Search

Introduction: Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) previously demonstrated reduction in total daily OFF from baseline by over 4 hours in advanced Parkinson’s disease patients across 54 weeks. Evidence on CLES’s long-term effectiveness on patterns of motor-symptom control throughout the day remains limited. Methods: We present post-hoc analyses of a large, open-label study of CLES monotherapy (N = 289). Diary data recorded patients’ motor states at 30-minute intervals over 3 days at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 54. Adjusted generalized linear mixed models assessed changes from baseline at each timepoint for four outcome measures: time to ON without troublesome dyskinesia (ON-woTD) after waking, motor-symptom control as measured by motor states’ durations throughout the day, number of motor-state transitions, and presence of extreme fluctuations (OFF to ON with TD). Results: Patients demonstrated short-term (wk4) and sustained (wk54) improvement in all outcomes compared to baseline. At weeks 4 and 54, patients were more likely to reach ON-woTD over the course of their day (HR: 1.86 and 2.51, both P

Introduction: A clinical trial in advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) has established the superiority of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) in reducing total patient "off" time (OFF) and increasing total "on" time without troublesome dyskinesia (ON-woTD) over orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa tablets (IR–CL). However, temporal patterns of these improvements throughout the waking day have not been examined. In this analysis, time to ON-woTD after waking and patterns of motor-symptom control throughout the waking day were compared between CLES and IR–CL. Methods: Post hoc analyses of APD patient-diary data from the phase 3 randomized controlled trial were used to compare changes in time to ON-woTD after waking, motor-symptom control throughout the waking day, occurrence of extreme fluctuations between OFF and "on" with troublesome dyskinesia, and motor-state transitions with CLES versus IR–CL from baseline to week 12. Results: The sample included 33 CLES-treated and 30 IR–CL-treated patients. Among the CLES group, the percentage of patient days achieving ON-woTD within 30 min of waking was three times higher at week 12 versus baseline (33% vs. 11%, p = 0.0043); no significant change occurred with IR–CL. When the waking day was divided into four 4-h periods, CLES versus IR–CL treatment produced significantly greater reductions in OFF during three periods, and two periods had increased ON-woTD. Fewer CLES-treated patients had extreme fluctuations at week 12 (3% vs. 23%, p = 0.0224) compared to IR–CL-treated patients. From baseline to week 12, CLES-treated patients had greater reductions in the average number of motor-state transitions compared to IR–CL-treated patients (− 1.6, p = 0.0295). Conclusion: CLES-treated patients experienced a more rapid onset of ON-woTD after waking and greater consistency of ON-woTD throughout their waking day than IR–CL-treated patients. Plain Language Summary: In advanced Parkinson's disease, patients' motor-symptom states (such as "on" time without troublesome dyskinesia [good "on" time] and "off" time), and the timing at which they occur, can impact patients' quality of life and ability to complete activities of daily living. Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension is administered continuously into the jejunum, potentially reducing some of the motor-state variation that is common with orally administered carbidopa/levodopa, including delayed "on" time after waking and transitions between "off" and "on" throughout the day. In post hoc analyses of clinical trial data, patterns of motor-states across the waking day were compared between carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension and orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa at week 12. Outcomes included time to good "on" after waking; occurrence of extreme fluctuations between "off" time and "on" time with troublesome dyskinesia; time in each motor-state during 4-h intervals across the day; and frequency of motor-state transitions. Three times as many carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension-treated patients achieved good "on" within 30 min of waking after 12 weeks versus baseline, whereas no significant change was observed for the orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa group. Compared to orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa-treated patients, fewer carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension-treated patients experienced extreme fluctuations, had greater reductions in motor-state transitions, and greater reductions in duration of "off" during three of the four intervals in the day. These findings provide a first look at the impact of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension on motor-state patterns throughout the day, and suggest that carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension provides more consistent motor-symptom control and predictable benefit throughout the day than orally administered carbidopa/levodopa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is an effective treatment modality in the management of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) despite frequent adverse events and different rates of dropouts. Efficacy and safety data regarding Turkish patients on LCIG are limited. This study aims to report in detail the efficacy and adverse effect profile of LCIG among advanced PD patients from a Turkish center for movement disorders. Materials and methods: Twenty-two patients (50% male) who started receiving LCIG between December 2014 and March 2020 were recruited. The efficacy of LCIG was assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III), Clinical Global İmprovement (CGI) scale, and Quality of Life scale (PDQ8). Improvements in gait disorders and nonmotor features were also questioned. Adverse events (AE) were collated into 3 topics: related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J), device-related, and LCIG infusion-related. Results: Mean age and pre-LCIG disease duration were 66.7 (8.8) and 13.3 (8.0) years respectively. UPDRS III scores and H-Y scale assessments significantly improved. Better quality of life scores, clinical global improvements, and improvements in dysarthria, dysphagia, and gait were observed. None of our patients dropped out or died during a mean 17.5-month (12.3) period. Overall 20 (90.9%) patients experienced at least one AE. Twelve patients had PEG-J--related complications; three had acute abdomen. Eight (36.4%) patients had device-associated problems. Half of the patients required at least one additional endoscopic procedure and 7 had a device replaced. Mean body weight decreased from 69.5 to 62.5 kg and seven patients had newly onset PNP at a follow-up electromyography. Dyskinesia related to LCIG infusion was observed in 5 (22.7%) patients. There was no significant increase in hallucination among patients. Conclusion: LCIG is an efficient treatment modality in the management of Turkish patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Although most of the patients had at least one AE, none of them dropped out. Patient selection, patient compliance, and collaborative management are important steps affecting the success of modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Development of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia characterizes the transition from early to advanced Parkinson disease stage. Current therapeutic strategies to manage motor complications aim at increasing the number of levodopa administrations and extending its benefit by the association of enzyme blockers and dopamine agonists. However, as disease progresses, mobility becomes progressively dependent on levodopa absorption and its plasma bioavailability, resulting in loss of independence, worse quality of life and increased caregiver burden. If patients continue to experience off-time with functional impact on activities of daily living after best medication adjustments, implementation of infusion with apomorphine or levodopa, and surgical therapies should be considered. Presence of troublesome dyskinesia would also favor the choice of an advanced treatment. Compared with pulsatile oral therapy, both apomorphine and levodopa infusion determine more continuous striatal dopamine receptors stimulation than oral levodopa resulting in significant reduction of off-time and dyskinesia, particularly peak-dose, although not in their complete resolution. This observation proves that abnormal synaptic plasticity and connectivity changes cannot be reversed once they are established. Early implementation of these therapeutic strategies ideally would target patients as soon as motor complications begin rather than at late stage of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) before dyskinesia have manifested. Preliminary evidence from early deep brain stimulation in patients with short disease duration and modest motor complications suggests that this approach can positively impact quality of life. It is conceivable that changing our PD treatment algorithm and implementing device-aided therapies at the beginning of the advanced phase before dyskinesia has established, will provide more stable motor conditions and longer functional autonomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel therapy (LCIG) can efficiently improve several motor and non-motor symptoms of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The recently developed Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) improved the original UPDRS making it a more robust tool to evaluate therapeutic changes. However, previous studies have not used the MDS-UPDRS and the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) to assess the efficacy of LCIG.Objectives: Our aim was to determine if the MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS could detect improvement in the experiences of daily living following 1-year LCIG treatment.Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, open-label study, 34 consecutive patients undergoing LCIG treatment were enrolled. Patients were examined twice: prior to LCIG initiation and 12 months later. Impact of PD-related symptoms and dyskinesia was assessed by the MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS.Results: Non-motor Experiences of Daily Living part of MDS-UPDRS improved from 20 (median, interquartile-range, IQR:14-23) to 16 points (median, IQR:12-20, p = 0.044) and the Motor Experiences of Daily Living ameliorated from 24 (median, IQR:20-29) to 18 points (median, IQR:13-25, p = 0.025). Health-related quality of life, measured by PDQ-39, also improved from 35.4 (median, IQR:26.9-50.3) to 27.0 (median, IQR:21.3-31.4) points (p = 0.003). The total score of UDysRS decreased from 47 (median, IQR:36-54) to 34 (median, IQR:21-45) points (p = 0.003).Conclusions: As far as the authors are aware of, our paper is the first to evaluate the impact of LCIG on dyskinesia by the means of UDysRS. Changes in MDS-UPDRS and UDysRS confirm that LCIG treatment can efficiently improve experiences of daily living in advanced PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) is often associated with disabling motor and non-motor complications in patients with advanced disease due to the variable absorption of levodopa because of an irregular or erratic emptying of the gastric content. Methods: Prospective single movement disorder center study using pre-set selection criteria, unified PD scale (UPDRS III), non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS), and PD questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8) to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term treatment outcomes using levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion in patients with advanced PD, who were followed up every 6 months. Results: Twenty patients were recruited over a period of 6 years. Disease duration prior to LCIG infusion ranged from 5 to 18 years (mean 11.4 ± 4.2). The mean follow-up time on LCIG therapy was 48.5 ± 23.2 months (range 11-83 months). Mean 'off' time, UPDRS III, NMSS, and PDQ-8 improvement were statistically significant. Two patients dropped out and 66.7% of patients required tube replacement. Conclusion: LCIG infusion monotherapy demonstrated significant improvement in reducing the 'off' time, reducing levodopa-induced dyskinesia, and improving non-motor symptoms and quality of life. This therapy is recommended for patients in whom motor fluctuations are inadequately treated with traditional oral PD therapy. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Duodenal levodopa infusion represents an effective strategy to manage motor and non-motor complications in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, most published clinical series regard small numbers of patients and do not exceed 1 year follow-up. In this multi-national observational cohort study conducted in seven specialised PD clinics and university hospitals we assessed long-term safety and outcome of chronic treatment with intra-duodenal levodopa infusions in a large population of patients with advanced PD. The starting population consisted of 98 treated patients (safety population). We report clinical outcomes of 73 patients with subsequent efficacy assessment(s) (efficacy population) over a follow-up period up to 2 years. Follow-up periods and collection of clinical observations varied based on individual routine care program. At last follow-up there was a significant ( p ≤ 0.05) reduction in duration of 'Off' periods as well as dyskinesia duration and severity that was associated with an improvement of quality of life. Twenty three patients (25.3 % of the safety population) withdraw, due to adverse drug reaction (5), procedure and device related events (7), compliance (3) and lack of efficacy (8). The mean duration for last value reported after baseline (LV) was 608 ± 292 days (median: 697 days). Our results demonstrate significant and sustained benefit over a long observation period in motor complications and in quality of life following a change from oral pulsatile to continuous levodopa delivery. The relatively large number of withdrawals reflects the current use of duodenal levodopa infusion in very advanced PD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) is dependent on the use of dopamine replacement therapy in the form of l-dopa and dopamine agonist drugs. However, the development of dyskinesia (chorea, dystonia, athetosis) can become treatment limiting. The initiation of dyskinesia involves a priming process dependent on the presence of nigral dopaminergic cell loss leading to alterations in basal ganglia function that underlie the expression of involuntary movements following the administration of each drug dose. Once established, dyskinesia is difficult to control and it is even more difficult to reverse the priming process. Dyskinesia is more commonly induced by l-dopa than by dopamine agonist drugs. This has been associated with the short duration of l-dopa causing pulsatile stimulation of postsynaptic dopamine receptors compared to the longer acting dopamine agonists that cause more continuous stimulation. As a result, the concept of continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS) has arisen and has come to dominate the strategy for treatment of early PD. However, CDS has flaws that have led to the general acceptance that continuous drug delivery (CDD) is key to the successful treatment of PD. Studies in both experimental models of PD and in clinical trials have shown CDD to improve efficacy, but reduce dyskinesia induction, and to reverse established involuntary movements. Two key clinical strategies currently address the concept of CDD: (1) in early-, mid- and late-stage PD, transdermal administration of rotigotine provides 24 h of drug delivery; (2) in late-stage PD, the constant intraduodenal administration of l-dopa is utilized to improve control of motor symptoms and to diminish established dyskinesia. This review examines the rationale for CDD and explores the clinical benefit of using such a strategy for the treatment of patients with PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We studied 19 patients (14 men, 5 women, Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y)≥3) with advanced Parkinson''s disease (PD) attending the Parkinson Institute, Milan, whose motor fluctuations and dyskinesia were not controlled by oral medications. After all oral PD medications had been withdrawn, they received a duodenal levodopa infusions (Duodopa, Solvay Pharmaceuticals) for 14h/day through a transabdominal port; levodopa boluses were administered in the morning and during “off” periods. The patients were evaluated by means of the UPDRS in the morning (“off”) and 60–120min after the infusion (“on”) at baseline and for a mean follow-up of 13.5±12.5months (up to 36months in 10 patients:). Levodopa (l-DOPA) and its metabolites were determined by HPLC with electrochemical detection. l-DOPA concentrations tended to higher in the afternoon (2008±345 vs 1713±274ng/mL) and correlated with the daily dose. O-methyldopa (OMD) levels correlated with l-DOPA levels, and the OMD/l-DOPA ratios were stable over the day. There was a relationship between decreasing UPDRS III scores and decreasing OMD/l-DOPA ratios. Dyskinesia (UPDRS IV, items 32–34) showed a clear improvement over time but there was no clear relationship with l-DOPA and OMD levels, or the OMD/l-DOPA ratio. The l-DOPA/dose ratio was stable over time, whereas OMD levels and the OMD/l-DOPA ratio decreased. It is conceivable that continuous infusion decreases metabolism possibly due to a reduction in methyl donor availability, as demonstrated by the increase in total homocysteine levels. Our results do not support the development of tolerance even after several months of continuous infusion, and indicate that pharmacodynamic factors play a role in afternoon off periods. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]