Search

Background: Since their first approval 25 years ago, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become important targeted cancer therapeutics. However, dermatologic toxicities associated with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor (non-ICI) mAbs may complicate the course of cancer treatment. Data on the incidence and types of these reactions are limited., Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted on dermatologic toxicities associated with different classes of non-ICI mAbs approved for treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The review included prospective Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials; retrospective literature reviews; systematic reviews/meta-analyses; and case series/reports., Results: Dermatologic toxicities were associated with several types of non-ICI mAbs. Inflammatory reactions were the most common dermatologic toxicities, manifesting as maculopapular, urticarial, papulopustular/acneiform, and lichenoid/interface cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) with non-ICI mAbs. Immunobullous reactions were rare and a subset of non-ICI mAbs were associated with the development of vitiligo cAEs., Conclusion: Dermatologic toxicities of non-ICI mAbs are diverse and mostly limited to inflammatory reactions. Awareness of the spectrum of the histopathologic patterns of cAE from non-ICI mAbs therapy is critical in the era of oncodermatology and oncodermatopathology., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Advances in molecular biology and genetics have contributed to breakthrough treatments directed at specific pathways associated with the development of cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors (Nibs) aimed at a variety of cellular pathways have been efficacious; however, they are associated with significant dermatologic toxicities., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of dermatologic toxicities associated with Nibs categorized into the following five groups: (a) mitogen-activated protein kinase; (b) growth factor/multi-tyrosine kinase; (c) cell division/DNA repair; (d) signaling associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms; and (e) other signaling pathways. Prospective phase I, II, or III clinical trials, retrospective literature reviews, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and case reviews/reports were included for analysis., Results: Dermatologic toxicities reviewed were associated with every class of Nibs and ranged from mild to severe or life-threatening adverse skin reactions. Inflammatory reactions manifesting as maculopapular, papulopustular/acneiform, and eczematous lesions were frequent types of dermatologic toxicities seen with Nibs. Squamous cell carcinoma with keratoacanthoma-like features was associated with a subset of Nibs. Substantial overlap in dermatologic toxicities was found between Nibs., Conclusions: Dermatologic toxicities from Nibs are diverse and may overlap between classes of Nibs. Recognition of the various types of toxicities from Nibs is critical for patient care in the era of "oncodermatology/dermatopathology.", (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: An increasing number of cutaneous adverse reactions resulting from use of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been described, but with relatively little focus to date on the timing of these reactions., Objective: To determine the timing of cutaneous drug reactions after initiation of PD-1 inhibitor therapy., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational study included patients referred to an academic dermatology clinic by an oncologist from January 1, 2014, through February 28, 2018, with at least 1 skin biopsy specimen of a skin reaction associated with PD-1 inhibitor use. Participants were included if they had a biopsy-proven cutaneous reaction in response to a PD-1 inhibitor used alone or in combination with ipilimumab., Exposures: All patients included in this study received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or nivolumab with ipilimumab as immunotherapy for cancer., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measure was time to onset of biopsy-proven cutaneous reactions that occurred during or after use of pembrolizumab or nivolumab., Results: A total of 17 patients (12 men, 5 women; mean [SD] age, 68.6 [11.1] years) were identified who presented with cutaneous adverse reactions associated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy; these reactions included lichenoid dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid, erythema multiforme, eczema, lupus, and sarcoidosis. Twelve patients presented with reactions at least 3 months after beginning pembrolizumab or nivolumab therapy. The skin reactions presented a median (range) of 4.2 months (0.5-38.0 months) after drug initiation. In 5 cases, the cutaneous adverse reactions attributed to the PD-1 inhibitor therapy developed after the drug therapy was terminated., Conclusions and Relevance: Diverse cutaneous adverse reactions secondary to PD-1 inhibitor use may present with delayed onsets and even after discontinuation of therapy. Dermatologists should be aware of the potential for delayed presentations of cutaneous adverse reactions.

The adverse effects of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin are primarily cutaneous. The majority of these cutaneous side effects manifest as palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, whereas few reports of other cutaneous reactions exist in the literature. The authors report a case of an exuberant follicular eruption in a patient treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. This case also highlights the potential mechanism underlying this unusual histological and clinical reaction.

Vemurafenib is a specific inhibitor of the V600E mutated BRAF protein kinase used for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma harboring this mutation. Multiple predictable side effects have been described with use of this targeted therapy, and implicate BRAF and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways in their pathogenesis. Herein, we report the novel finding of an interface dermatitis in radiation recall and a keratosis pilaris-like clinical reaction in a patient treated with vemurafenib., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)