Search

Seismic phase picking and magnitude estimation are fundamental aspects of earthquake monitoring and seismic event analysis. Accurate phase picking allows for precise characterization of seismic wave arrivals, contributing to a better understanding of earthquake events. Likewise, accurate magnitude estimation provides crucial information about an earthquake's size and potential impact. Together, these components enhance our ability to monitor seismic activity effectively. In this study, we explore the application of deep-learning techniques for earthquake detection and magnitude estimation using continuous seismic recordings. Our approach introduces DynaPicker, which leverages dynamic convolutional neural networks to detect seismic body-wave phases in continuous seismic data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DynaPicker using various open-source seismic datasets, including both window-format and continuous recordings. We evaluate its performance in seismic phase identification and arrival-time picking, as well as its robustness in classifying seismic phases using low-magnitude seismic data in the presence of noise. Furthermore, we integrate the phase arrival-time information into a previously published deep-learning model for magnitude estimation. We apply this workflow to continuous recordings of aftershock sequences following the Turkey earthquake. The results of this case study showcase the reliability of our approach in earthquake detection, phase picking, and magnitude estimation, contributing valuable insights to seismic event analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Seismic phase picking and magnitude estimation are essential components of real-time earthquake monitoring and earthquake early warning systems. Reliable phase picking enables the timely detection of seismic wave arrivals, facilitating rapid earthquake characterization and early warning alerts. Accurate magnitude estimation provides crucial information about an earthquake’s size and potential impact. Together, these steps contribute to effective earthquake monitoring, enhancing our ability to implement appropriate response measures in seismically active regions and mitigate risks. In this study, we explore the potential of deep learning in real-time earthquake monitoring. To that aim, we begin by introducing DynaPicker which leverages dynamic convolutional neural networks to detect seismic body wave phases. Subsequently, DynaPicker is employed for seismic phase picking on continuous seismic recordings. To showcase the efficacy of Dynapicker, several open-source seismic datasets including window-format data and continuous seismic data are used to demonstrate it’s performance in seismic phase identification, and arrival-time picking. Additionally, DynaPicker’s robustness in classifying seismic phases was tested on the low-magnitude seismic data polluted by noise. Finally, the phase arrival time information is integrated into a previously published deep-learning model for magnitude estimation. This workflow is then applied and tested on the continuous recording of the aftershock sequences following the Turkey earthquake to detect the earthquakes, seismic phase picking and estimate the magnitude of the corresponding event. The results obtained in this case study exhibit a high level of reliability in detecting the earthquakes and estimating the magnitude of aftershocks following the Turkey earthquake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-rate Global Navigation Satellite System (HR-GNSS) data can be highly useful for earthquake analysis as it provides continuous high-frequency measurements of ground motion. This data can be used to analyze diverse parameters related to the seismic source and to assess the potential of an earthquake to prompt strong motions at certain distances and even generate tsunamis. In this work, we present the first results of a deep learning model based on a convolutional neural network for earthquake magnitude estimation, using HR-GNSS displacement time series. The influence of different dataset configurations, such as station numbers, epicentral distances, signal duration, and earthquake size, were analyzed to figure out how the model can be adapted to various scenarios. We explored the potential of the model for global application and compared its performance using both synthetic and real data from different seismogenic regions. The performance of our model at this stage was satisfactory in estimating earthquake magnitude from synthetic data with 0.07 ≤ RMS ≤ 0.11. Comparable results were observed in tests using synthetic data from a different region than the training data, with RMS ≤ 0.15. Furthermore, the model was tested using real data from different regions and magnitudes, resulting in the best cases with 0.09 ≤ RMS ≤ 0.33, provided that the data from a particular group of stations had similar epicentral distance constraints to those used during the model training. The robustness of the DL model can be improved to work independently from the window size of the time series and the number of stations, enabling faster estimation by the model using only near-field data. Overall, this study provides insights for the development of future DL approaches for earthquake magnitude estimation with HR-GNSS data, emphasizing the importance of proper handling and careful data selection for further model improvements. • We present the first results of a deep learning model based on a convolutional neural network for earthquake magnitude estimation, using HR-GNSS displacement time series. • The influence of different dataset configurations, such as station numbers, epicentral distances, signal duration, and earthquake size, were analyzed to figure out how the model can be adapted to various scenarios. • The model was tested using real data from different regions and magnitudes, resulting in the best cases with 0.09 ≤ RMS ≤ 0.33. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]