Search

As part of the continuing national antimicrobial surveillance, the national antimicrobial resistance surveillance thailand (NARST), data of all clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected from 28 hospitals in Thailand from 2000 to 2005. Epidemiological and microbiological data were obtained and analyzed using the WHONET software program. Among all isolates tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, the rates of penicillin resistance were constantly high, ranging from 42.4% in 2000 to 47.7% in 2005. The third-generation cephalosporin resistance rate, determined by Epsilon test (E-test) in 10% to 15% of all isolates each year, ranged from 2.1% to 8.4%. The rates of erythromycin resistance ranged from 24.2% to 30.3%. Surprisingly, one isolate in 2005 was resistant to levofloxacin. The rates of multi-drug resistance ranged from 14.8% to 34.3%. In conclusion; the present (NARST) study documents remarkable increase of penicillin, erythromycin, and multi-drug resistance rates in Thailand, especially among isolates from the North, the Center, the East, and Bangkok; from university hospitals; from young children; and from non-sterile specimens.

In this overview, the authors summarize the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of important Gram-positive bacteria from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Thailand (NARST) program between 2000 and 2005 as well as the clinical implications. This collaborative network program was funded by the World Health Organization, and involved 33 hospitals throughout Thailand. There are rising trends of drug-resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP), ampicillin-resistant enterococci, but a constant occurrence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was noted during this period. The rates of penicillin and erythromycin resistances of S. pneumoniae were constantly high, ranging from 42.5% to 47.7% and 24.6% to 31.1%, respectively, whereas the rates of cefotaxime resistance were quite low, ranging from 2.1% to 8.4%. The rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. pneumoniae ranged from 14.8% to 34.3%. Of all S. aureus isolates, MRSA comprised 24% to 27%, and vancomycin resistance rates of these MRSA isolates ranged from 0.1% to 0.8%. The antimicrobial resistance rates of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates were very low. The rates of ampicillin and high-level gentamicin resistances of E. faecium from 2000 to 2005 have been significantly increasing from 52% to 84.1%, and from 46.9% to 75%, respectively, but vancomycin resistance was stable at the rates between 0.4% and 1.9%. In conclusions, antimicrobial resistance rates of important Gram-positive bacteria have been increasing in Thailand. All local, national, and international surveillance data will help to set the strategic plan for control and treatment of these resistant organisms. Appropriate and accurate microbiological procedures regarding the collection and transportation of clinical specimens as well as the identification of these emerging resistant organisms are urgently needed, in collaboration with other concerned sectors.

Objective: To determine the prevalence, clinical epidemiology, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Thailand from 2000 to 2005., Material and Method: Using WHONET data from 28 hospitals participating in the National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Thailand (NARST) program, all data were reviewed and analyzed for the prevalence, clinical epidemiology, and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from 2000 to 2005., Results: During the six-year surveillance, the prevalence of P. aeruginosa in clinical isolates was constant among 28 hospitals. The most common sites of isolation included sputum, pus, and urine. The most active antimicrobials were netilmicin (88% to 90.8%), cefoperazone/sulbactam (85.1% to 89.5%), imipenem (84.6% to 87.2%), and meropenem (84.5%). The resistance to ceftazidime was very high, ranging from 24.6-27.4%. The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa (resistance to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime) was constant. Some hospitals in Central and Eastern regions had the prevalence of MDR up to 20% to 30% of the isolates., Conclusion: According to NARST data, the antimicrobial resistance rates of P. aeruginosa remains constant with the exception of relatively high rates in ceftazidime. The prevalence of MDR P. aeruginosa is generally low with a moderately high prevalence in some hospitals.

Background: Much controversy exists as to whether cephalosporin treatment is appropriate for infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms because no randomized controlled studies have been performed., Objective: Evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of ceftriaxone treatment in acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis., Material and Method: The authors performed a prospective study in female patients hospitalized with acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing or ESBL-nonproducing E. coli, K. pneumoniae, or P. mirabilis in four hospitals in Thailand from 2004 to 2006. The clinical and microbiological outcomes were evaluated at 72 hours after empirical ceftriaxone treatment., Results: One hundred eleven patients with the mean age of 65.29 years participated in this study. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory data between the ESBL-producing and ESBL-nonproducing groups except the higher rates of previous antibiotic use and urinary tract infection; and the lower frequency of costovertebral angle tenderness in the ESBL-producing group. Both clinical (65% and 93%) and microbiological (67.5% and 100%) responses at 72 hours after ceftriaxone treatment were poorer in the ESBL-producing group than in the ESBL-nonproducing group (p < 0.0002)., Conclusion: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first prospective study to evaluate the outcomes of ceftriaxone treatment in acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The present study confirms that acute pyelonephritis in the female patients caused by ESBL-producing strains could not be treated with ceftriaxone.