Search

Background: It is unknown whether more sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays maintain their clinical utility in patients with renal dysfunction. Moreover, their optimal cutoff levels in this vulnerable patient population have not previously been defined., Methods and Results: In this multicenter study, we examined the clinical utility of 7 more sensitive cTn assays (3 sensitive and 4 high-sensitivity cTn assays) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. Among 2813 unselected patients, 447 (16%) had renal dysfunction (defined as Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)). The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including coronary angiography and serial levels of high-sensitivity cTnT. Acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 36% of all patients with renal dysfunction. Among patients with renal dysfunction and elevated baseline cTn levels (≥99th percentile), acute myocardial infarction was the most common diagnosis for all assays (range, 45%-80%). In patients with renal dysfunction, diagnostic accuracy at presentation, quantified by the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve, was 0.87 to 0.89 with no significant differences between the 7 more sensitive cTn assays and further increased to 0.91 to 0.95 at 3 hours. Overall, the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve in patients with renal dysfunction was only slightly lower than in patients with normal renal function. The optimal receiver-operator characteristic curve-derived cTn cutoff levels in patients with renal dysfunction were significantly higher compared with those in patients with normal renal function (factor, 1.9-3.4)., Conclusions: More sensitive cTn assays maintain high diagnostic accuracy in patients with renal dysfunction. To ensure the best possible clinical use, assay-specific optimal cutoff levels, which are higher in patients with renal dysfunction, should be considered., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587., (© 2015 The Authors.)

Background: Endothelial dysfunction plays a major role in cardiovascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, its quantification has not been available as a clinical tool., Methods: In a prospective international multicentre study, we analyzed the diagnostic and prognostic utility of endothelial dysfunction as quantified by C-terminal proendothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) in 658 consecutive patients presenting with suspected AMI. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Patients were followed long-term for mortality., Results: The adjudicated final diagnosis was AMI in 145 patients (22%). The diagnostic performance of CT-proET-1 for AMI was moderate; its area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve amounted to 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.72; P < 0.001). There was no significant increase in the AUC when CT-proET-1 was added to either cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT). Seventy four percent of patients who died during the first 24 months (n = 50) were in the fourth quartile of the CT-proET-1 presentation value (>82 pmol/L). The prognostic accuracy of CT-proET-1 regarding mortality was tantamount to that of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and outperformed cTnT and hs-cTnT both in patients with AMI and in patients without acute coronary syndrome. CT-proET-1 at presentation yielded high prognostic accuracy that was similar to that of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores. The TIMI risk score could be significantly improved by adding CT-proET-1 (integrated discriminatory improvement [IDI] of 0.074 P = 0.004)., Conclusions: Use of CT-proET-1 improves risk stratification of unselected patients with suspected AMI. CT-proET-1 did not provide additional diagnostic value., (Copyright © 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)