Search

After more than a decade of studying the ecotoxicity of graphene oxide nanomaterials (nGOs), it has been concluded that there is limited information available regarding the environmental risk of graphene-based materials. Since existing ecotoxicological studies of nanomaterials have produced contradictory results, it is recommended that case-by-case studies should be conducted to evaluate their effects. This can be carried out by employing several methods, testing species from different trophic levels, and conducting community studies. Our goal was to evaluate the toxicity effects of two GOs (AF 96/97 and PM 995) derived from different graphite precursors on various test organisms from diverse trophic levels (bacteria, protozoa, a freshwater microbial community, plants, and invertebrate animals) in aquatic environments. We compared the effects of both nGO types and estimated the predicted no-effect environmental concentration (PNEC) values to determine their potential environmental risk. Our findings demonstrated the need for a complex ecotoxicity toolkit since the ecotoxicity results varied based on the test organism, the selected endpoints, and the test method used. Additionally, we found that toxicity effects were dependent on the concentration and characteristics of the specific nGO type used, as well as the exposure time. We estimated the PNEC values for GO AF 96/97 and GO PM 995 in the aquatic compartment to be 8 ng/L and 4 ng/L, respectively. Even after applying the worst-case scenario approach, the tested nGOs pose no environmental risk.

Even though graphene-family materials (GFMs) hold great promise for various applications, there are still significant knowledge gaps in ecotoxicology and environmental risk assessment associated with their potential environmental impacts. Here, we provide a critical perspective on published ecotoxicity studies of GFMs based on meticulous bibliometric research. Based on the results of our review paper, in order to fill in the current critical knowledge gaps, the following issues are recommended for consideration: performing more studies on GFMs’ effects at environmentally relevant concentrations and more field and laboratory studies with marine and terrestrial organisms. It is also recommended to assess the ecotoxicity of GFMs in more environmentally relevant conditions, such as in trophic chain transfer studies and by multispecies exposure in micro- or mesocosms, as well as gaining insights into the interactive effects between GFMs and environmental pollutants. It was also revealed that despite their widespread detection in different environmental compartments the potential impacts of GFMs in complex test systems where hierarchical trophic organisation or trophic transfer studies are significantly under-represented. One of the main causes was identified as the difficulties in the physicochemical characterisation of GFMs in complex terrestrial test systems or aquatic micro- and mesocosm studies containing a sediment phase. The lack of tools for adequate characterisation of GFMs in these complex test systems may discourage researchers from conducting experiments under environmentally relevant test conditions. In the coming years, fundamental research about these complex test systems will continue to better understand the mechanism behind GFM toxicity affecting organisms in different environmental compartments and to ensure their safe and sustainable use in the future.