Search

Background: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a frequent cerebrovascular disorder and still associated with high mortality and poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this review was to update a 15-year-old former meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) addressing the question of whether ICH patients treated with dexamethasone have better outcomes than controls. Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane as well as web platforms on current clinical trials were searched for the years 1970–2020 without constriction on language. Data were extracted and outcomes were pooled for conventional and cumulative meta-analysis using a commercial software program (www.Meta-Analysis.com). Results: Finally, 7 RCTs were identified and analyzed including 248 participants in the dexamethasone groups and 242 in the control groups. Five studies showed a high risk of bias. The overall relative risk (RR) for death was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–1.76; p = 0.06) and did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. After exclusion of studies with high risk of bias, the RR for death was 1.37 (95% CI 0.54–3.42; p = 0.51). The RR for poor outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups analyzed for all included studies (RR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.47–1; p = 0.05) and after exclusion of studies with high risk of bias (RR = 0.7; 95% CI 0.45–1.08; p = 0.11). The RR for complications did not differ significantly including all studies (RR = 1.29; 95% CI 0.77–2.17; p = 0.34) and after exclusion of studies with high risk of bias (RR = 1.27; 95% CI 0.18–8.89; p = 0.81). The cumulative statistics delivered no other results; however, it pointed out fewer complications over time in the dexamethasone group. Conclusion: Clear evidence of a beneficial or negative effect of dexamethasone is still lacking. Modern RCTs or observational studies with propensity design are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with dexamethasone in patients with ICH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: In patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion, the prognosis has improved tremendously since the implementation of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). The effect of EVT on the incidence of malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions (MMI) has not been studied before.Methods: ESTIMATE, a multicenter retrospective study, evaluates data of ischemic stroke patients with occlusion in the anterior circulation in the years of 2007-2015 comparing three treatment options (no therapy; IV-TPA; IV-TPA plus EVT or EVT only). Primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of MMI on follow-up imaging and mortality rates. Secondary endpoints were functional outcome, further clinical and imaging data. Logistic and Cox-regression models with a propensity score weighting approach were applied to evaluate differences between treatment groups.Results: In 2161 patients over 9 years, EVT reduced the MMI rates significantly: patients without acute stroke treatment had increased odds for MMI of 1.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-1.65]. In contrast, after treatment with IV-TPA, only we observed an OR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94, p < 0.001), and after EVT an OR of 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.85, p < 0.001). This was more pronounced in larger pretreatment infarctions (ASPECTS < 5, p < 0.01). IV-TPA also lowers the MMI rates but not to the same extent. EVT-treated patients had increased survival rates (p < 0.05) and the best functional outcome at discharge.Conclusions: The findings of this study illustrate that occurrence of MMI and mortality rates was significantly reduced in patients treated with EVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]