Search

Shorelines around many estuaries and coastal embayments are rapidly eroding (approximately several meters/year), with more rapid erosion rates expected in the future due to natural and anthropogenic stressors. In response, a variety of techniques have been used to stabilize shorelines, but there are limited quantitative, long-term data available about their effects on the sedimentary environment immediately adjacent to them (i.e., the nearshore). This study evaluated changes in sediment characteristics (mud and organic content) and accumulation rates associated with installation of breakwaters, riprap, and living shorelines with (“hybrid”) and without (“soft”) a structural component. 210Pb (half-life 22.3 years) geochronologies were used to identify horizons in core profiles that corresponded to years when structures were built. Sites with naturally eroding shorelines (i.e., no structures) were used as a control group at which any sedimentary changes represent broad environmental trends, in contrast to changes at the protected sites that also include the influence of structures. Observations were placed within the context of modeled wave climate, shoreline-erosion rates, land use, dominant sediment source, and the apparent effect on submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) inhabiting the nearshore sedimentary environment. The main conclusion of this study is that there was no “one size fits all” answer to anticipated impacts of structures on nearshore sedimentary environments. Instead, specific changes associated with structures depended on individual site characteristics, but could be predicted with multiple linear regression models that included structure type, shoreline-erosion rate, dominant sediment source, and land use. Riprap or breakwater installation had either positive or no obvious impact on SAV at six of seven sites but negatively impacted SAV at one riprapped site. No obvious impacts on SAV were observed at living shoreline sites.

We quantified the effects of water flow on secondary seed and seedling dispersal for two seagrass species with different reproductive strategies: turtle grass ( Thalassia testudinum ) whose large seeds (15.1 ± 0.8 mm tall) have the potential for long distance dispersal by current-mediated transport of buoyant fruits, and shoal grass ( Halodule wrightii ), whose small seeds (2.1 ± 0.1 mm tall) are released adjacent to the parent plant and create a persistent seed bank. Results from field dispersal experiments in Texas indicate that under normal flow conditions (mean water velocity − 1 ), turtle grass seedling movement is greater over bare sand than within seagrass beds and seedlings have the potential to move up to 2.1 m d − 1 . Fine hairs on the seedling base trap sand grains, which likely leads to final seedling establishment after a few days and a potential secondary dispersal distance along the substrate of − 1 , but seed entrapment in sediment ripples likely limits the total secondary dispersal distance to

The conservation of coastal ecosystems can provide considerable coastal protection benefits, but this role has not been sufficiently accounted for in coastal planning and engineering. Substantial evidence now exists showing how, and under what conditions, ecosystems can play a valuable function in wave and storm surge attenuation, erosion reduction, and in the longer term maintenance of the coastal profile. Both through their capacity for self repair and recovery, and through the often considerable cobenefits they provide, ecosystems can offer notable advantages over traditional engineering approaches in some settings. They can also be combined in "hybrid" engineering designs. We make 10 recommendations to encourage the utilization of existing knowledge and to improve the incorporation of ecosystems into policy, planning and funding for coastal hazard risk reduction.

This study assesses spatial and temporal sedimentological trends in four mesohaline Chesapeake Bay submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) habitats, two with persistent SAV beds and two with ephemeral SAV beds, to determine their relationship to current and historical sediment characteristics—grain size, organic content, and accumulation rates. In general, grain size is similar among all sites, and subsurface sediment differs from surficial sediment only at one site where a thin surficial sand layer (∼2–3 cm) is present. This thin sand layer is not completely preserved in the longer-term sedimentary record even though it is critical to determining whether the sediment is suitable for SAV. Evidence for nearshore fining, similar to that observed in the deeper waters of the Bay, is present at the site where the shoreline has been hardened suggesting that locations with hardened shorelines limit exchange of coarser (sandy) material between the shore and nearshore environments. Whether the fining trend will continue to a point at which the sediment will become unsuitable for SAV in the future or whether some new type of equilibrium will be reached cannot be addressed with our data. Instead, our data suggest that SAV presence/absence is related to changes in sedimentary characteristics—persistent beds have relatively steady sediment composition, while ephemeral beds have finer sediments due to reduced sand input. Additionally, sediment accumulation rates in the persistent beds are ∼9 mm/year, whereas rates in the ephemeral beds are ∼3 mm/year. Thus, the ephemeral sites highlight two potential sedimentary controls on SAV distribution: the presence of a sufficiently thick surficial sand layer as previously postulated by Wicks (2005) and accumulation rates high enough to bury seeds prior to germination and/or keep up with sea-level rise.

The Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 have spurred global interest in the role of coastal wetlands and vegetation in reducing storm surge and flood damages. Evidence that coastal wetlands reduce storm surge and attenuate waves is often cited in support of restoring Gulf Coast wetlands to protect coastal communities and property from hurricane damage. Yet interdisciplinary studies combining hydrodynamic and economic analysis to explore this relationship for temperate marshes in the Gulf are lacking. By combining hydrodynamic analysis of simulated hurricane storm surges and economic valuation of expected property damages, we show that the presence of coastal marshes and their vegetation has a demonstrable effect on reducing storm surge levels, thus generating significant values in terms of protecting property in southeast Louisiana. Simulations for four storms along a sea to land transect show that surge levels decline with wetland continuity and vegetation roughness. Regressions confirm that wetland continuity and vegetation along the transect are effective in reducing storm surge levels. A 0.1 increase in wetland continuity per meter reduces property damages for the average affected area analyzed in southeast Louisiana, which includes New Orleans, by $99-$133, and a 0.001 increase in vegetation roughness decreases damages by $24-$43. These reduced damages are equivalent to saving 3 to 5 and 1 to 2 properties per storm for the average area, respectively.

Seagrass beds have declined in Chesapeake Bay, USA as well as worldwide over the past century. Increased seston concentrations, which decrease light penetration, are likely one of the main causes of the decline in Chesapeake Bay. It has been hypothesized that dense populations of suspension-feeding bivalves, such as eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica), may filter sufficient seston from the water to reduce light attenuation and enhance seagrass growth. Furthermore, eastern oyster populations can form large three-dimensional reef-like structures that may act like breakwaters by attenuating waves, thus decreasing sediment resuspension. We developed a quasi-three-dimensional Seagrass-Waves-Oysters-Light-Seston (SWOLS) model to investigate whether oyster reefs and breakwaters could improve seagrass growth by reducing seston concentrations. Seagrass growth potential (SGP), a parameter controlled by resuspension-induced turbidity, was calculated in simulations in which wave height, oyster abundance, and reef/breakwater configuration were varied. Wave height was the dominant factor influencing SGP, with higher waves increasing sediment resuspension and decreasing SGP. Submerged breakwaters parallel with the shoreline improved SGP in the presence of 0.2 and 0.4 m waves when sediment resuspension was dominated by wave action, while submerged groins perpendicular to the shoreline improved SGP under lower wave heights (0.05 and 0.1 m) when resuspension was dominated by along-shore tidal currents. Oyster-feeding activity did not affect SGP, due to the oysters’ distance from the seagrass bed and reduced oyster filtration rates under either low or high sediment concentrations. Although the current implementation of the SWOLS model has simplified geometry, the model does demonstrate that the interaction between oyster filtration and along-shore circulation, and between man-made structures and wave heights, should be considered when managing seagrass habitats, planning seagrass restoration projects, and choosing the most suitable methods to protect shorelines from erosion.

We tested the hypothesis that currents, waves, and sediment grain size affect the dispersal of seeds and seedlings of the submersed angiosperms Ruppia maritima, Potamogeton perfoliatus and Stuckenia pectinata. Seed settling velocities and initiation of motion of seeds and seedlings and distance transported were quantified on four sediment types under a range of currents and waves in a flume. The rapid settling velocities of R. maritima and S. pectinata seeds and the increased settling velocity of P. perfoliatus in currents above 8 cm/second suggest that primary dispersal of these species is localized to the general area colonized by their parents. Once settled within a bed, seeds are exposed to weak currents and waves, and are likely to be subject to sediment deposition which may further limit dispersal. In contrast, in restoration projects, the absence of vegetation is likely to make seeds more vulnerable to grazing and transport, and may contribute to the lack of plant establishment. If seeds germinate without being buried, they are susceptible to secondary dispersal at relatively low current velocities and small wave heights due to the drag exerted on the cotyledon. Sand grains tend to stick to the seed coat and rootlet of P. perfoliatus seedlings, perhaps a mechanism to reduce the chances of being displaced following germination. These data reveal the close links between sediment, water flow, and submersed angiosperm seedling establishment; these parameters should be considered when using seeds for restoration of submersed angiosperms.

Natural processes tend to vary over time and space, as well as between species. The ecosystem services these natural processes provide are therefore also highly variable. It is often assumed that ecosystem services are pro- vided linearly (unvaryingly, at a steady rate), but natural processes are characterized by thresholds and limit- ing functions. In this paper, we describe the variability observed in wave attenuation provided by marshes, mangroves, seagrasses, and coral reefs and therefore also in coastal protection. We calculate the economic con- sequences of assuming coastal protection to be linear. We suggest that, in order to refine ecosystem-based man- agement practices, it is essential that natural variability and cumulative effects be considered in the valuation of ecosystem services. Fil: Koch, Evamaria W.. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Scienc; Estados Unidos Fil: Barbier, Edward B.. University of Wyoming; Estados Unidos Fil: Silliman, Brian R.. University of Florida; Estados Unidos Fil: Reed, Denise J.. University of New Orleans; Estados Unidos Fil: Perillo, Gerardo Miguel E.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía; Argentina Fil: Hacker, Sally D.. Oregon State University; Estados Unidos Fil: Granek, Elise F.. Portland State University; Estados Unidos Fil: Primavera, Jurgenne H.. Asian Fisheries Development Center; Filipinas Fil: Muthiga, Nyawira. Western Indian Ocean Project; Kenia Fil: Polasky, Stephen. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos Fil: Halpern, Benjamin S.. University of California Santa Barbara; Estados Unidos Fil: Kennedy, Christopher J.. University of Wyoming; Estados Unidos Fil: Kappel, Carrie V.. University of California Santa Barbar; Estados Unidos Fil: Wolanski, Eric. James Cook University; Australia

The effects of seagrass bed geometry on wave attenuation and suspended sediment transport were investigated using a modified Nearshore Community Model (NearCoM). The model was enhanced to account for cohesive sediment erosion and deposition, sediment transport, combined wave and current shear stresses, and seagrass effects on drag. Expressions for seagrass drag as a function of seagrass shoot density and canopy height were derived from published flume studies of model vegetation. The predicted reduction of volume flux for steady flow through a bed agreed reasonably well with a separate flume study. Predicted wave attenuation qualitatively captured seasonal patterns observed in the field: wave attenuation peaked during the flowering season and decreased as shoot density and canopy height decreased. Model scenarios with idealized bathymetries demonstrated that, when wave orbital velocities and the seagrass canopy interact, increasing seagrass bed width in the direction of wave propagation results in higher wave attenuation, and increasing incoming wave height results in higher relative wave attenuation. The model also predicted lower skin friction, reduced erosion rates, and higher bottom sediment accumulation within and behind the bed. Reduced erosion rates within seagrass beds have been reported, but reductions in stress behind the bed require further studies for verification. Model results suggest that the mechanism of sediment trapping by seagrass beds is more complex than reduced erosion rates alone; it also requires suspended sediment sources outside of the bed and horizontal transport into the bed.

Seagrasses are an important coastal habitat worldwide and are indicative of environmental health at the critical land–sea interface. In many parts of the world, seagrasses are not well known, although they provide crucial functions and values to the world’s oceans and to human populations dwelling along the coast. Established in 2001, SeagrassNet, a monitoring program for seagrasses worldwide, uses a standardized protocol for detecting change in seagrass habitat to capture both seagrass parameters and environmental variables. SeagrassNet is designed to statistically detect change over a relatively short time frame (1–2 years) through quarterly monitoring of permanent plots. Currently, SeagrassNet operates in 18 countries at 48 sites; at each site, a permanent transect is established and a team of people from the area collects data which is sent to the SeagrassNet database for analysis. We present five case studies based on SeagrassNet data from across the Americas (two sites in the USA, one in Belize, and two in Brazil) which have a common theme of seagrass decline; the study represents a first latitudinal comparison across a hemisphere using a common methodology. In two cases, rapid loss of seagrass was related to eutrophication, in two cases losses related to climate change, and in one case, the loss is attributed to a complex trophic interaction resulting from the presence of a marine protected area. SeagrassNet results provide documentation of seagrass change over time and allow us to make scientifically supported statements about the status of seagrass habitat and the extent of need for management action.

Biological processes in seagrass meadows are regulated by the exchange of momentum, heat and mass between the surrounding water and the plants and thus may strongly depend on the characteristics of water flow and turbulence. Comparisons of mean flow profiles, turbulence distribution and mixing in meadows of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum colonizing 2 hydrodynamically different sites (wave-dominated and tide-dominated) suggest that the hydrodynamic microclimate and consequently mixing within seagrass beds strongly depend on the hydrodynamic forces (waves and currents) acting on the plants. Unidirectional flows deflect the water over the meadow (skimming flows), which potentially leads to lower mixing between the water above and within the meadow. In contrast, waves cause the blades to move back and forth, increasing the exchange between the water column and that within the meadow. Therefore, the hydrodynamic conditions prevailing in the seagrass habitat (waves, tides) change the pattern of flow attenuation and mixing within the vegetation.

Ecosystem-based management is logistically and politically challenging because ecosystems are inherently complex and management decisions affect a multitude of groups. Coastal ecosystems, which lie at the interface between marine and terrestrial ecosystems and provide an array of ecosystem services to different groups, aptly illustrate these challenges. Successful ecosystem-based management of coastal ecosystems requires incorporating scientific information and the knowledge and views of interested parties into the decision-making process. Estimating the provision of ecosystem services under alternative management schemes offers a systematic way to incorporate biogeophysical and socioeconomic information and the views of individuals and groups in the policy and management process. Employing ecosystem services as a common language to improve the process of ecosystem-based management presents both benefits and difficulties. Benefits include a transparent method for assessing trade-offs associated with management alternatives, a common set of facts and common currency on which to base negotiations, and improved communication among groups with competing interests or differing worldviews. Yet challenges to this approach remain, including predicting how human interventions will affect ecosystems, how such changes will affect the provision of ecosystem services, and how changes in service provision will affect the welfare of different groups in society. In a case study from Puget Sound, Washington, we illustrate the potential of applying ecosystem services as a common language for ecosystem-based management. Fil: Granek, Elise F.. Environmental Science & Management, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Polasky, Stephen. Department of Applied Economics, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Kappel, Carrie V.. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Reed, Denise J.. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Stoms, David M.. Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Koch, Evamaría W.. Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Kennedy, Chris J.. Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Cramer, Lori A.. Department of Sociology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Hacker, Sally D.. Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Barbier, Edward B.. Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Aswani, Shankar. Department of Anthropology and IGP Marine Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Ruckelshaus, Mary. NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA 98112, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Perillo, Gerardo Miguel E.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía; Argentina Fil: Silliman, Brian R.. Zoology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Muthiga, Nyawira. Wildlife Conservation Society, Mombassa, 80107; Kenia Fil: Bael, David. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, U.S.A.; Estados Unidos Fil: Wolanski, Eric. ACTFR, James Cook University & Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland 4810; Australia