Search

DrugCentral is a public resource (http://drugcentral.org) that serves the scientific community by providing up-to-date drug information, as described in previous papers. The current release includes 109 newly approved (October 2018 through March 2020) active pharmaceutical ingredients in the US, Europe, Japan and other countries; and two molecular entities (e.g. mefuparib) of interest for COVID19. New additions include a set of pharmacokinetic properties for ∼1000 drugs, and a sex-based separation of side effects, processed from FAERS (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System); as well as a drug repositioning prioritization scheme based on the market availability and intellectual property rights forFDA approved drugs. In the context of the COVID19 pandemic, we also incorporated REDIAL-2020, a machine learning platform that estimates anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities, as well as the 'drugs in news' feature offers a brief enumeration of the most interesting drugs at the present moment. The full database dump and data files are available for download from the DrugCentral web portal., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)

Generative topographic mapping was used to investigate the possibility to diversify the in-house compounds collection of Boehringer Ingelheim (BI). For this purpose, a 2D map covering the relevant chemical space was trained, and the BI compound library was compared to the Aldrich-Market Select (AMS) database of more than 8M purchasable compounds. In order to discover new (sub)structures, the "AutoZoom" tool was developed and applied in order to analyze chemotypes of molecules residing in heavily populated zones of a map and to extract the corresponding maximum common substructures. A set of 401K new structures from the AMS database was retrieved and checked for drug-likeness and biological activity.

Background and Objective: Drug-target interaction prediction plays an intrinsic role in the drug discovery process. Prediction of novel drugs and targets helps in identifying optimal drug therapies for various stringent diseases. Computational prediction of drug-target interactions can help to identify potential drug-target pairs and speed-up the process of drug repositioning. In our present, work we have focused on machine learning algorithms for predicting drug-target interactions from the pool of existing drug-target data. The key idea is to train the classifier using existing DTI so as to predict new or unknown DTI. However, there are various challenges such as class imbalance and high dimensional nature of data that need to be addressed before developing optimal drug-target interaction model., Methods: In this paper, we propose a bagging based ensemble framework named BE-DTI' for drug-target interaction prediction using dimensionality reduction and active learning to deal with class-imbalanced data. Active learning helps to improve under-sampling bagging based ensembles. Dimensionality reduction is used to deal with high dimensional data., Results: Results show that the proposed technique outperforms the other five competing methods in 10-fold cross-validation experiments in terms of AUC=0.927, Sensitivity=0.886, Specificity=0.864, and G-mean=0.874., Conclusion: Missing interactions and new interactions are predicted using the proposed framework. Some of the known interactions are removed from the original dataset and their interactions are recalculated to check the accuracy of the proposed framework. Moreover, validation of the proposed approach is performed using the external dataset. All these results show that structurally similar drugs tend to interact with similar targets., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The productivity of the pharmaceutical industry has been widely discussed in recent years, particularly with regard to concerns that substantial expenditures on research and development have failed to translate into approved drugs. Various analyses of this productivity challenge have focused on aspects such as attrition rates at particular clinical phases or the physicochemical properties of drug candidates, but relatively little attention has been paid to how the industry has performed from the standpoint of the choice of therapeutic mechanisms and their intended indications. This article examines what the pharmaceutical industry has achieved in this respect by analysing comprehensive industry-wide data on the mechanism-indication pairs that have been investigated during the past 20 years. Our findings indicate several points and trends that we hope will be useful in understanding and improving the productivity of the industry, including areas in which the industry has had substantial success or failure and the relative extent of novelty in completed and ongoing projects.

We present a computational strategy to simulate drug treatment in a personalized setting. The method is based on integrating patient mutation and differential expression data with a protein-protein interaction network. We test the impact of in-silico deletions of different proteins on the flow of information in the network and use the results to infer potential drug targets. We apply our method to AML data from TCGA and validate the predicted drug targets using known targets. To benchmark our patient-specific approach, we compare the personalized setting predictions to those of the conventional setting. Our predicted drug targets are highly enriched with known targets from DrugBank and COSMIC (p < 10(-5) outperforming the non-personalized predictions. Finally, we focus on the largest AML patient subgroup (~30%) which is characterized by an FLT3 mutation, and utilize our prediction score to rank patient sensitivity to inhibition of each predicted target, reproducing previous findings of in-vitro experiments.

A number of supervised machine learning models have recently been introduced for the prediction of drug-target interactions based on chemical structure and genomic sequence information. Although these models could offer improved means for many network pharmacology applications, such as repositioning of drugs for new therapeutic uses, the prediction models are often being constructed and evaluated under overly simplified settings that do not reflect the real-life problem in practical applications. Using quantitative drug-target bioactivity assays for kinase inhibitors, as well as a popular benchmarking data set of binary drug-target interactions for enzyme, ion channel, nuclear receptor and G protein-coupled receptor targets, we illustrate here the effects of four factors that may lead to dramatic differences in the prediction results: (i) problem formulation (standard binary classification or more realistic regression formulation), (ii) evaluation data set (drug and target families in the application use case), (iii) evaluation procedure (simple or nested cross-validation) and (iv) experimental setting (whether training and test sets share common drugs and targets, only drugs or targets or neither). Each of these factors should be taken into consideration to avoid reporting overoptimistic drug-target interaction prediction results. We also suggest guidelines on how to make the supervised drug-target interaction prediction studies more realistic in terms of such model formulations and evaluation setups that better address the inherent complexity of the prediction task in the practical applications, as well as novel benchmarking data sets that capture the continuous nature of the drug-target interactions for kinase inhibitors., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press.)