Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has been profound impacts on mental and physical health of individuals with chronic diseases. Thus, it is important to understand the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on people living with HIV. We aimed to assess the association between COVID-19-related knowledge and worry, HIV-related health practices and outcomes, and adherence to precautions related to COVID-19, and possible associations of these factors with HIV treatment outcomes (ART adherence and viral load). A cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 2020 and February 2021 among 291 PLWH at two large university hospital HIV clinics in Izmir, Turkey. Additionally, the most recent HIV-RNA load, CD4 count was recorded using medical records. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of self-reported adherence to COVID-19-related precautions, ART adherence and undetectable viral load. COVID-19-related worry, COVID-19-related knowledge, and ART adherence were significant predictors of adherence to COVID-19-related precautions. Furthermore, adherence to COVID-19-related precautions was a significant predictor of both ART adherence and undetectable viral load. Findings provide a unique aspect of the interrelations of COVID and living with HIV. Since health behaviors and outcomes for COVID-19 and HIV seem to be interrelated, treatment practices and interventions that address these simultaneously may enhance their efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite efficacy in HIV prevention, Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is underutilized in the US, especially among populations at highest risk. PrEP-related stigma may play a role. We developed measures of PrEP-related stigma dimensions and PrEP adherence. We administered them to current PrEP users. We hypothesized that PrEP-related stigma would negatively impact PrEP adherence. Questionnaire measures were developed using data from previous qualitative work and existing validated HIV-related stigma measures. The resultant survey was administered to current PrEP users from two Birmingham, Alabama PrEP clinics. Plasma tenofovir disoproxil fumarate levels were collected to measure PrEP adherence. Exploratory factor analyses were performed to determine the factor structure of each PrEP-related stigma dimension (internalized, perceived, experienced, anticipated, disclosure concerns). Separate binary logistic (or linear) regressions were performed to assess associations between PrEP-related stigma dimensions and adherence (treatment adherence self-efficacy, self-reported adherence, and plasma tenofovir levels), adjusting for education, race, and time on PrEP. In 2018, 100 participants completed the survey, with 91 identifying as male and 66 as white. Only internalized stigma was associated with lower self-reported PrEP adherence. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested that the association between all stigma dimensions and self-reported PrEP adherence is mediated by PrEP adherence self-efficacy. No associations were found between any PrEP-related stigma measures and plasma tenofovir levels. Internalized PrEP stigma may reduce PrEP adherence, possibly by reducing PrEP adherence self-efficacy among experienced PrEP users. Further investigation of how stigma dimensions affect PrEP adherence in populations at risk for HIV may shed light on drivers of PrEP underutilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a lifesaving medical intervention that protects against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but to date, PrEP uptake has been limited. PrEP utilization and adherence among youth, including stigmatized and highly vulnerable young sexual and gender minorities, have been exceptionally low across all regions, leading to preventable HIV transmission. Considering the scientific value of measuring and understanding predictors or associations of PrEP adherence, our study team validated two scales: a PrEP Difficulties Scale and a PrEP Confidence Scale tested within the Adolescent Trials Network P3 study (2019–2021). Data from sexual and gender minorities who were prescribed PrEP across nine domestic sites were evaluated (N = 235). Descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, and correlation coefficients are reported herein. Results for the PrEP Difficulties Scale yielded a four-factor solution (Disclosure, Health Effects, Logistics, and Cost), and results for the PrEP Confidence Scale produced a three-factor solution (Scheduling, Distraction, and Planning). Factor loadings and Cronbach's alphas suggested good internal consistency for both scales. PrEP Confidence Scale subscales were correlated with PrEP adherence, and subscales of both scales were associated with dimensions of social support and PrEP-related stigma. Given the persistence of preventable HIV infections among key populations, multi-level barriers and facilitators to medication adherence, and expansion of PrEP modalities, the PrEP Difficulties Scale and PrEP Confidence Scale have the potential to enhance intervention, exploratory, and mechanistic HIV prevention research. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03320512. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIDS & Behavior is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

There is limited research on the effects of stigma on health outcomes among new-to-HIV care individuals. We examined the effect of changes in internalized stigma over time on health behaviors and outcomes such as viral suppression, antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, and visit adherence among new-to-HIV care individuals. We also analyzed the mediating effects of adherence self-efficacy and depressive symptoms in these associations. Participants were 186 persons living with HIV who initiated care at four HIV clinical sites in the United States and had diverse geographical and ethnic backgrounds. Baseline and 48-week follow-up assessments included measures of internalized stigma, ART adherence, depressive symptoms, and adherence self-efficacy. HIV visit adherence and viral load data were extracted from clinic records. Age, race, gender, insurance status, and site were controlled in all analyses. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of adherence and viral suppression. Change (decrease) in internalized stigma was calculated by subtracting follow-up internalized stigma scores from baseline scores and served as the main predictor. Mediation analyses included calculation of 95% confidence intervals for the indirect effects using bootstrapping. Decreases in internalized stigma over time were positively associated with viral suppression, ART adherence, and visit adherence. Adherence self-efficacy significantly mediated these effects of decrease in internalized stigma on all outcomes. Depressive symptoms only mediated the association between decrease in internalized stigma and ART adherence. Interventions that address internalized stigma and depressive symptoms, as well as adherence self-efficacy, may significantly improve adherence and viral suppression outcomes for individuals new to HIV care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resilience is defined as the ability and process to transform adversity into opportunities for growth and adaptation. Resilience may be especially important for people living with HIV (PLWH), who are susceptible to anxiety and depressive disorders, which are commonly linked to risk behaviors (i.e., alcohol and drug abuse), poor adherence to medical regimens, increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and related stigma and discrimination. To date, few studies have examined the impact of resilience on health-related behaviors and outcomes among PLWH, particularly among minority women living with HIV (WLWH) who are dealing with multiple stressors impacting their health. This study used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design to collect, analyze, and integrate qualitative and quantitative data from a subsample of WLWH enrolled in the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). The aims of the study were to (1) qualitatively examine the resilience perspectives of 76 marginalized WLWH, and; (2) quantitatively assess the associations of resilience with HIV health outcomes—adherence to antiretroviral therapy and viral suppression—in the context of differing levels of internalized HIV-related stigma and depressive symptoms (n = 420). Findings from this mixed-methods study suggest that resilience is an important resource that can aid WLWH in coping constructively with adversity by capitalizing on intrapersonal traits and states, interpersonal and institutional resources, and spiritual and/or religious practices. Given the complex medical and social needs of marginalized WLWH, intervention strategies should focus on mitigating psychosocial burdens of stigma and depression, in addition to building resilience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]