Search

Background: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is pivotal for sustaining the function of failing hearts and lungs, and its utilization has risen. In cases where conventional cannulation strategies prove ineffective for providing adequate ECLS support, the implementation of an enhanced system with a third cannula may become necessary. Hybrid ECLS may be warranted in situations characterized by severe hypoxemia of the upper extremity, left ventricular congestion, and dilatation. Additionally, it may also be considered for patients requiring respiratory support or experiencing hemodynamic instability. Method: All hybrid ECLS cases of adults at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between January 2007 and December 2019 with initial triple cannulation were included. Data were collected via a retrospective review of patient records and direct export of the clinical information system. Results: 28 out of 903 ECLS cases were initially hybrid cannulated (3.1%). The median age was 57 (48.2 to 60.8) years, and the sex was equally distributed. The in-hospital mortality of hybrid ECLS was high (67.9%). In-hospital mortality rates differ depending on the indication (ARDS: 36.4%, refractory cardiogenic shock: 88.9%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 100%, post-cardiotomy: 100%, others: 75%). Survivors exhibited a lower SAPS II level compared with non-survivors (20.0 (12.0 to 65.0) vs. 55.0 (45.0 to 73.0)), and the allogenic transfusion of platelet concentrate was observed to be less frequent for survivors (0.0 (0.0) vs. 1.8 (2.5) units). Conclusion: The in-hospital mortality rate for hybrid ECLS was high. Different indications showed varying mortality rates, with survivors having lower SAPS II scores and requiring fewer platelet concentrate transfusions. These findings highlight the complexities of hybrid ECLS outcomes in different clinical scenarios and underline the importance of rigorous patient selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite increasing use and understanding of the process, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) therapy is still associated with considerable mortality. Personalized and quick survival predictions using machine learning methods can assist in clinical decision making before ECMO insertion. Methods: This is a multicenter study to develop and validate an easy-to-use prognostic model to predict in-hospital mortality of VA-ECMO therapy, using unbiased recursive partitioning with conditional inference trees. We compared two sets with different numbers of variables (small and comprehensive), all of which were available just before ECMO initiation. The area under the curve (AUC), the cross-validated Brier score, and the error rate were applied to assess model performance. Data were collected retrospectively between 2007 and 2019. Results: 837 patients were eligible for this study; 679 patients in the derivation cohort (median (IQR) age 60 (49 to 69) years; 187 (28%) female patients) and a total of 158 patients in two external validation cohorts (median (IQR) age 57 (49 to 65) and 70 (63 to 76) years). For the small data set, the model showed a cross-validated error rate of 35.79% and an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence interval from 0.66 to 0.74). In the comprehensive data set, the error rate was the same with a value of 35.35%, with an AUC of 0.71 (95% confidence interval from 0.67 to 0.75). The mean Brier scores of the two models were 0.210 (small data set) and 0.211 (comprehensive data set). External validation showed an error rate of 43% and AUC of 0.60 (95% confidence interval from 0.52 to 0.69) using the small tree and an error rate of 35% with an AUC of 0.63 (95% confidence interval from 0.54 to 0.72) using the comprehensive tree. There were large differences between the two validation sets. Conclusions: Conditional inference trees are able to augment prognostic clinical decision making for patients undergoing ECMO treatment. They may provide a degree of accuracy in mortality prediction and prognostic stratification using readily available variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a salvage treatment for acute circulatory failure. Our high‐volume tertiary centre performs more than 100 implants annually and provides ECLS‐transports. With this study, we aimed to analyze the incidence and risk factors of limb ischemia depending on the vascular access. Methods: Between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2018, 937 patients received an ECLS. Preoperative, intraoperative, in‐hospital and up to 5 years follow‐up data were collected. Outcome measures were limb ischemia and survival. Results: In total, 402 femoro‐femoral veno‐arterial ECLS patients were identified. Mean age was 56 ± 16.7 years, 26.9% were female, 7.9% had a history of peripheral vascular disease. Cannulation was performed percutaneously in 82.1% (n = 330), surgically in 5.7% (n = 23) and combined in 12.2% (n = 49). Mortality was not significantly different between the groups (51.1% percutaneous, 43.5% surgical, 44.9% combined [p = 0.89]). There was no significant difference in limb ischemia either, but a trend toward an increased frequency in the percutaneous group (p = 0.0501). No amputation was necessary. Limb ischemia slightly increased in‐hospital mortality (54.6%) but did not affect long‐term survival beyond 30 days. Univariate analysis adjusted for cannulation methods revealed younger age and female gender as risk factors of limb ischemia and younger age for limb ischemia after percutaneous cannulation. Conclusions: Our study shows that percutaneous, surgical, and combined vascular access techniques for ECLS implantation are associated with comparable and low incidence of limb ischemia which slightly increases in‐hospital mortality. Special precaution has to be taken in young and female patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Pharmacodynamics suggests that levosimendan might be a valuable inotrope for weaning from extracorporeal life support (ECLS). As there is a paucity of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of such an approach, the aim was to report the authors' experiences in ECLS weaning before and after the implementation of levosimendan in clinical practice. Design Retrospective before-and-after study. Setting Cardiac intensive care unit of a university hospital. Participants A total of 64 patients under ECLS for postcardiotomy cardiac failure, who underwent an ECLS weaning trial. Intervention Group comparisons between patients treated with levosimendan and patients treated with milrinone were made with the Mann-Whitney U test or the Pearson chi-squared test. Results are given as median (interquartile range) or numbers (percentages). Measurements and Main Results Of 64 patients, 26 (41%) received levosimendan. Successful ECLS weaning was achieved in 24 (92%) and 30 patients (79%) in the levosimendan and milrinone group, respectively (p = 0.18). In the levosimendan group, fewer patients had an intra-aortic balloon pump for weaning (2 [7.7%] v 15 [40%], p = 0.008). The support with norepinephrine was similar in the levosimendan and milrinone groups at the time of ECLS removal (0.06 [0.01-0.11] v 0.07 [0.01-0.16] µg/kg/min, p = 0.64) and 24 hours later (0.06 [0.04-0.09] v 0.04 [0.00-0.09] µg/kg/min, p = 0.15). Twenty-eight days (9/26 (35%) v 14/35 (40%), p = 0.28) and 180 days (13/26 [50%] v 15/34 [44%], p = 0.80) mortalities after ECLS removal were similar in the levosimendan and the milrinone groups. Conclusion Levosimendan enabled ECLS weaning without increasing norepinephrine requirements when compared to a control group receiving milrinone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The present study was designed to assess in vivo a new, optimized, virtually wall-less, dual-lumen, bi-caval cannula for veno-venous ECMO in comparison to a commercially available cannula. Methods: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was carried out in a bovine study (n=5, bodyweight 75±5kg). Following systemic heparinization, ECMO was established in a trans-jugular fashion through a calibrated 23F orifice, using a new, optimized, virtually wall-less, dual-lumen, bi-caval 24F cannula (Smartcanula LLC, Lausanne, Switzerland) versus a commercially available 23F bi-caval, dual-lumen control cannula (Avalon Elite®, Maquet, Rastatt, Germany) in a veno-venous ECMO setup. Veno-venous ECMO was initiated at 500 revolutions per minute (RPM) and increased by incremental steps of 500 RPM up to 2500 RPM. Catheter outlet pressure, catheter inlet pressure, oxygen saturation and pump flow were recorded at each stage. Results: Mean flow accounted for 0.37±0.04 L/min for wall-less versus 0.29± 0.07 L/min for control at 500 RPM, 0.97±0.12 versus 0.67±0.06 at 1000 RPM, 1.60±0.14 versus 1.16±0.08 at 1500 RPM, 2.31±0.13 versus 1.52±0.13 for 2000 RPM and 3.02±0.5 versus 2.11±0.18 (p<0.004). The mean venous suction required was 19±8 mmHg for wall-less versus 20±3 mmHg for control at 500 RPM, 7±3 versus 9±4 for 1000 RPM, -11±10 versus -12±8 at 1500 RPM, -39±15 versus -49±10 for 2000 RPM and -60±28 versus -94±7 for 2500 RPM. The mean venous injection pressure accounted for 29±7 mmHg for wall-less versus 27±5 mmHg for control at 500 RPM, 50±6 versus 61±7 at 1000 RPM, 89±10 versus 99±17 for 1500 RPM, 142±14 versus 161±9 at 2000 RPM and 211±41 versus 252 ±3 for 2500 RPM. Conclusion: Compared to the commercially available control cannula, the new, optimized, virtually wall-less, dual-lumen, bi-caval 24F cannula allows for significantly higher blood flows, requires less suction and results in lower injection pressures in vivo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]