Search

Objective: The University of Michigan Medical School is integrating into its curriculum the attitudes, knowledge, and skills that pertain to the care of older individuals using a defined set of core learning outcomes encompassing all four years. Students will demonstrate proficiency in these outcomes as a graduation requirement. We have developed an individualized, interactive, Web-based geriatrics portfolio to track the acquisition and mastery of these outcomes for students., Description: The required learning outcomes in geriatrics are presented to first-year students in their geriatrics portfolio Web page. The outcomes have been adapted from the recommendations published by the American Geriatrics Society's Education Committee.(1) The portfolio cross-references learning outcomes to specific activities in the curriculum. The activities include content given in lectures, multidisciplinary case discussions, standardized patient instructor (SPI) experiences involving older patients, and specific types of patient encounters during the clinical years. The portfolio allows documentation of completion dates of specific activities and the evaluations the student received. Certain activities such as the SPI experiences will include hyperlinks to their descriptions and the information that should be reviewed prior to each activity. The portfolio is integrated with existing administrative databases. Data entry occurs through links (e.g., exam scores), uploading comment forms from the SPI, and direct student input. One novel example of student input is the ability to upload information concerning encounters with older patients that students are recording in personal data assistant templates such that this information maps directly to the appropriate learning outcomes in their portfolios. The portfolio is designed to encourage students to take responsibility for their geriatrics education. Several types of evaluation data are provided, some that are specific to an activity (e.g., SPI feedback) and others that provide global assessments of learning outcomes (e.g., attitude surveys). The Web page can be displayed by the list of outcomes (categorized by attitudes, knowledge, and skills), by medical school year, and by date of completion. In this way, students can see at a glance how they are performing and whether they are up-to-date with completing the required outcomes., Discussion: The geriatrics portfolio serves to identify and highlight geriatrics-related content across the four years. Its interactive features make it much more dynamic than a written transcript. Requiring proficiency in learning outcomes related to geriatrics for graduation will clearly convey to students that this information is critically important in their training to become physicians. The individualized evaluation summaries will prove useful to the student because self-directed learning opportunities can be targeted to address weak areas. Evaluation of performances will also aid program directors to appropriately modify the curriculum to address any deficiencies. This innovative Web-based approach to capture learning outcomes that are dispersed throughout a four-year curriculum may also find application in similar curricula (e.g., women's health and end-of-life care).

Purpose: To demonstrate an effective model for designing, implementing, and evaluating the Sociocultural Medicine Program (SMP), part of a comprehensive sociocultural medicine curriculum at the University of Michigan Medical School., Method: This study followed a cross-sectional, pre- and post-intervention survey design. A total of 167 medical students completed a measure of attitudes toward sociocultural issues in medicine prior to and following participation in the SMP. Students' attitudes were assessed in the domains of "exposure to sociocultural issues," "sociocultural factors in clinical scenarios," and "sociocultural background in patient/physician/health status issues.", Results: Paired t-tests of the pre- and post-intervention responses revealed significant positive changes for items in the domain of exposure to sociocultural issues in medicine: experience with sociocultural issues in a clinical setting (p <.01), understanding of relationship among sociocultural background, health, and medicine (p <.001), and importance of sociocultural background in students' future patient populations (p <.01). Significant changes were also found for the impact of sociocultural background in patient/physician/health status issues: physician-patient relationship (p <.001) and patients' health behavior (p <.001)., Conclusions: The SMP had a significant educational impact on students' attitudes towards sociocultural issues in medicine. Students reported greater exposure to these issues conceptually and clinically, and greater influence of sociocultural factors in patients' behaviors and patient- physician relationships. Critical components of this SMP were faculty development, multiple teaching approaches, and pre- and post-intervention evaluation.

In 1997, five years after a major curricular reform at the University of Michigan Medical School, the authors revisited the Goals for Medical Education (written by faculty to guide the reform process) to identify factors that had facilitated or hindered their achievement. By reviewing responses to identical questionnaires circulated to faculty in 1993 and again in 1997, they learned that considerably more lectures were being used to deliver curricular content in the first-year curriculum than the faculty thought was ideal, and that less social science, humanities, and ethics material was being presented in the first year than the faculty thought was ideal. The authors also learned that consensus between faculty basic scientists and faculty clinicians about the content that would make up an ideal first-year curriculum had diverged since adoption of the new curriculum. Movement toward decreasing the amounts of social sciences, humanities, and ethics in the first year of medical school was particularly pronounced among the basic scientists, who felt this material was being taught prematurely and at the expense of essential basic science content. In contrast, by 1997 much closer agreement had developed between the two groups regarding time they would allocate for lectures; this agreement unfortunately reflected a stagnation in the adoption of active learning methods. Movement toward increasing the amount of time for lectures in the first-year curriculum was particularly pronounced among the clinicians, who reported feeling more and more pressured to bring in clinical revenues. Based on faculty comments and the school's experience with centralized governance and centralized funding, the authors propose a direct linkage between institutional funding to departments and the teaching effort of faculty in the departments, and sufficient, centralized funding to relieve pressure on faculty and to foster educational creativity. They maintain that this may be the most effective way to guarantee ongoing innovation, support interdisciplinary teaching, and subsequently move the curriculum and teachers completely away from content that is isolated within traditional department structures. At the same time they acknowledge that changing faculty attitudes presents a challenge.

This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument designed to assess medical students' comfort with a range of sociocultural issues and intercultural experiences. Each survey item obliged students to reflect on their own sociocultural identities and academic status in relation to others', and to judge how comfortable they would be interacting across perceived boundaries based on sociocultural identity and academic status. More than 90% of University of Michigan first-year medical students (n=153) completed the survey just before classes began. Principal components analysis of the survey's 26 items identified 7 interpretable factors or subscales; the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients for the 7 subscales and the total scale ranged from .73 to .92. T-tests were used to investigate differences in average ratings among student subgroups (based on gender and ethnicity). To assess the magnitude of the effect of the differences between groups, effect size was computed for each of the means comparisons. Psychometric analyses indicated that this survey was both reliable and valid for assessing students' cultural attitudes. Further, analyses by gender and ethnic subgroup identified meaningful ratings differences in men's and women's reported comfort levels. Our findings suggest that this instrument is useful for assessing students' openness to developing cultural awareness and competence. Educators at other medical schools may find this instrument useful as a needs assessment tool for planning educational programs designed to increase students' cultural competence.

Background: In 1992-93 the University of Michigan Medical School revised its first-year curriculum. An evaluation system using honors, high-pass, pass, and fail grading and only two examinations (a midterm and a final) was replaced with a system using pass/fail grading and weekly quizzes in addition to the two examinations. The objective was to increase students' satisfaction while maintaining a high level of achievement., Method: Students' performance scores and survey data from the final year of the former system (1991-92, 222 students) and the first year of the new system (1992-93, 195 students) were used to investigate whether overall performance decreased and whether the students liked the new approach to grading. Statistical methods used were one-sample t-tests, Student's t-test, and Fisher's Z-test., Results: Under the new system, the average scores for courses remained well above passing, and no evidence was found that the students achieved at lower levels than had their predecessors with the former, more traditional grading system. Also, higher cumulative pre-final scores (i.e., scores on the weekly quizzes as well as the midterm) did not predict lower, "just passing" achievement on final examinations. The students' responses to the surveys included comments that pass/fail grading eased anxiety and reduced competition while encouraging the students' co-operation., Conclusion: Despite concerns that implementing pass/fail grading for all first-year courses would result in lower overall performance and decreased motivation among students, during the first year of implementation these fears proved to be unfounded as the students continued to perform well and reported greater satisfaction with the new system.