Text in English ; Abstract: English and Turkish Includes bibliographical references (leaves 116-118) xx, 138 leaves Earthquake causes huge loss of lives and enormous damages to properties every year. In order to understand and avoid such damages, different types of seismic isolators have been used. To get the optimal and effective types of seismic isolators, a comparison study of three same-sized 12-storey steel buildings with conventional steel braced frames, and lead rubber bearing (LRB) fixed-based with fluid viscous dampers (FVD) is conducted and their seismic performance enhancements are evaluated using SAP2000 software. Researchers suggest that the seismic isolator building can survive seismic agitation behaviors such as uplifts, stress against ruptures, shears, cracking and displacements. In the study, three same-sized steel structures with different seismic isolator models, special moment and concentric moment frames of all three structures (SMF and SCBF) respectively, earthquake location (Kocaeli Turkey, Yarimca, 8/17/1999) have been selected, performing non-linear time history analysis, non-linear evaluation of dynamic behavioral building response spectrum analysis under load varying time function and design parameters are conducted. As a result of this study, conventional buildings, lead rubber bearing buildings and fluid viscous damper building storey displacement, inter-storey drifts, mode shape, shear force, axial force, base shear, and time history analysis for nonlinear dynamic structural responses are evaluated and compared with the conventional, lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper building, according to American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC 360-16). Deprem her yıl önemli can kayıplarına ve maddi hasarlara neden olmaktadır. Bu tür hasarları anlamak ve önlemek için yıllardır farklı tipte sismik izolatörler icat edilmiş ve mevcuttur. Optimum ve etkili sismik izolatör türlerini elde etmek için, geleneksel çelik çapraz çerçeveli üç adet aynı büyüklükteki 12 katlı çelik bina ve akışkan viskoz damperli (FVD) sabit tabanlı kurşun kauçuk mesnetli (LRB) bir karşılaştırma çalışması yapıldı ve sismik performans iyileştirmeleri SAP2000 yazılımı kullanılarak değerlendirilmektedir. Araştırmacılar, sismik izolatör binasının yükselmeler, yırtılmalara karşı stres, kesme, çatlama ve yer değiştirme gibi sismik ajitasyon davranışlarına dayanabileceğini öne sürüyorlar. Bu çalışmada bina seçim aşaması, yapısal sistemlerin (SMF ve SCBF) kararı, deprem yerinin seçimi (Kocaeli Türkiye, Yarımca, 8/17/1999), doğrusal olmayan zaman tanım alanı analizi yapılması, dinamik davranışın doğrusal olmayan değerlendirilmesi ele alınmaktadır. yük değişen zaman fonksiyonu ve tasarım parametreleri altında yapı tepki spektrumu analizi dikkate alınmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonucunda, doğrusal olmayan dinamik yapısal tepkiler için konvansiyonel binalar, kurşun kauçuk taşıyan binalar ve akışkan viskoz sönümleyici bina kat deplasmanı, katlar arası ötelenmeler, mod şekli, kesme kuvveti, eksenel kuvvet, taban kesme ve zaman alanı analizleri değerlendirilmiştir. ve Amerikan Çelik Konstrüksiyon Enstitüsü'ne (AISC 360-16) göre geleneksel, kurşun kauçuk yataklı ve akışkan viskoz damper binası ile karşılaştırıldığında. Conventional steel structure Lead rubber bearing isolation system Fluid viscous damper Objectives of the study Main scope Overview procedure/ Thesis outline NUMERICAL AND STRUCTURAL MODELING ANALYSIS Building description Building framing and elevations 3D plan Steel building detailing frames and sections Material property Load combination Specification, codes, and standards used Analysis option Analysis option procedure Structure and effectiveness of lead rubber bearing in seismic isolation Fluid viscous damper structure and efficacy Steps for defining building models by using SAP2000 program Model structural input Model rubber isolation system input Model fluid viscous damper system input Steel design check input Analysis of earthquake Response spectrum analysis Response spectrum analysis – ASCE 7-16 Ground motion data Selection of ground motion Time history analysis (Non-linear dynamic analysis) Properties of non-linear plastic hinges (ASCE 41-06) Structural component plastic hinges deformation Plastic deformation analysis guidelines DESIGN STRUCTURES PHASE Design specifications (ASCE 7-16) Design of the conventional steel building Design of the conventional steel building model Design of the conventional steel building drifts and strengths Design of the lead rubber bearing isolation building Design of lead rubber bearing isolation building model Design of lead rubber bearing isolation building drifts and strengths Design of the fluid viscous damper building Design of fluid viscous damper structure model Design of fluid viscous damper building drifts and strengths Displacement and inter-drift analysis earthquake in the x-direction for fixedbase structure Fixed base for the displacement analysis earthquake in the x-direction Fixed base for the inter-drift analysis earthquake in the x-direction Fixed base for the shear-force analysis in the x-direction earthquake Fixed base for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the ydirection Fixed base for the displacement analysis earthquake in the y-direction Fixed base for the inter-drift analysis earthquake in the y-direction Fixed base shear-force for the analysis in the y-direction earthquake Time period for the fixed base model Time history analysis for the conventional structure model Displacement and velocity for (THA) in the x-direction for the conventional structure model Displacement and velocity for (THA) in the y-direction for the conventional structure model Acceleration for (THA) in the x-direction for the conventional structure model Acceleration for (THA) in the y-direction for the conventional structure model Lead rubber bearing isolation system for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the x-direction Lead rubber bearing displacement analysis earthquake in the xdirection Lead rubber bearing storey drift analysis earthquake in the x-direction Shear force the analysis in the x-direction earthquake for the (LRB) Lead rubber bearing isolation system for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the y-direction Lead rubber bearing isolation system displacement analysis earthquake for y-direction Lead rubber bearing isolation system inter-drift analysis earthquake in the y-direction Shear force the analysis in the y-direction earthquake for the lead rubber bearing Time period for the lead rubber bearing isolation system model Time history analysis for the (LRB) model Displacement and velocity time history analysis in x-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system model Displacement and velocity time history analysis in y-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system model Acceleration time history analysis in x-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system model Acceleration time history analysis in y-direction for lead rubber bearing isolation system model Fluid viscous damper for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the x-direction Fluid viscous damper of the displacement analysis earthquake in the x-direction Fluid viscous damper of the storey drift analysis earthquake in the xdirection Fluid viscous damper for the shear force analysis in the x-direction earthquake Fluid viscous damper for the displacement and drift phase analysis earthquake in the y-direction Fluid viscous damper of the displacement analysis earthquake in the y-direction Fluid viscous damper of the inter drift analysis earthquake in the ydirection Fluid viscous damper for the shear force earthquake in the y-direction Time period for the fluid viscous damper model Time history analysis for the fluid viscous damper model Displacement and velocity (THA) in the x-direction for the fluid viscous damper model Displacement and velocity time history analysis in the y-direction for the fluid viscous damper model Acceleration (THA) in the x-direction for the fluid viscous damper model Acceleration (THA) in the y-direction for the fluid viscous damper model Results for case study building three system comparing model Storey displacement in the x-direction due to earthquake for the conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damper Storey displacement in y-direction due to earthquake conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damper Storey drift in the x-direction due to earthquake conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damper Storey drift in the y-direction due to earthquake conventional structure, (LRB), and fluid viscous damper Time period for the conventional structure, (LRB), and (FVD) Base Shear for the conventional structure, (LRB), and (FVD) Stiffness models for the conventional structure, (LRB), and (FVD) Comparing results of dampers for building structure systems with lead rubber bearing (LRB) and fluid viscous damper (FVD) Storey drift in the x-direction due to earthquake for (LRB) and (FVD) Storey drift in the y-direction due to earthquake for lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper Axial-force in the exterior columns for comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper Axial-force in the interior columns for comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper Shear force in the beams for the comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper Shear force in the exterior column for comparing with the lead rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper Shear force in the interior column for comparing with the (LRB) and (FVD)