1. SUBSTITUTED SERVICE AND THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION.
- Author
-
Dodge, William S.
- Subjects
Affiliated corporations -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Subsidiary corporations -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Summons -- Management -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Civil procedure -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Foreign corporations -- Subsidiaries, divisions and units -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Public officers -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Due process of law -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Notice (Law) -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust (339 U.S. 306 (1950)) ,Government regulation ,Company business management ,Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters ,Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1)) - Abstract
Table of Contents Introduction 1488 I. The Hague Service Convention 1491 II. Notice Under the Due Process Clauses 1494 III. Substituted Service on Affiliated Companies 1498 IV. Substituted Service on [...], State law plays a surprisingly large role in transnational litigation, and how it defines the applicability of the Hague Service Convention is an important example. In Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Convention does not apply when, under state law, service of process is made within the United States. In Schlunk, Illinois law permitted substituted service on the U.S. subsidiary of a foreign parent company, so the Convention did not apply. This Article looks at substituted service under state law today and when it permits avoidance of the Hague Convention. The Article focuses on two kinds of substituted service that many states permit: (1) substituted service on affiliated companies; and (2) substituted service on state officials. The Article argues that states should liberalize their rules for substituted service on affiliated companies by focusing on whether service on the affiliate provides adequate notice to the defendant rather than on whether there are grounds to pierce the corporate veil, as many states currently do. The Article further argues that when substituted service is made on a state official, the Due Process Clauses require that a copy of the service be sent abroad, making the Hague Convention applicable.
- Published
- 2022