Search

This paper focuses on linearisation techniques for a class of mixed singular/continuous control problems and ensuing algorithms. The motivation comes from (re)insurance problems with reserve-dependent premiums with Cramér-Lundberg claims, by allowing singular dividend payments and capital injections. Using variational techniques and embedding the trajectories in an appropriate family of occupation measures, we provide the linearisation of such problems in which the continuous control is given by reinsurance policies and the singular one by dividends and capital injections. The linearisation translates into a dual dynamic programming (DDP) algorithm. An important part of the paper is dedicated to structural considerations allowing reasonable implementation. We also hint connections to methods relying on moment sum of squares and LMI (linear matrix inequality)-relaxations to approximate the optimal candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is intended as a companion to [12] and focuses on the numerical implementations of the method in the context of insurance problems with mixed controls: reinsurance acting as continuous control, and capital injection and dividend payment acting as singular ones. The aim is twofold. On the one hand, we provide a comparison of the output of our method in terms of the optimal value against two benchmarks. The first benchmark is provided by [4] in the no-reinsurance setting and when the claims are exponentially distributed. The second benchmark refers to [8] where capital injections are not permitted, but different claim distributions can be employed. On the other hand, we illustrate the improvement of the models in [8] when capital injection is allowed. We also look into the effect of reinsurance in the model [4]. Several cases for the equity cost parameter are discussed as are the boundary (or limit) situations. • We provide a validation of the Dual Linear Programming algorithm by showcasing its performance on two benchmarks. • With a relatively modest order of moments (4), the relative errors are of at most 3%. • Leveraging this algorithm reveals significant enhancements in the expected dividends, advocating for capital injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]