Search

Elastography has emerged as a preferred non-invasive imaging technique for the clinical assessment of liver fibrosis. Elastography methods provide liver stiffness measurement (LSM) as a surrogate quantitative biomarker for fibrosis burden in chronic liver disease (CLD). Elastography can be performed either with ultrasound or MRI. Currently available ultrasound-based methods include strain elastography, two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), point shear wave elastography (pSWE), and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). MR Elastography (MRE) is widely available as two-dimensional gradient echo MRE (2D-GRE-MRE) technique. US-based methods provide estimated Young's modulus (eYM) and MRE provides magnitude of the complex shear modulus. MRE and ultrasound methods have proven to be accurate methods for detection of advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Other clinical applications of elastography include liver decompensation prediction, and differentiation of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from simple steatosis (SS). In this review, we briefly describe the different elastography methods, discuss current clinical applications, and provide an overview of advances in the field of liver elastography.

OBJECTIVES—: To quantify the bias of shear wave speed (SWS) measurements between different commercial ultrasonic shear elasticity systems and a magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) system in elastic and viscoelastic phantoms. METHODS—: Two elastic phantoms, representing healthy through fibrotic liver, were measured with 5 different ultrasound platforms, and 3 viscoelastic phantoms, representing healthy through fibrotic liver tissue, were measured with 12 different ultrasound platforms. Measurements were performed with different systems at different sites, at 3 focal depths, and with different appraisers. The SWS bias across the systems was quantified as a function of the system, site, focal depth, and appraiser. A single MRE research system was also used to characterize these phantoms using discrete frequencies from 60 to 500 Hz. RESULTS—: The SWS from different systems had mean difference 95% confidence intervals of ±0.145 m/s (±9.6%) across both elastic phantoms and ± 0.340 m/s (±15.3%) across the viscoelastic phantoms. The focal depth and appraiser were less significant sources of SWS variability than the system and site. Magnetic resonance elastography best matched the ultrasonic SWS in the viscoelastic phantoms using a 140 Hz source but had a − 0.27 ± 0.027-m/s (−12.2% ± 1.2%) bias when using the clinically implemented 60-Hz vibration source. CONCLUSIONS—: Shear wave speed reconstruction across different manufacturer systems is more consistent in elastic than viscoelastic phantoms, with a mean difference bias of < ±10% in all cases. Magnetic resonance elastographic measurements in the elastic and viscoelastic phantoms best match the ultrasound systems with a 140-Hz excitation but have a significant negative bias operating at 60 Hz. This study establishes a foundation for meaningful comparison of SWS measurements made with different platforms.

Objectives Thyroid shear wave elastography (SWE) has been shown to have advantages compared to biopsy or other imaging modalities in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, studies show variability in its assessment. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether stiffness measurements of the normal thyroid, as estimated by SWE, varied due to preload force or the pressure applied between the transducer and the patient. Methods In this study, a measurement system was attached to the ultrasound transducer to measure the applied load. Shear wave elastographic measurements were obtained from the left lobe of the thyroid at applied transducer forces between 2 and 10 N. A linear mixed-effects model was constructed to quantify the association between the preload force and stiffness while accounting for correlations between repeated measurements within each participant. The preload force effect on elasticity was modeled by both linear and quadratic terms to account for a possible nonlinear association between these variables. Results Nineteen healthy volunteers without known thyroid disease participated in the study. The participants had a mean age ± SD of 36 ± 8 years; 74% were female; 74% had a normal body mass index; and 95% were white non-Hispanic/Latino. The estimated elastographic value at a 2-N preload force was 16.7 kPa (95% confidence interval, 14.1-19.3 kPa), whereas the value at 10 N was 29.9 kPa (95% confidence interval, 24.9-34.9 kPa). Conclusions The preload force was significantly and nonlinearly associated with SWE estimates of thyroid stiffness. Quantitative standardization of preload forces in the assessment of thyroid nodules using elastography is an integral factor for improving the accuracy of thyroid nodule evaluation.

The purpose of this study was to develop an automated method for classifying liver fibrosis stage ≥F2 based on ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) and to assess the system's performance in comparison with a reference manual approach. The reference approach consists of manually selecting a region of interest from each of eight or more SWE images, computing the mean tissue stiffness within each of the regions of interest and computing a resulting stiffness value as the median of the means. The 527-subject database consisted of 5526 SWE images and pathologist-scored biopsies, with data collected from a single system at a single site. The automated method integrates three modules that assess SWE image quality, select a region of interest from each SWE measurement and perform machine learning-based, multi-image SWE classification for fibrosis stage ≥F2. Several classification methods were developed and tested using fivefold cross-validation with training, validation and test sets partitioned by subject. Performance metrics were area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), specificity at 95% sensitivity and number of SWE images required. The final automated method yielded an AUROC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.90–0.94) versus 0.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.65–0.72) for the reference method, 71% specificity with 95% sensitivity versus 5% and four images per decision versus eight or more. In conclusion, the automated method reported in this study significantly improved the accuracy for ≥F2 classification of SWE measurements as well as reduced the number of measurements needed, which has the potential to reduce clinical workflow.

Tissue stiffness has long been known to be a biomarker of tissue pathology. Ultrasound elastography measures tissue mechanical properties by monitoring the response of tissue to acoustic energy. Different elastographic techniques have been applied to many different tissues and diseases. Depending on the pathology, patient-based factors, and ultrasound operator-based factors, these techniques vary in accuracy and reliability. In this review, we discuss the physical principles of ultrasound elastography, discuss differences between different ultrasound elastographic techniques, and review the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques in clinical practice.

In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for differentiating high-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (hrNASH) from non-alcoholic fatty liver and low-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease scheduled for liver biopsy underwent pre-biopsy SWE. Ten SWE measurements were obtained. Biopsy samples were reviewed using the NASH Clinical Research Network Scoring System and patients with hrNASH were identified. Receiver operating characteristic curves for SWE-based hrNASH diagnosis were charted. One hundred sixteen adult patients underwent liver biopsy at our institution for the evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SWE for hrNASH diagnosis was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.84, p < 0.001). The Youden index-based optimal stiffness cutoff value for hrNASH diagnosis was calculated as 8.4 kPa (1.67 m/s), with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 66%. SWE may be useful for the detection of NASH patients at risk of long-term liver-specific morbidity and mortality.

Liver fibrosis is a histological hallmark of most chronic liver diseases, which can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure, and predisposes to hepatocellular carcinoma. Accurate diagnosis of liver fibrosis is necessary for prognosis, risk stratification, and treatment decision-making. Liver biopsy, the reference standard for assessing liver fibrosis, is invasive, costly, and impractical for surveillance and treatment response monitoring. Elastography offers a noninvasive, objective, and quantitative alternative to liver biopsy. This article discusses the need for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and reviews the comparative advantages and limitations of ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography techniques with respect to their basic concepts, acquisition, processing, and diagnostic performance. Variations in clinical contexts of use and common pitfalls associated with each technique are considered. In addition, current challenges and future directions to improve the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of elastography techniques are discussed. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:25-42.