1. Good scientific practice in EEG and MEG research: Progress and perspectives
- Author
-
Niso, Guiomar, Krol, Laurens, Combrisson, Etienne, Dubarry, Anne-Sophie, Elliott, Madison, François, Clément, Héjja-Brichard, Yseult, Herbst, Sophie, Jerbi, Karim, Kovic, Vanja, Lehongre, Katia, Luck, Steven, Mercier, Manuel, Mosher, John, Pavlov, Yuri, Puce, Aina, Schettino, Antonio, Schön, Daniele, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Somon, Bertille, Šoškić, Anđela, Styles, Suzy, Tibon, Roni, Vilas, Martina, van Vliet, Marijn, Chaumon, Maximilien, Indiana University [Bloomington], Indiana University System, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Brandenburg University of Technology [Cottbus – Senftenberg] (BTU), Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (INT), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire Parole et Langage (LPL), Institute of Language, Communication and the Brain (ILCB), University of British Columbia (UBC), Google Inc, Research at Google, Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Service NEUROSPIN (NEUROSPIN), Université Paris-Saclay-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal (UQAM), Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (Mila), University of Belgrade [Belgrade], Institut du Cerveau = Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), University of California [Davis] (UC Davis), University of California (UC), Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (INS), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), University of Tübingen, Ural Federal University [Ekaterinburg] (UrFU), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (IGDORE ), Duke University [Durham], Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO), Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences [Singapour] (SICS), Agency for science, technology and research [Singapore] (A*STAR), University of Nottingham, UK (UON), University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM), Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation (ESI), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Aalto University, Center for NeuroImaging Research-Human MRI Neuroimaging core facility for clinical research [ICM Paris] (CENIR), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], ANR-20-CE28-0017,BABYLANG,Perception de la parole et acquisition du vocabulaire chez les bébés(2020), Indiana University, Brandenburg University of Technology, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Universite d'Aix Marseille (Aix-Marseille Université) - University of Aix-Marseille, CEA Saclay, University of Montreal, University of Belgrade, Sorbonne Université, University of California, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, University of Tuebingen, Duke University, Université de Toulouse, Nanyang Technological University, University of Cambridge, Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, and Aalto-yliopisto
- Subjects
MEG ,Open Science ,[SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/Neuroscience ,Good scientific practice ,Good practise ,Magnetoencephalography (MEG) ,EEG ,Electroencephalography (EEG) - Abstract
Good scientific practice (GSP) refers to both explicit and implicit rules, recommendations, and guidelines that help scientists to produce work that is of the highest quality at any given time, and to efficiently share that work with the community for further scrutiny or utilization. For experimental research using magneto- and electroencephalography (MEEG), GSP includes specific standards and guidelines for technical competence, which are periodically updated and adapted to new findings. However, GSP also needs to be regularly revisited in a broader light. At the LiveMEEG 2020 conference, a reflection on GSP was fostered that included explicitly documented guidelines and technical advances, but also emphasized intangible GSP: a general awareness of personal, organizational, and societal realities and how they can influence MEEG research. This article provides an extensive report on most of the LiveMEEG contributions and new literature, with the additional aim to synthesize ongoing cultural changes in GSP. Itfirst covers GSP with respect to cognitive biases and logical fallacies, pre-registration as a tool to avoid those and other early pitfalls, and a number of resources to enable collaborative and reproducible research as a general approach to minimize misconceptions. Second, it covers GSP with respect to data acquisition, analysis, reporting, and sharing, including new tools and frameworks to support collaborative work. Finally, GSP is considered in light of ethical implications of MEEG research and the resulting responsibility that scientists have to engage with societal challenges. Considering among other things the benefits of peer review and open access at all stages, the need to coordinate larger international projects, the complexity of MEEG subject matter, and today's prioritization of fairness, privacy, and the environment, we find that current GSP tends to favor collective and cooperative work, for both scientific and for societal reasons.
- Published
- 2022