Search

In more traditional medical education, medical students took a patient's medical history by asking a series of sequenced, routine questions, covering presenting medical problem(s); medical history; social and personal history; systems review; and physical examination. Following this process, the student then attempted to derive the patient's medical problems. This inductive problem-solving paradigm may not assist students to prepare for their future interviewing needs, given doctors use a hypothetico-deductive, problem-solving approach when interviewing patients and numerous researchers have developed specialized communication skills training programmes designed to enhance students' interviewing skills. Students given specific consulting skills training have tended to show significantly greater interpersonal effectiveness and improved interview behaviours compared with students who experience traditional patient clerking training. These improvements in interviewing tend to persist over the period of students' medical training. The aim of the present study was to determine whether specialized communication skills training helped students elicit greater quantity and quality of information from patients and if so, whether such information assisted students in improving their diagnostic skills. Videotaped history-taking interviews conducted by students trained in communication skills and untrained (control) students were rated for their interview efficiency. A comparison of ratings given by experimentally naive, independent observers revealed that trained students were more efficient, but took no longer than their control group counterparts to elicit fuller, more relevant information. However, the student groups did not differ in the accuracy or scope of their medical diagnoses. It is argued that students' lack of medical knowledge in this early phase of their clinical training militated against their being able to use their interviewing competence to derive more potentially accurate medical diagnoses.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a communication programme taught to medical students at the University of Melbourne in their preclinical years. The effectiveness of the programme was assessed by comparing videotaped history-taking interviews completed by a cohort of first-year clinical students in 1986, who had not undertaken the communication programme, with a similar cohort of first-year clinical students in 1992 who had undertaken the programme. The students from the 1986 cohort who had not undertaken communication training in their preclinical course completed their videotaped interviews as part of the experimental evaluation of a consulting skills training programme carried out in 1986-87. A comparison of ratings given by two experimentally naive, independent observers revealed that the 1992 student cohort demonstrated some significantly better skills at questioning and facilitating communication with patients. By contrast, the 1986 student cohort showed significantly greater skills at maintaining relevance in their interviews and greater capacity to explore patients' psychosocial concerns. These data suggest that students acquire the most effective interview skills when interacting with patients during their clinical training.

This study evaluates the impact of a training programme in communications skills on subsequent diagnostic efficiency. Videotaped history-taking interviews conducted by groups of specially trained and control groups of students were rated for their diagnostic efficiency by two medical practitioners. Students in the trained group had shown greatly increased skills in interviewing and interpersonal effectiveness as a result of their training. A comparison of ratings given by the two experimentally naive, independent observers revealed that trained students were significantly better at eliciting full, relevant data from patients--they were diagnostically more efficient, but took no longer than their control group counterparts to elicit the information. Further research with the medical interview rating scale will clarify the skills required of medical students in interviewing and diagnosis and facilitate remedial training for students who show poor interview skills.

The consulting skills required of medical students and practitioners have been categorized into a number of specific skills, two of which are: students' ability to empathize with the patient; and ability to decode non-verbal cues given by the patient in the interview. Training programmes to improve students' consulting skills are usually evaluated using analysis of students' actual interview behaviours with patients. Broad psychological and personality tests have also been used to measure changes in students' interviewing skills, but have generally not been successful. The hypothesis is advanced that more specific tests of the skills of interviewing, such as non-verbal sensitivity and empathy, would detect changes in students' ability to display these skills. As part evaluation of a consulting skills training programme, clinical students completed psychological tests of empathy and non-verbal sensitivity. Subsequent comparisons between trained and control student groups revealed no clear pattern in test results. These data suggest that specific psychological tests of empathy and non-verbal sensitivity may be no more effective in detecting changes in students' interpersonal skills than global personality measures.

The consulting skills acquired by medical students during their training are an important determinant of their ability to conduct adequate and efficient clinical interviews. These skills comprise: the acquisition of medical knowledge and the ability to apply this; and communication skills required to obtain full, accurate clinical histories from patients and to be able to give to patients the information they need to comply with prescribed regimens. Until recently, consulting skills training has certainly not had a high profile in medical curricula, despite evidence that students do not gain sufficient expertise during their medical training. A history-taking skills course within the Austin Hospital Clinical School, utilizing mass lecture and small-group skills workshops is described. Independent evaluation of students' videotaped interviews with patients, completed before training, after mass lectures and following small-group workshops, showed that students trained in consulting skills demonstrated significant improvements in interview skills and techniques, compared with a similar group of students for whom training followed the more traditional model. Whilst there were some improvements after mass lectures, most significant gains in history-taking skills were obtained following skills workshops. Ongoing evaluation of these students will determine if these short-term improvements in consultation skills persist over their clinical training and internship.