after failed ERCP. To date, the evaluation of dedicated device for one-step EUS-BD has been limited. To determine feasibility and safety of a newly designed 7F stent introducer with tapered metal tip as a push-type dilator for one-step metal stent placement without additional fistula dilation in EUS-BD., Methods: Thirty-two patients with malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP were randomly assigned to a dedicated stent introducer with a modified hybrid metal stent (DH group, n = 16) or a conventional 8.5F biliary metal stent introducer with a fully covered metal stent (FC group, n = 16). The technical success, procedural times, clinical success rate, and adverse event rates were evaluated., Results: One-step technical success without additional fistula dilation in the DH was 88% (14/16). Multi-step process in a stent placement was performed in all patients of the FC group. The procedural time in the DH was significantly shorter than the FC (10 vs. 15 min, P = 0.007). No difference in overall technical or clinical success was seen between the groups. The rate of an early adverse event was common in the FC compared with the DH (31.3% [5/16] in the FC vs. 6.3% [1/16] in the DH, P = 0.172), although not statistically significant., Conclusions: A dedicated device for one-step EUS-BD may be technically feasible, safe, and shorten the procedural times with less chance of an additional fistula dilation process, resulting in a potential reduction of the early adverse events., (© 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

With the evolution of the linear echoendoscope and the improved ability to direct a needle within the field of interest, the therapeutic potential of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has greatly expanded. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) may be the next frontier for therapeutic EUS. Since EUS-GBD was first described in 2007, recent reports have suggested it as an alternative to external gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. EUS-GBD includes EUS-guided transmural nasogallbladder drainage, EUS-guided gallbladder aspiration, and EUS-guided transmural gallbladder stenting. Indications for the EUS-GBD technique as currently practiced, including equipment, technical details, complications, and efficacy are herein reviewed., (© 2014 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2014 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background and Study Aims: Peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) have been adequately drained using multiple plastic stents placed in a single-step endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedure. Recent reports have presented the usefulness of metal stents for this procedure; however, there has been no prospective comparative study on their effectiveness and safety. We conducted a prospective randomized study to compare multiple plastic stents with fully covered, self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) for the drainage of PFCs., Patients and Methods: Between January 2012 and May 2013, patients with PFCs demonstrated by various modalities were enrolled in our study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a FCSEMS or plastic stents for EUS-guided PFC drainage. The procedure time, technical success rate, and adverse event rates of the PFCs were evaluated., Results: 50 patients (41 men) were included and randomly assigned to either the FCSEMS group (n = 25) or the plastic stent group (n = 25). The median procedure time with FCSEMS was significantly shorter than with plastic stents (15.0 min vs. 29.5 min, P < 0.01). The technical success rate was 100 % for both groups. The clinical success rate was 20 out of 23 for FCSEMS and 20 out of 22 for plastic stents (P = 0.97). No adverse events occurred in the FCSEMS group, while adverse events occurred in two patients in the plastic stent group (P = 0.16). One recurrence was observed during follow-up in the FCSEMS group and none in the plastic stent group (P = 0.15)., Conclusions: EUS-guided PFC drainage with FCSEMSs is comparable to such drainage with plastic stents in terms of technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety; however, the use of FCSEMSs may also simplify and shorten the procedure., Clinical Trial Registration: KCT0000766 (https://cris.nih.go.kr)., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) may be a feasible and useful alternative in patients with malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP. One of the main limitations of EUS-BD is the lack of devices specifically tailored to this technique., Objective: To evaluate a newly developed hybrid metal stent customized for EUS-BD., Design: A prospective, observational study., Setting: A tertiary academic referral center., Patients: A total of 27 consecutive patients with malignant biliary obstruction who were candidates for alternative techniques for biliary drainage because of failed ERCP were enrolled., Interventions: EUS-BD with a newly developed hybrid metal stent., Main Outcome Measurements: The technical and clinical success rates and adverse events, including proximal or distal stent migration and cholangitis., Results: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy was performed in 10 patients, and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy was performed in 17 patients. The technical success rate of EUS-BD with the hybrid metal stent was 100% (27/27), and clinical success was achieved in 96.3% (26/27) of the cases. Adverse events developed in 5 patients (5/27, 18.5%), including a self-limited pneumoperitoneum in 3 patients, minor bleeding in 1 patient, and abdominal pain in 1 patient. During the follow-up period (median 134 days), proximal or distal stent migration was not observed., Limitations: This study was performed at a single center by a single experienced operator with a relatively small number of patients., Conclusion: EUS-BD with a hybrid metal stent is technically feasible and can be an effective treatment for malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP. Hybrid metal stents may be used safely in EUS-BD, and they can prevent stent-related adverse events., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Study Aim: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transmural gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been proposed for the management of acute cholecystitis in high risk patients; however, little is known about the long-term outcomes of this treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the procedural and long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD with self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS)., Patients and Methods: Data for this retrospective study were obtained from a prospectively collected EUS database. Patients with acute cholecystitis who were deemed unsuitable for cholecystectomy were included. Study outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events, and stent patency., Results: EUS-GBD was technically and clinically successful in 62/63 patients (98.4 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 94.9 % - 100 %). Procedural adverse events included duodenal perforation (n = 1, 1.6 %) and self-limiting pneumoperitoneum (n = 2, 3.2 %), all of which resolved with conservative treatment. Long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD were evaluated in 56 patients who were followed for a median of 275 days (range 40 - 1185 days). Late adverse events developed in four patients (7.1 %; 95 %CI 5.7 % - 8.4 %), including asymptomatic distal stent migration (n = 2), and acute cholecystitis due to stent occlusion (n = 2). Two patients with occluded stent were successfully treated endoscopically (reintervention rate of 3.6 %). A total of 54 patients (96.4 %) had no recurrence of acute cholecystitis during follow-up. Median stent patency time was 190 days overall (range 15 - 1185 days) and 458 days (range 151 - 1185 days) for the 28 patients who were alive at the study end. The cumulative stent patency rate was 86 % at 3 years., Conclusions: EUS-GBD with an SEMS for acute cholecystitis showed excellent long-term outcomes and may be a definitive treatment in patients who are unsuitable for cholecystectomy because of advanced malignancy or high surgical risk., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Aim: To evaluate the technical feasibility of a modified tapered metal tip and low profile introducer for one-step endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) in a new experimental biliary dilatation porcine model., Methods: A novel dedicated device for one-step EUS-guided biliary drainage system (DEUS) introducer has size 3F tapered catheter with size 4F metal tip for simple puncture of the intestinal wall and liver parenchyma without graded dilation. A self-expandable metal stent, consisting of both uncovered and nitinol-covered portions, was preloaded into DEUS introducer. After establishment of a biliary dilatation model using endoscopic hemoclips or band ligation with argon plasma coagulation in 9 mini-pigs, EUS-BD using a DEUS was performed following 19-G needle puncture without the use of fistula dilation devices., Results: One-step EUS-BD was technically successful in seven pigs [7/9 (77.8%) as intention to treat] without the aid of devices for fistula dilation from the high body of stomach or far distal esophagus to the intrahepatic (n = 2) or common hepatic (n = 5) duct. Primary technical failure occurred in two cases that did not show adequate biliary dilatation. In seven pigs with a successful bile duct dilatation, the technical success rate was 100% (7/7 as per protocol). Median procedure time from confirmation of the dilated bile duct to successful placement of a metallic stent was 10 min (IQR; 8.9-18.1). There were no immediate procedure-related complications., Conclusion: Modified tapered metal tip and low profile introducer may be technically feasible for one-step EUS-BD in experimental porcine model.

Aim: To evaluate the success rates, procedural time and adverse event rates of the modified methods in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS)., Methods: Twenty-eight patients in a prospective case series who underwent EUS-HGS (phase I). Forty-six patients in a matched case-control study (phase II). The simplified technique for fistula dilation was the primary use of a 4 mm balloon catheter with a stainless steel stylet. The stent deployment was modified by deploying the metal stent inside a bile duct (half of the stent) under EUS and fluoroscopic guidance and gently pulling the echoendoscope after full deployment of the stent inside the echoendoscope channel (remaining portion of the stent) under fluoroscopic guidance. This cohort was compared with a matched historical cohort., Results: In phase I, the technical and clinical success with the modified method was 96% (27/28) and 89% (24/27 as per-protocol analysis). The overall adverse event rate was 7%. In phase II, there was no difference in technical and clinical success, stent patency and overall adverse events in each group. However, the procedural time (15.3 ± 5.2 min vs 22.3 ± 6.0 min, P < 0.001) and early adverse events (0% vs 26%, P = 0.02) were statistically improved in case cohort compared with control cohort., Conclusion: Compared with the conventional EUS-HGS technique, the procedural time was shorter and early adverse events were less frequent with our simplified and modified technique.

Background & Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for patients with acute, high-risk, or advanced-stage cholecystitis who do not respond to initial medical treatment and cannot undergo emergency cholecystectomy. However, the technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EUS-GBD and PTGBD have not been compared., Methods: Fifty-nine patients with acute cholecystitis, who did not respond to initial medical treatment and were unsuitable for an emergency cholecystectomy, were chosen randomly to undergo EUS-GBD (n = 30) or PTGBD (n = 29). The technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EUS-GBD and PTGBD were compared., Results: EUS-GBD and PTGBD showed similar technical (97% [29 of 30] vs 97% [28 of 29]; 95% 1-sided confidence interval lower limit, -7%; P = .001 for noninferiority margin of 15%) and clinical (100% [29 of 29] vs 96% [27 of 28]; 95% 1-sided confidence interval lower limit, -2%; P = .0001 for noninferiority margin of 15%) success rates, and similar rates of complications (7% [2 of 30] vs 3% [1 of 29]; P = .492 in the Fisher exact test) and conversions to open cholecystectomy (9% [2 of 23] vs 12% [3 of 26]; P = .999 in the Fisher exact test). The median post-procedure pain score was significantly lower after EUS-GBD than after PTGBD (1 vs 5; P < .001 in the Mann-Whitney U test)., Conclusions: EUS-GBD is comparable with PTGBD in terms of the technical feasibility and efficacy; there were no statistical differences in the safety. EUS-GBD is a good alternative for high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis who cannot undergo an emergency cholecystectomy., (Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been proposed as an effective alternative for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed ERCP. To date, the risk factors for adverse events and long-term outcomes of EUS-BD with transluminal stenting (EUS-BDS) have not been fully explored., Objective: To evaluate risk factors for adverse events and long-term outcomes of EUS-BDS., Design: Prospective follow-up study., Setting: Tertiary-care academic center., Patients: This study involved 57 consecutive patients with malignant or benign biliary obstruction undergoing EUS-BDS after failed ERCP., Intervention: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy with transluminal stenting (EUS-CDS)., Main Outcome Measurements: Risk factors for postprocedure and late adverse events and clinical outcomes of EUS-BDS., Results: The overall technical and functional success rates, respectively, in the EUS-BDS group were 96.5% (intention-to-treat, n = 55/57) and 89% (per-protocol, n = 49/55). Postprocedure adverse events developed after EUS-BDS in 11 patients (20%, n = 11/55). This included bile peritonitis (n = 2), mild bleeding (n = 2), and self-limited pneumoperitoneum (n = 7). In multivariate analysis, needle-knife use was the single risk factor for postprocedure adverse events after EUS-BDS (odds ratio 12.4; P = .01). A late adverse event in EUS-BDS was distal stent migration (7%, n = 4/55). The mean stent patencies with EUS-HGS and EUS-CDS were 132 days and 152 days, respectively., Limitations: Single-operator performed, nonrandomized study., Conclusion: EUS-HGS and EUS-CDS may be relatively safe and can be used as an alternative to PTBD after failed ERCP. Both techniques offer durable and comparable stent patency. The use of a needle-knife for fistula dilation in EUS-BDS should be avoided if possible., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with acute cholecystitis, percutaneous cholecystostomy has been performed in patients unsuitable for cholecystectomy. EUS-guided transgastric/transduodenal gallbladder drainage by using a plastic stent and/or nasobiliary drainage may be an alternative effective treatment for these patients, but bile leakage into the peritoneal space causing bile peritonitis is not uncommon during placement of a plastic stent., Objective: To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of EUS-guided transgastric/transduodenal gallbladder drainage with single-step placement of a modified covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) in patients with acute cholecystitis who are unsuitable for cholecystectomy., Design: Prospective feasibility study., Setting: Tertiary-care referral center., Patients: This study involved 15 patients with acute cholecystitis who did not respond to initial medical treatment and were unsuitable for cholecystectomy., Intervention: EUS-guided transgastric/transduodenal gallbladder drainage with single-step placement of a modified CSEMS., Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success, functional success, complications associated with the placement of a metal stent, and recurrence of acute cholecystitis., Results: Modified CSEMSs were successfully placed in all patients through the stomach (n = 10) or duodenum (n = 5). All patients achieved functional success within 3 days of metal stent placement. Pneumoperitoneum occurred in two patients during or after the procedure, but both patients improved with conservative management. During follow-up (median 145 days, range 60-297 days), no patient experienced recurrent cholecystitis., Limitations: Small patient population without long-term follow-up., Conclusion: Placement of a modified CSEMS after EUS-guided transgastric/transduodenal gallbladder drainage may be a feasible and safe alternative to treatments such as percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis who are unsuitable for cholecystectomy., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) with the use of a fully covered metal stent can result in a large-diameter fistula between the bile duct and the duodenum or stomach. This sustainable fistula may constitute a new endoscopic route to the bile duct., Objective: To assess the feasibility of performing endoscopic procedures through EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy or hepaticogastrostomy with a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS)., Design: Observational pilot study., Setting: Tertiary-care referral center., Patients: This study involved 3 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-BD with an FCSEMS for biliary decompression., Interventions: One to four weeks after EUS-BD with an FCSEMS, endoscopic procedures for the bile duct were performed through the sinus tract to evaluate and manage intrabiliary lesions., Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success and procedural complications of endoscopic procedures through EUS-BD with an FCSEMS., Results: Endoscopic procedures were completed through the sinus tract of EUS-BD. Two patients underwent photodynamic therapy for tumor bleeding in the common bile duct and argon plasma coagulation on the biliary intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm repeatedly under direct visual guidance. In the other patient, photodynamic therapy was performed on the malignant hilar stricture through EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with an FCSEMS., Limitations: Small sample size, pilot study., Conclusions: EUS-BD with an FCSEMS may result in a large-diameter sustainable fistula. Endoscopic intervention through this fistula seems to be feasible and useful for the management of intrabiliary lesions., (Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Currently, percutaneous drainage is the first treatment of choice for hepatic abscesses because of its high success and low mortality rates compared with other surgical procedures. However, percutaneous drainage of hepatic abscesses in the caudate lobe or gastrohepatic space may be difficult., Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the technical feasibility and clinical implication of EUS-guided drainage for hepatic abscesses not accessible to percutaneous biliary drainage., Design: Single-center prospective case series., Setting: Academic tertiary referral center., Patients: This study involved 3 consecutive patients with hepatic abscesses not accessible to percutaneous biliary drainage: 2 in the caudate lobe and 1 in the gastrohepatic extension from the posteromedial aspect of the lateral segment., Interventions: EUS-guided drainage with a plastic stent and/or nasocystic tube was conducted using a therapeutic linear-array echoendoscope under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance., Results: The EUS-guided transgastric approach was performed in 2 patients (1 in the caudate lobe, and 1 in the gastrohepatic space). In the other patient (caudate lobe), EUS-guided transduodenal drainage was conducted. EUS-guided drainage with the placement of a plastic stent and/or nasocystic tube was successful in all of the patients. Complete resolution of the hepatic abscesses and symptom relief were achieved in all of the patients (3 out of 3, 100%). No procedural complications were observed. Follow-up results were also favorable., Limitations: Small series of cases., Conclusions: For this case series, EUS-guided drainage of hepatic abscesses not accessible to percutaneous drainage, such as those in the caudate lobe or gastrohepatic space, is technically feasible, safe, and provides complete drainage, symptom relief, and favorable follow-up results., (Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUSBD) with plastic stents has been introduced as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in cases of biliary obstruction when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is unsuccessful. Although self-expandable metallic stents with a larger diameter might offer long-lasting patency compared with plastic stents, to date, EUSBD with one-step placement of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) has not been evaluated. We conducted this study to determine the feasibility and usefulness of EUSBD with one-step placement of FCSEMS., Methods: A prospective feasibility study on EUSBD with one-step placement of FCSEMS was carried out in 14 patients with malignant biliary obstruction who were candidates for alternative techniques for biliary decompression because of unsuccessful ERCP., Results: The technical and functional success rate was 100% (14/14). Nine patients were treated using the intrahepatic approach. The remaining five patients were treated using the extrahepatic approach. With the intrahepatic approach, two patients showed self-limited pneumoperitoneum. With the extrahepatic approach, no patients had pneumoperitoneum. No bile peritonitis or cholangitis was observed after the procedure in any of the patients treated using the intra- or extrahepatic approach. During follow-up periods (median 6 months), one case of re-intervention (7%, 1/14) necessitated by distal stent migration was observed., Conclusions: EUSBD with one-step placement of an FCSEMS may be feasible, safe, and effective as an alternative to PTBD in cases of malignant biliary obstruction when ERCP is unsuccessful. Prospective randomized trials of EUSBD with plastic stent vs. EUSBD with FCSEMS may be needed.

Objectives: Many studies showed better outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage (EUS‐GBD) when compared with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (P‐GBD) in which most tubes were left in situ. However, no studies have directly compared EUS‐GBD with P‐GBD after tube removal (ex situ). We compared the long‐term outcomes of EUS‐GBD and ex situ or in situ P‐GBD in high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods: We reviewed the records of 182 patients (EUS‐GBD, n = 75; P‐GBD, n = 107) who underwent gallbladder drainage. The procedural outcomes, long‐term outcomes, and adverse events were compared. Results: The EUS‐GBD group and the P‐GBD group had similar rates of technical and clinical success. Early adverse events were less common in the EUS‐GBD group (5.5% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.010). The long‐term outcomes were evaluated in 168 patients (EUS‐GBD, n = 67; P‐GBD ex situ, n = 84; P‐GBD in situ, n = 17). The rate of cholecystitis recurrence in the EUS‐GBD group (6.0%) was similar to that in the P‐GBD ex situ group (9.6%, P = 0.422), but significantly lower than that in the P‐GBD in situ group (23.5%, P = 0.049). P‐GBD in situ was a significant predictor of recurrent cholecystitis (hazard ratio 14.6; 95% confidence interval 2.9–72.8). Conclusion: The long‐term recurrence rate of acute cholecystitis in patients who underwent EUS‐GBD was comparable to that in patients whose P‐GBD could be removed. However, patients in whom P‐GBD could not be removed showed higher rates of recurrent cholecystitis than patients with EUS‐GBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis (AC) although it is always not suitable for patients who are poor candidates for surgery. Recently, endoscopic gallbladder (GB) drainage was found to be a potentially revolutionary alternative for cholecystectomy for the control of symptoms, definitive treatment, or bridging therapy until surgery is possible. Two endoscopic methods have been established using either the trans‐mural or trans‐papillary drainage approach. Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided GB drainage (EUS‐GBD; trans‐mural approach) is a novel technique that allows stent placement between the GB and duodenum or stomach via fistula track, effectively enabling GB drainage. For endoscopic trans‐papillary GB drainage (ETGBD; trans‐papillary approach), attempts of selective cannulation to the cystic duct should be made to place the stent in the same manner as an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In comparison, EUS‐GBD has higher clinical success and lower recurrence rates than ETGBD due to the use of larger‐caliber stents, which allow for effective drainage when performed by skilled practitioners at high‐volume centers. Advantages of ETGBD over EUS‐GBD include more affordable costs and physiologic drainage, which preserves naive anatomy for possible future cholecystectomy. Although the field of endoscopic treatment for AC is rapidly advancing, important questions regarding which method improves clinical outcomes and safety more effectively remain unaddressed. Herein, the current status of endoscopic treatment for AC, including a technical review on clinical outcomes, adverse events, and advantages and disadvantages of each technique are reviewed, as well as other future prospects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Reports of the rendezvous technique via percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage are very rare because of difficulties with insertion of the guidewire from the gallbladder into the common bile duct. In particular, our report includes a case with distal common bile duct stricture. To our knowledge, such a case has never been previously reported. Reports of the rendezvous technique via percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage are very rare because of difficulties with insertion of the guidewire from the gallbladder into the common bile duct. In particular, our report includes a case with distal common bile duct stricture. To our knowledge, such a case has never been previously reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions provide easy access to structures adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract, effectively targeting them for therapeutic purposes. They play an important role in the management of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) and bile duct (BD) and pancreatic duct (PD) drainage in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or gallbladder (GB) drainage. Specially designed stents and delivery systems for EUS-guided transluminal interventions allow various new applications and improve the efficacy and safety of these procedures. In fact, EUS-guided drainage has emerged as the treatment of choice for the management of PFC, and recent innovations such as fully covered metal stents (including lumen-apposing metal stents) have improved outcomes in patients with walled-off necrosis. Similarly, EUS-guided BD and PD drainage with specially designed stents can be beneficial for patients with failed ERCP due to an inaccessible papilla, gastric outlet obstruction, or surgically altered anatomy. EUS-guided GB drainage is also performed using dedicated stents in patients with acute cholecystitis who are not fit for surgery. Although the field of dedicated stents for interventional EUS is rapidly advancing with increasing innovations, the debate on the most appropriate stent for EUS-guided drainage has resurfaced. Furthermore, some important questions remain unaddressed, such as which stent improves clinical outcomes and safety in EUS-guided drainage. Herein, the current status and problems of the available stents are reviewed, including the applicable indications, long-term clinical outcomes, comparison between each stent, and their future prospects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]