Search

Hydrogen and carbon capture and storage are pivotal to decarbonize the European energy system in a broad range of pathway scenarios. Yet, their timely uptake in different sectors and distribution across countries are affected by supply options of renewable and fossil energy sources. Here, we analyze the decarbonization of the European energy system towards 2060, covering the power, heat, and industry sectors, and the change in use of hydrogen and carbon capture and storage in these sectors upon Europe's decoupling from Russian gas. The results indicate that the use of gas is significantly reduced in the power sector, instead being replaced by coal with carbon capture and storage, and with a further expansion of renewable generators. Coal coupled with carbon capture and storage is also used in the steel sector as an intermediary step when Russian gas is neglected, before being fully decarbonized with hydrogen. Hydrogen production mostly relies on natural gas with carbon capture and storage until natural gas is scarce and costly at which time green hydrogen production increases sharply. The disruption of Russian gas imports has significant consequences on the decarbonization pathways for Europe, with local energy sources and carbon capture and storage becoming even more important., Comment: 39 pages, 7 figures, submitted to the Journal of Cleaner Production

Hydrogen will be a central cross-sectoral energy carrier in the decarbonization of the European energy system. This paper investigates how a large-scale deployment of green hydrogen production affects the investments in transmission and generation towards 2060, analyzes the North Sea area with the main offshore wind projects, and assesses the development of an offshore energy hub. Results indicate that the hydrogen deployment has a tremendous impact on the grid development in Europe and in the North Sea. Findings indicate that total power generation capacity increases around 50%. The offshore energy hub acts mainly as a power transmission asset, leads to a reduction in total generation capacity, and is central to unlock the offshore wind potential in the North Sea. The effect of hydrogen deployment on power prices is multifaceted. In regions where power prices have typically been lower than elsewhere in Europe, it is observed that hydrogen increases the power price considerably. However, as hydrogen flexibility relieves stress in high-demand periods for the grid, power prices decrease in average for some countries. This suggests that while the deployment of green hydrogen will lead to a significant increase in power demand, power prices will not necessarily experience a large increase., Comment: Submitted to Energy

In transmission expansion planning, situations can arise in which an expansion plan that is optimal for the system as a whole is detrimental to a specific country in terms of its expected economic welfare. If this country is one of the countries hosting the planned capacity expansion, it has the power to veto the plan and thus, undermine the system-wide social optimum. To solve this issue, welfare compensation mechanisms may be constructed that compensate suffering countries and make them willing to participate in the expansion plan. In the literature, welfare compensation mechanisms have been developed that work in expectation. However, in a stochastic setting, even if the welfare effect after compensation is positive in expectation, countries might still be hesitant to accept the risk that the actual, realized welfare effect may be negative in some scenarios. In this paper we analyze welfare compensation mechanisms in a stochastic setting. We consider two existing mechanisms, lump-sum payments and purchase power agreements, and we develop two novel mechanisms, based on the flow through the new transmission line and its economic value. Using a case study of the Northern European power market, we investigate how well these mechanisms succeed in mitigating risk for the countries involved. Using a theoretically ideal model-based mechanism, we show that there is a significant potential for mitigating risk through welfare compensation mechanisms. Out of the four practical mechanisms we consider, our results indicate that a mechanism based on the economic value of the new transmission line is most promising., Comment: 18 pages, 10 figures

The authors provide a comprehensive overview of flexibility characterization along the dimensions of time, spatiality, resource, and risk in power systems. These dimensions are discussed in relation to flexibility assets, products, and services, as well as new and existing flexibility market designs. The authors argue that flexibility should be evaluated based on the dimensions under discussion. Flexibility products and services can increase the efficiency of power systems and markets if flexibility assets and related services are taken into consideration and used along the time, geography, technology, and risk dimensions. Although it is possible to evaluate flexibility in existing market designs, a local flexibility market may be needed to exploit the value of the flexibility, depending on the dimensions of the flexibility products and services. To locate flexibility in power grids and prevent incorrect valuations, the authors also discuss TSO-DSO coordination along the four dimensions, and they present interrelations between flexibility dimensions, products, services, and related market designs for productive usage of flexible electricity., Comment: This paper was sent to the Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews at August 2021. It is currently under review