Search

The genomic basis of ageing still remains unknown despite being a topic of study for many years. Here, we present data from 20 experimentally evolved laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster that have undergone two different life-history selection regimes. One set of ten populations demonstrates early ageing whereas the other set of ten populations shows postponed ageing. Additionally, both types of populations consist of five long standing populations and five recently derived populations. Our primary goal was to determine which genes exhibit changes in expression levels by comparing the female transcriptome of the two population sets at two different time points. Using three different sets of increasingly restrictive criteria, we found that 2.1-15.7% (82-629 genes) of the expressed genes are associated with differential ageing between population sets. Conversely, a comparison of recently derived populations to long-standing populations reveals little to no transcriptome differentiation, suggesting that the recent selection regime has had a larger impact on the transcriptome than its more distant evolutionary history. In addition, we found very little evidence for significant enrichment for functional attributes regardless of the set of criteria used. Relative to previous ageing studies, we find little overlap with other lists of aging related genes. The disparity between our results and previously published results is likely due to the high replication used in this study coupled with our use of highly differentiated populations. Our results reinforce the notion that the use of genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic data to uncover the genetic basis of a complex trait like ageing can benefit from experimental designs that use highly replicated, experimentally-evolved populations.

Background: Studies combining experimental evolution and next-generation sequencing have found that adaptation in sexually reproducing populations is primarily fueled by standing genetic variation. Consequently, the response to selection is rapid and highly repeatable across replicate populations. Some studies suggest that the response to selection is highly repeatable at both the phenotypic and genomic levels, and that evolutionary history has little impact. Other studies suggest that even when the response to selection is repeatable phenotypically, evolutionary history can have significant impacts at the genomic level. Here we test two hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. Hypothesis 1: Past intense selection reduces evolutionary repeatability at the genomic and phenotypic levels when conditions change. Hypothesis 2: Previous intense selection does not reduce evolutionary repeatability, but other evolutionary mechanisms may. We test these hypotheses using D. melanogaster populations that were subjected to 260 generations of intense selection for desiccation resistance and have since been under relaxed selection for the past 230 generations., Results: We find that, with the exception of longevity and to a lesser extent fecundity, 230 generations of relaxed selection has erased the extreme phenotypic differentiation previously found. We also find no signs of genetic fixation, and only limited evidence of genetic differentiation between previously desiccation resistance selected populations and their controls., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that evolution in our system is highly repeatable even when populations have been previously subjected to bouts of extreme selection. We therefore conclude that evolutionary repeatability can overcome past bouts of extreme selection in Drosophila experimental evolution, provided experiments are sufficiently long and populations are not inbred.

Experimental evolutionary genomics now allows biologists to test fundamental theories concerning the genetic basis of adaptation. We have conducted one of the longest laboratory evolution experiments with any sexually-reproducing metazoan, Drosophila melanogaster. We used next-generation resequencing data from this experiment to examine genome-wide patterns of genetic variation over an evolutionary time-scale that approaches 1,000 generations. We also compared measures of variation within and differentiation between our populations to simulations based on a variety of evolutionary scenarios. Our analysis yielded no clear evidence of hard selective sweeps, whereby natural selection acts to increase the frequency of a newly-arising mutation in a population until it becomes fixed. We do find evidence for selection acting on standing genetic variation, as independent replicate populations exhibit similar population-genetic dynamics, without obvious fixation of candidate alleles under selection. A hidden-Markov model test for selection also found widespread evidence for selection. We found more genetic variation genome-wide, and less differentiation between replicate populations genome-wide, than arose in any of our simulated evolutionary scenarios., Competing Interests: A.D.L., M.R.R., L.F.G., C.L.R., K.C.M., L.D.M. and B.V. all have financial interests in Genescient Inc., which provided funding for this project. M.A.P., Z.S.G. and M.K.B. have no competing interests. M.R.R. also has a financial interest in two additional companies, Methuselah Flies LLC and Lyceum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.