Search

Background: It has been shown that exposure in intense exposure in swine barn facilities is associated with increased respiratory symptoms and reduction in pulmonary functions. This study investigated if systemic response could be predicted by FEV(1) response following swine barn exposure., Methods: Naïve males were tested at baseline, low and high endotoxin and dust levels. Subjects were classified as "more responsive" (n = 9) or "less responsive" (n = 11) based on FEV(1) reduction following high endotoxin exposure. Health measures included pulmonary function testing, blood samples and nasal lavage. Environmental samples were collected from the barn., Results: White blood cells and blood lymphocytes at low exposure were significantly greater in those who were "more responsive" compared to those who were "less responsive". There was a significant increase in blood lymphocytes, serum IL6, total nasal lavage cells and nasal IL8 at high exposure among "more responsive" subjects compared to "less responsive" subjects., Conclusions: Respiratory response to high-level endotoxin and dust exposure predicts evidence of inflammatory response throughout a range of endotoxin and dust exposures.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess respiratory outcomes and environmental exposure levels of workers in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations., Methods: Poultry operations were evaluated for total dust, endotoxin, and ammonia, and respiratory symptoms and lung function tests of workers were conducted., Results: Workers in floor-housed poultry operations had significantly greater exposures to total dust and ammonia, whereas workers from cage-housed poultry operations reported greater frequency of current and chronic symptoms overall and significantly greater current and chronic phlegm (39% vs 18% and 40% vs 11%, respectively). Endotoxin concentration (EU/mg) was a significant predictor (P = 0.05) of chronic phlegm for all poultry workers., Conclusions: Greater endotoxin concentration in the presence of significantly lower total dust, in conjunction with greater respiratory symptoms in workers from cage-housed poultry operations, as compared with workers from floor-housed poultry operations, appears to indicate that differences in environmental exposures may impact respiratory outcomes of workers.

The negative health effects of exposure to grain dust have previously been examined, but few studies have observed the effects on newly hired employees. Young grain workers are of interest because changes in pulmonary function may occur after a short duration of employment, and because older grain workers may represent a survivor population. The New Grain Workers Study (NGWS), a longitudinal study of 299 newly hired male grain industry workers, was conducted between 1980 and 1985. The objectives were to determine the effects of employment in the grain industry on pulmonary function. Pre-employment physical examinations and pulmonary function tests were conducted on subjects at the Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan. The Grain Dust Medical Surveillance Program (GDMSP) was a Labour Canada program that began in 1978. All subjects were grain workers employed in the grain industry in Saskatchewan. All subjects completed a respiratory symptoms questionnaire and underwent pulmonary function testing. Baseline observations were recorded every three years between 1978 and 1993. Data were available on 2184 grain workers. Generalized estimating equations were used to fit marginal and transitional multivariable regression models to determine the effects of grain dust exposure on pulmonary function. Marginal and transitional models were then compared. Height, exposure weeks, and previous FVC were predictive of FVC in the NGWS, while exposure weeks and previous FEV1 were predictive of FEV1. These models, as well as a transitional regression model built using the GDMSP data, were used to compute predicted mean annual decline inpulmonary function. Non-smoking grain workers in the NGWS had the highest pulmonary function test values, but also had the greatest predicted annual decline in pulmonary function. Ever-smoking grain workers in the GDMSP had the lowest pulmonary function test values. Non-smoking grain workers in the GDMSP had the least predicted annual decline in pulmonary function.

A crossover trial was conducted to evaluate the acute human health effects of a dust control technology in a swine confinement facility. Twenty lifetime nonsmoking male subjects, with no evidence of allergy or asthma and no previous swine barn exposure, participated in the study, which included a laboratory session (baseline), 5-h exposure in a swine room sprinkled with canola oil (treatment) and 5-h exposure in a traditional swine room (control). Mean values of inhalable dust concentrations and endotoxin levels in the control room were significantly greater than those observed in the treatment room. Mean shift changes in FEV1 from preexposure to end of exposure were 1.1% (standard error, 0.63%) on baseline day, -1.9% (0.63%) on treatment day, and -9.9% (1.12%) on control day; the differences in the shift changes were statistically significant. Mean value of methacholine concentration that reduced the FEV1 by 20% (PC20) in bronchoprovocation tests on baseline day was significantly different from that on treatment day (p = 0.04) and that on control day (p < 0.001). Significant increases were also observed in white blood cell counts and nasal lavage cell counts on the control day in comparison with the other two days. Blood neutrophil counts after control room exposure were twice those observed on baseline and after exposure to the treatment room. Significant differences were also observed in IL-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-8 nasal lavage cytokines and in IL-6 serum cytokine. These results suggest that the canola oil dust control method is effective in improving indoor air quality in swine barns and reducing acute health effects in naive healthy subjects.

Exposure to swine confinement buildings has a negative impact on respiratory health. A short exposure to this environment results in an acute airway inflammatory response. The present study was performed to confirm and further define the acute effects of working in a swine building, and to determine whether these effects are reproducible. Seven previously nonexposed normal subjects underwent evaluations that included hourly measurement of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), methacholine challenge (the provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), nasal lavage (NL), and blood analyses, before (control) and after each of two 5 h exposures to a swine building environment. The exposures were conducted 8 days apart. The levels of total dust, endotoxins, and ammonia (NH3) in the confinement building were measured on each day of exposure. Both exposures resulted in a significant reduction in FEV1 (mean+/-SEM change in FEV1: control = 7+/-2%; exposure 1 = 15+/-3%; exposure 2 = 23+/-3%), decrease in PC20 (median value (25th-75th percentile): 223 (23-256), 20 (15-198) and 20 (11-71), respectively; p=0.05) and increase in BAL cells (129+/-20, 451+/-43 and 511+/-103x10(3) cells x mL(-1), respectively) and NL cells (6+/-4, 126+/-58 and 103+/-26x10(3) cells x mL(-1), respectively), mostly neutrophils. Levels of interleukin-8 (IL-8), but not interleukin-1 (IL-1) or tumour necrosis factors (TNF-alpha), increased both in BAL and nasal fluids with exposure. In normal naive subjects, repeated exposure to the environment of a swine building induced a marked and reproducible reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second, increase in airway responsiveness, and increased neutrophilic inflammatory response. These results could not be accounted for by any of the environmental factors measured.

Objective: To assess the appropriateness of the current Canadian standards for exposure to grain dust in the workplace., Options: The current permissible exposure limit of 10 mg of total grain dust per cubic metre of air (expressed as mg/m3) as an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure, or a lower permissible exposure limit., Outcomes: Acute symptoms of grain-dust exposure, such as cough, phlegm production, wheezing and dyspnea, similar chronic symptoms, and spirometric deficits revealing obstructive or restrictive disease., Evidence: Articles published from 1924 to December 1993 were identified from Index Medicus and the bibliographies of pertinent articles. Subsequent articles published from 1994 (when the recommendations were approved by the Canadian Thoracic Society Standards Committee) to June 1996 were retrieved through a search of MEDLINE, and modification of the recommendations was not found to be necessary. Studies of interest were those that linked measurements of total grain dust levels to the development of acute and chronic respiratory symptoms and changes in lung function in exposed workers. Papers on the effects of grain dust on workers in feed mills were not included because other nutrients such as animal products may have been added to the grain. Unpublished reports (e.g., to Labour Canada) were included as sources of information., Values: A high value was placed on minimizing the biological harm that grain dust has on the lungs of grain workers., Benefits, Harms and Costs: A permissible exposure limit of 5 mg/m3 would control the short-term effects of exposure to grain dust on workers. Evidence is insufficient to determine what level is needed to prevent long-term effects. The economic implications of implementing a lower permissible exposure limit have not been evaluated., Recommendations: The current Canadian standards for grain-dust exposure should be reviewed by Labour Canada and the grain industry. A permissible exposure level of 5 mg/m3 is recommended to control short-term effects. Further measurements that link the levels of exposure to respiratory health effects in workers across Canada should be collected to establish an exposure-response relation and possible regional differences in the effects of grain dust., Validation: There has been no external review of these recommendations. However, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists has recommended an 8-hour average exposure limit of 4 mg/m3 for wheat, oats and barley.

We conducted a cohort analysis of longitudinal changes in pulmonary function test values in male grain elevator workers in five regions of Canada over a 6-yr period involving three observations. Pulmonary function tests were obtained approximately each 3 yr during an observation interval called a "cycle". The periods of the cycles were 1978-81 (Cycle I), 1981-84 (Cycle II), and 1984-87 (Cycle III), respectively. Data on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function tests were collected on the same 881 workers in Cycles I and II (mean ages +/- SE: 37.0 +/- 0.48 yr at Cycle I), on the same 1,294 workers in Cycles I, II, and III (34.6 +/- 0.34 yr at Cycle I), and on the same 1,021 workers in Cycles II and III (33.9 +/- 0.38 yr at Cycle II) for a total of 3,196 workers with two or more observations over the 6-yr period. The proportion of current smokers decreased from Cycle I to Cycle III. Autoregression analysis of longitudinal changes in lung function data showed that predictors of FEV1 were height, years in the industry, smoking status, and geographic region. The mean annual losses in FEV1 (FVC) were 28.7 ml (26.4 ml), 38.4 ml (41.9 ml), and 41.7 ml (32.3 ml) for nonsmokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers, respectively. The annual loss of FEV1 (FVC) was 9.2 ml (21.1 ml) for those who were in the grain industry for less than 5 yr and 52.6 ml (60.8 ml) for those who were exposed for 20 yr or more.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We conducted an assessment of respiratory health status including questionnaire and spirographic measurements in 54 male swine producers age 36.3 +/- 11.1 years (mean +/- SD) who worked an average of 10.7 +/- 6.3 years in the industry and spent 4.7 +/- 2.1 hours per day in the swine barns, and we also measured atmospheric contaminants including carbon dioxide, ammonia, total dust, respirable dust, and airborne endotoxin. Mean atmospheric dust contaminant levels were as follows: carbon dioxide, 2632 +/- 807 ppm; ammonia, 11.3 +/- 4.2 ppm; total dust, 2.93 +/- 0.92 mg/m3; respirable dust, 0.13 +/- 0.05 mg/m3; and endotoxin, 11,332 +/- 13,492 endotoxin units/m3. Of these, endotoxin related to forced vital capacity (P < .05) and endotoxin x hours per day was related to forced vital capacity (P < .05) and to forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = .06). Respiratory symptoms and lung function studies did not relate to categories of low, medium, and high exposure to respirable dust. However, categories of endotoxin (available on 46 workers) related to respiratory symptoms (cough, P = .02; chronic bronchitis, P = .06; and to forced vital capacity, P < .01). These data suggest that respiratory health status relates to endotoxin levels but not to dust level exposures in the presence of low dust levels and indicates that control measures should include endotoxin as well as dust control.

Several years of drought have contributed to the desiccation of Old Wives Lake, a shallow, alkaline lake in southern Saskatchewan. The prevailing northwest wind, which blows across the 177-km2 dry lake bed, has generated airborne sodium sulfate, silt, and clay. Residents have reported nasal, eye, and respiratory irritation. A cross-sectional design that included 300 controls and 300 exposed subjects elucidated the potential adverse respiratory health effects of exposure to blowing alkali salt and dust. An increased prevalence of current cough, current wheeze, chronic cough, chronic wheeze, chronic eye irritation, and chronic nasal irritation was identified in the exposed population. Smoking-adjusted odds ratios were consistent with the prevalence ratios. Lung function did not differ between the exposed and the control populations. Rainfall during the study period reduced airborne dust levels and may have precluded demonstration of previously reported adverse effects.

Prospective study of 164 young men from the start of employment in grain elevators showed that of those seen at the initial evaluation of respiratory state only 30% were available for a complete four year follow up. The drop out of subjects could represent a health related selection leading to the underestimation of respiratory effects of exposure to grain dust as assessed in the survivor group. This hypothesis was examined by comparisons of longitudinal changes in lung function in four groups defined by the duration of follow up involving the initial examination and periodic evaluations after one, two, and four years of work. Sixty four men were tested only on the initial examination (group I), 18 underwent two (group II), 31 underwent three (group III), and 51 (group IV) all four examinations. The groups had similar mean ages (range: 19.4-20.1 years), mean duration of previous exposure to grain dust (range: 8-13 weeks), smoking habits, lung function, and prevalences of respiratory symptoms evaluated on the initial occasion. The average decline in lung function over the first year was associated with duration of follow up. The annual decline in FVC (ml) was 58 in group II, 41 in group III and -55 (increase) in group IV; the decline in FEV1 (ml) was 224, 130, and 70 respectively. The differences for the annual declines of FEV1, FEF25-759 Vmax509 and Vmax25 were significant between groups II and IV, and the FEF25-759 Vmax509 and Vmax25 differed significantly between groups II and III. The results show that the restriction of analysis to the survivors may underestimate the relation between work and respiratory impairment.

We conducted allergy skin-prick testing on 207 young cereal grain workers within 0.27 years of the commencement of their employment in the grain industry and again after 1.34 years of employment on 124 workers. We also studied 120 control subjects on the first observation and 105 on the second observation. Grain workers had lower prevalence than did the controls of positive skin tests on the first observation, and this difference increased by the second observation. Respiratory symptoms were more frequent among grain workers with positive skin tests who dropped out of the industry than among those who stayed in the industry. We conclude that atopic status may be a factor in job selection and drop out decision making and may be a factor explaining the healthy worker effect.

Grain dust has a long history of association with disease, and its effects on various organs have been reported for many years. Inflammatory diseases of the eyes, nose, and skin may be caused by both direct irritation and immune-based reactions. The lung and airways frequently suffer adverse effects. Asthma is well documented as being a result of exposure. Several studies show increased incidences of respiratory symptoms and of reduced pulmonary function in grain workers. Grain dust should be regarded as a dust with toxic properties, not just a nuisance dust.

We measured nonspecific bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine in 26 lifetime nonsmoking grain handlers and 29 lifetime nonsmoking unexposed control subjects matched for age, sex and specific conductance. Routine lung function tests revealed a total lung capacity that was higher in control subjects than in workers (P less than 0.05) with no difference in other subdivisions of lung volume, or expiratory flow rates between the two groups. An index of allergy was significantly greater in the control subjects than in the grain workers (P less than 0.01). None of the grain handlers was sensitive to grain dust by history or by skin tests. Respiratory symptoms (cough, sputum, dyspnea, or wheezing) were more prevalent in the grain workers than in controls (P less than 0.05). The mean concentration of histamine required to reduce the specific conductance by 35 percent was 4.5 +/- 2.0 mg/ml in grain workers and 5.9 +/- 3.0 mg/ml in controls (P less than 0.05). Chronic exposure to grain dust in nonallergic individuals appears to be associated with both increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms and increased nonspecific bronchial reactivity when compared to nonexposed control subjects.

51.4% of 1,954 grain elevator workers surveyed in 1978 and 1979 complained of pruritus following exposure to grain dusts. 95% of 796 grain elevator workers surveyed in 1985 noted that pruritus following exposure to grain dust was of short duration. Exposure to barley dust and oat dust provoked the greatest number of complaints. Those with a past history of infantile eczema were significantly more likely to complain. Younger workers were more likely to complain than older workers. 13.1% of those surveyed in 1985 complained of a rash following exposure, in 35% of whom it lasted more than 1 day. Nasal congestion, ocular and oropharyngeal irritation were also frequent complaints.

Exposure of mice to grain dust in a dusting chamber for 2-80 days led to a pulmonary macrophage response but no interstitial pulmonary damage. The macrophages contained prominent paracrystalline cytoplasmic inclusions.

In four groups of individually-matched subjects (nonsmoking grain workers, smoking grain workers, nonsmoking community controls, and smoking community controls) we measured pulmonary function variables from the spirogram, from the maximal expiratory flow-volume curve breathing air and helium, and from the single breath nitrogen test as well as symptom prevalences from a questionnaire in order to assess the relative effects of smoking and occupational exposure to grain dust in Saskatchewan country grain elevators. There were similar increased prevalences of respiratory symptoms and reductions in pulmonary function associated with either grain dust exposure or smoking, but the effects of smoking were slightly more pronounced. The combined effects of grain dust and smoking on lung function appeared to be additive except in the least exposed workers (five years or less) where a synergistic effect was observed in tests of peripheral airways dysfunction.

Over 94% of the workers in each of four Saskatchewan potash mines participated in a respiratory health surveillance program that included a questionnaire and pulmonary function tests. Compared with a nonexposed control group, potash workers had higher prevalences of cough, dyspnea, and chronic bronchitis but better pulmonary function. Prevalences of symptoms and pulmonary function abnormalities were similar among workers at the four mines tested and at the various job locations. Potash dust, diesel fumes, and other air contaminants may have an irritant effect that leads to the increased prevalences of cough and chronic bronchitis. Although we found no adverse effects of the potash mine environment on pulmonary function, these findings reflect a healthy worker effect or some selection process that makes the potash workers appear healthier in a cross-sectional study.